, having something like PL/java when it is not “supported” by anyone with a
markeatable name is always a barrier.
Furthermore, if it is not in the Postgres.org<http://Postgres.org> supported
things, it will not be available in AWS RDS service, AWS Aurora, Azure xyz,
Citus…, which limi
Rob Sargent schrieb am 07.12.2020 um 23:22:
> If I'm tracking correctly I can say the java implementation of
> CopyManager is, to me, blindingly fast. So if the E and the T are in
> java then certainly the L can be also.
I can confirm that using CopyManager in JDBC has pretty much the same
m: Rob Sargent
> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 11:16 AM
> To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: PL/java
>
> On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
> >> I want to say this. I never liked any extension l
:* Monday, December 7, 2020 11:16 AM
*To:* pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
*Subject:* Re: PL/java
On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
>> I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like
>> Java is not me
From: Rob Sargent
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 11:16 AM
To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PL/java
On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
>> I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like
>> Ja
>
>
>
> The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
>
>
With a few exceptions (Perl, Python) this is how the community handles all
"add-ons". A great number of features available to you are available as
third party extensions and not part of core.
On 12/7/20 8:16 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like
Java is not meant to interact with databases.
The JDBC folks might disagree.
That interaction is
On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like
Java is not meant to interact with databases.
The JDBC folks might disagree.
That interaction is strictly sql to db, data to app. As it
and PL-SQL, and we are now
porting
> everything to Postgres.
>
> All of our code outside of the database is java and I wiash that
all of
> our code within the database to be also in java.
>
> The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly b
abase is java and I wiash that all of
> > our code within the database to be also in java.
> >
> > The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
> >
> > I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official
> > procedural language. If so, wh
that all of
our code within the database to be also in java.
The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official
procedural language. If so, when?
None that I have heard of. Even if the decision where to made today
to be also in java.
The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official procedural
language. If so, when?
Thanks,
—
Zé Rui Marques
12 matches
Mail list logo
