Re: pgsql: dummy commit

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 09:40:44AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 02:38:36PM +, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > dummy commit > > Sorry, I have no idea how that commit text got in there, but will figure > it out. I found the cause. It will not happen again. -- Bruce Momjia

Re: pgsql: dummy commit

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 02:38:36PM +, Bruce Momjian wrote: > dummy commit Sorry, I have no idea how that commit text got in there, but will figure it out. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a

pgsql: dummy commit

dummy commit Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6ecf488d91ceb93a8be907a24c5d8a90358534ed Modified Files -- doc/src/sgml/plperl.sgml | 4 ++-- doc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml | 4 ++-- doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml | 2 +- doc/src/sgml/pltcl.sgml|

Re: pgsql: dummy commit

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 05:34:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > dummy commit > > Uh, what? > > Also, I disagree with your change of the wording about savepoint > rollbacks. I agree that "if the savepoint is rolled back to" > is a bit awkward, but I think dropping the "to"

Re: pgsql: dummy commit

Bruce Momjian writes: > dummy commit Uh, what? Also, I disagree with your change of the wording about savepoint rollbacks. I agree that "if the savepoint is rolled back to" is a bit awkward, but I think dropping the "to" is flat wrong. The savepoint is a point you roll back to, it doesn't itsel

Re: pgsql: dummy commit

My apologies for this commit; it will be reverted now. --- On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:27:40PM +, Bruce Momjian wrote: > dummy commit > > Branch > -- > master > > Details > --- > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/

pgsql: dummy commit

dummy commit Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/834b80464d653c976787f5b5849fa0595678d0a0 Modified Files -- doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)