Re: Geographical multi-master replication

2019-01-28 Thread Ruben Rubio Rey
e, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:48 AM Jeremy Finzel wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ruben Rubio Rey wrote: > >> Hi Jeremy, >> >> > Why don't you consider upgrading from postgres 9.4 and with it to a >> supported version of BDR? There is nothing better

Re: Geographical multi-master replication

2019-01-28 Thread Ruben Rubio Rey
Hi Jeremy, > Why don't you consider upgrading from postgres 9.4 and with it to a supported version of BDR? There is nothing better you can do to keep your infrastructure up to date, performant, secure, and actually meet your multi-master needs than to upgrade to a newer version of postgres which

Geographical multi-master replication

2019-01-24 Thread Ruben Rubio Rey
Hi Everybody, I am currently working with a client that has requirements for geographically dispersed multi-master replication. The current solution that we have in place is the BDR 1.0.7, which is asynchronous and eventually consistent and it is actually very close to real time. So far we are ma