Michael Paquier writes:
> I don't have a strong opinion about the naming inconsistency between
> the opclass name and the opfamily name in this case, though, couldn't
> it create more problems than actually fix something?
Well, it's been like that from day one and people haven't complained.
I
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-logging.html
log_temp_files (integer)
Controls logging of temporary file names and sizes. Temporary files can be
created for sorts, hashes, and temporary query results. If enabled by this
setting, a log entry is emitted for each temporary
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:22:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wonder whether we shouldn't just revert this table to
> showing opclass names, and avert our eyes from the theoretical
> inconsistency. Michael, looks like it was your 7a1cd5260
> that changed it; what do you think?
Yes, the docs
> This naming was evidently chosen to match btree,
> which has both inet_ops and cidr_ops opclasses
> within its network_ops family.
> spgist only supports inet_ops
FWIW, the documentation for GIST has inet_ops in the equivalent table, so it
was extra-confusing because I thought SP-GIST's
PG Doc comments form writes:
> I wanted to add an SP-GIST index for an inet field ip_address
> In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html
> network_ops is stated as the built-in opclass for (inet, inet)
> I entered the following command:
> # create index concurrently
Michael, please see below:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:44 PM PG Doc comments form <
nore...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html
> Description:
>
> I wanted to add an
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:43 PM PG Doc comments form <
nore...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/functions-uuid.html
> Description:
>
> Regarding the documentation on this page:
>
PG Doc comments form writes:
> Regarding the documentation on this page:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/functions-uuid.html
> It think the documentation should state clearly, that postgres natively does
> not have any UUID generation functions.
That hasn't been true since we added
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:43 PM PG Doc comments form <
nore...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-alterdatabase.html
> Description:
>
> Would love to see more information about each of the
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html
Description:
I wanted to add an SP-GIST index for an inet field ip_address
In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html
network_ops
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-alterdatabase.html
Description:
Would love to see more information about each of the ALTER DATABASE
parameters... a specific... "connlimit"... -1 means no connections, but what
does 0
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/functions-uuid.html
Description:
Regarding the documentation on this page:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/functions-uuid.html
It think the documentation should state clearly, that
12 matches
Mail list logo
