Re: Consistent reference to RFCs in the documentation

2020-12-01 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 1 Dec 2020, at 13:39, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 05/11/2020 17:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> The attached patch adds ulinks for all >> RFC's and marks subsequent mentions as acronym to make the docs consistent. >> It >> also spells all as "RFC " with a whitespace as that was the most

Re: Consistent reference to RFCs in the documentation

2020-12-01 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 05/11/2020 17:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: When referencing RFC's, we have a mix of ulinking to the ietf.org entry and not. Also, for subsequent mentions of the same RFC on the same page we have some as while others are not. I'm not sure how sensible the tag is for these. I mean, yeah,

Re: index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views

2020-12-01 Thread Fujii Masao
On 2020/12/01 14:14, shinya11.k...@nttdata.com wrote: Hi, The index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views point to the "Viewing Statistics" section, but not to the dedicated section (e.g., "ANALYZE Progress Reporting") for each view. IMO this is very inconvenient when finding the section descr