W dniu 13.01.2021 o 12:28, Laurenz Albe pisze:
On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 07:41 +0100, W.P. wrote:
I am upgrading Fedora 24 to (now) 26, PostgreSQL stopped starting (as
expected), the message from systemctl was to do "postgresql-setup
--upgrade".
Did installed the tool, loaunched.
But it fails
You want to do NLP in postgres? I would say that you would need a tool like
opennlp to get your tokens and phases, then run a fuzzy matching algorithm.
Unless postgres has nlp capabilities but I am not sure I would use them.
You actually want something fairly complex.
Thanks,
Ben
On Sun, Jan
We are looking for working examples of comparing a long text string and
fuzzy-matching multiple words (namely, phrases) contained in.
Any such work examples?
Regards,
David
El día domingo, enero 17, 2021 a las 12:23:23p. m. -0700, David G. Johnston
escribió:
> Its 2021;
Yes, and for what this argument is good for? Is 2021 better than 2020 or
even worth?
> if an image is useful for the topic at hand (say designing a
> system and having a diagram showing that
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:05 PM Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Mails to a mailing list should be text (or even ASCII) because not all
> subscribers can read HTML or images and they're not needed to describe a
> problem.
>
Its 2021; if an image is useful for the topic at hand (say designing a
system
El día domingo, enero 17, 2021 a las 11:11:01a. m. -0800, Adrian Klaver
escribió:
> You can prevent that by going here:
>
> https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/
>
> and checking:
>
> Don't receive an extra copy of mails when listed in To or CC fields
Thanks. I wasn't aware of it and switched
On 1/17/21 11:04 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I disagree in some of the points:
El día domingo, enero 17, 2021 a las 10:10:28a. m. -0700, David G. Johnston
escribió:
Neither images nor non-plain-text means that the content is unreadable, not
useful, or problematic. Dealing with these
Hello,
I disagree in some of the points:
El día domingo, enero 17, 2021 a las 10:10:28a. m. -0700, David G. Johnston
escribió:
> Neither images nor non-plain-text means that the content is unreadable, not
> useful, or problematic. Dealing with these on an email-by-email basis
> through the
>
Yes it’s unfortunately highly probable that someone asking (yet again) how to
tune postgres will not first search for how to formulate a question. Not to
say such info as you, David, and others propose should not be made available as
it certainly should but that we may have to accept such
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 3:30 AM Paul Förster
wrote:
> > On 17. Jan, 2021, at 11:23, Thiemo Kellner
> wrote:
> >
> > I would not do that. It is the work on the wrong end with doubtful
> result. Wouldn't it be better to reject non-plain-text postings?
>
> coming to think of it:
> +1
>
>
Neither
Hi Thiemo,
> On 17. Jan, 2021, at 11:23, Thiemo Kellner
> wrote:
>
> I would not do that. It is the work on the wrong end with doubtful result.
> Wouldn't it be better to reject non-plain-text postings?
coming to think of it:
+1
> While at it, is there a rule of thumb for the length of
Also, could it be possible to make messages plain text? I see a lot
of varying fancy fonts and I hate that. I even hate it more when
people post messages not properly trimmed or messages that need
formatting preserved such as select output, i.e. table data, explain
plans, etc.
Hi Tim,
> On 17. Jan, 2021, at 10:04, Tim Cross wrote:
>
> There is nothing stopping you from using a text mail program, like mutt,
> on macOS.
right. And what I said was not meant to be a complaint. Otherwise I would have
complained long ago. It was just a wish. :-)
Cheers,
Paul
Hi Tim,
> On 17. Jan, 2021, at 09:43, Tim Cross wrote:
>
> Highly recommend a mutt and imap combination. Your not locked into any
> particular mail folder format, can still access things via mobile
> devices and can process messages fast and efficiently.
also, there's the good old elm. ;-)
>
Paul Förster writes:
> Hi raf,
>
>> On 17. Jan, 2021, at 02:59, raf wrote:
>>
>> I once wrote a program to do that very thing:
>>
>> http://raf.org/textmail/
>> https://github.com/raforg/textmail/
>
> thanks very much for the nice offer but I mostly read my Mails on a Mac,
> sometimes
Paul Förster writes:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> I'm on a Mac w/ Big Sur (macOS 11.1) and use Apple Mail. I've been on Macs
> since 2003. Apple Mail is simple to use and I love it for exactly that. But
> Apple Mail has everything I expect a mail client to have, it does not allow a
> couple of things
Hi raf,
> On 17. Jan, 2021, at 02:59, raf wrote:
>
> I once wrote a program to do that very thing:
>
> http://raf.org/textmail/
> https://github.com/raforg/textmail/
thanks very much for the nice offer but I mostly read my Mails on a Mac,
sometimes Windows, but never Linux. I have no mail
Hi Adrian,
> On 16. Jan, 2021, at 23:46, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
> That is trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube.
yes, but sometimes, just sometimes, things in the olden days were just better.
:-)
> Too many GUI email interfaces these days that use 'advanced` formatting. I
> use
18 matches
Mail list logo
