On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:12:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Oh, I am sorry. I was focused on the first part of the sentence and
> > didn't notice your change to the second part. How is this attachment?
>
> Seems same as your previous version?
OK, new vesion that uses
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Oh, I am sorry. I was focused on the first part of the sentence and
> didn't notice your change to the second part. How is this attachment?
Seems same as your previous version?
regards, tom lane
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 03:57:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Uh, I don't think we want to highlight the statement vs row difference
> > here but the fact that statement triggers fire on the referenced object
> > and not on the effected rows. I have attached an updated pat
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Uh, I don't think we want to highlight the statement vs row difference
> here but the fact that statement triggers fire on the referenced object
> and not on the effected rows. I have attached an updated patch which I
> think is an improvement
statement-level trigger
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 02:18:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> ... The attached patch updates the docs to say
> >> statement-level triggers fire on the "referenced" table, while row-level
> >> triggers fire only on
Thomas Munro writes:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> ... The attached patch updates the docs to say
>> statement-level triggers fire on the "referenced" table, while row-level
>> triggers fire only on the "affected" table, (vs. all affected tables)
>> even if they are
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:10:08PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:39:34PM +, i...@thepathcentral.com wrote:
>> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>> >
>> > Page: https://www.p