On 20.05.2021 21:25, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
I'm totally confused. I'm taking timeout to think about it.
I got it! It wasn't my day.))
This wording worked for me:
The pg_monitor role is a member of the pg_read_all_settings role, which allows
its privileges to be used. Therefore, pg_monitor can
On 20.05.2021 21:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Luzanov writes:
So, is it correct to change description of pg_monitor role from:
"Read/execute various monitoring views and functions. This role is a member
of|pg_read_all_settings|,|pg_read_all_stats| and|pg_stat_scan_tables|."
to
"Read/execute va
Pavel Luzanov writes:
> So, is it correct to change description of pg_monitor role from:
> "Read/execute various monitoring views and functions. This role is a member
> of|pg_read_all_settings|,|pg_read_all_stats| and|pg_stat_scan_tables|."
> to
> "Read/execute various monitoring views and funct
Hello,
On 20.05.2021 20:27, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
So, is it correct to change description of pg_monitor role from:
"Read/execute various monitoring views and functions. This role is a member
of|pg_read_all_settings|,|pg_read_all_stats| and|pg_stat_scan_tables|."
to
"Read/execute various monitor
Hello,
On 20.05.2021 19:03, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Luzanov writes:
Let me try one more time.
What is correct from the English language point of view:
1. Julien Rouhaud is a member of PostgreSQL Community.
or
2. PostgreSQL Community is a member of Julien Rouhaud, Michael Paquier.
Or both forms
On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 12:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> List of roles
> Role name | Attributes | Member of
> ---+--+-
> bob | | {sysadmins}
> joe | | {sysadmins}
> sysadmins | Cannot login | {}
>
> and I think
Pavel Luzanov writes:
> Let me try one more time.
> What is correct from the English language point of view:
> 1. Julien Rouhaud is a member of PostgreSQL Community.
> or
> 2. PostgreSQL Community is a member of Julien Rouhaud, Michael Paquier.
> Or both forms are correct?
> I think that 1 is corr
On 20.05.2021 11:54, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:01 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 06:11:40AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
"This role is a member of pg_read_all_settings, pg_read_all_stats and
pg_stat_scan_tables."
Is it correct sentence?
It seems
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:01 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 06:11:40AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > "This role is a member of pg_read_all_settings, pg_read_all_stats and
> > pg_stat_scan_tables."
> > Is it correct sentence?
> > It seems for me that pg_read_all_stat
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 06:11:40AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> "This role is a member of pg_read_all_settings, pg_read_all_stats and
> pg_stat_scan_tables."
> Is it correct sentence?
> It seems for me that pg_read_all_stats is a member of pg_monitor. But not
> vice versa.
Here is what I a
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/default-roles.html
Description:
"This role is a member of pg_read_all_settings, pg_read_all_stats and
pg_stat_scan_tables."
Is it correct sentence?
It seems for me that pg_read_all_stats i
11 matches
Mail list logo
