RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

2000-01-28 Thread Nicolas Huillard
Thank to everybody, I recompiled Postgres and tested it on the same DB : the offending SELECT worked, without any index regeneration. Maybe the order in which the items where inserted in the table (using COPY, before creating the index) made it working. I only had problems with the source RPMs :

Re: [GENERAL] How to handle non-postgres questions?

2000-01-28 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 01:41:52PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Occasionally a question is posted to this list that is not a question > about postgres, but to which I know the answer. When this happens, I > usually reply only to the person who posted the question, rather than to > the whole

[GENERAL] How to handle non-postgres questions?

2000-01-28 Thread davidb
Occasionally a question is posted to this list that is not a question about postgres, but to which I know the answer.  When this happens, I usually reply only to the person who posted the question, rather than to the whole list.  I do this to minimize non-postgres traffic on the list.  Howe

Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

2000-01-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hiroshi neglected to mention that you'd probably need to drop and > >> recreate the index after applying the patch; if it's indeed out of > >> order, just patching the comparator bug isn't enough to fix it. > > > Does Hiroshi's patch get applied? >

Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

2000-01-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Applied. [Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nicolas Huillard > > > > I have a DB with is updated using MS Access. Primary keys are > > Int4 with default random values ("Num_

Re: [GENERAL] error message

2000-01-28 Thread Ed Loehr
"Jackson, Kevin J." wrote: > > 1) What does the following mean: > PostgresSQL query failed: ERROR: Bad date external representation You might have an illegal date string format, though this kind of message also shows up in other circumstances IIRC. Try 'MM/DD/' or '-MM-DD'... > 2) Is

[GENERAL] [Fwd: how to install postgresql-6.5.1 binaries on nt]

2000-01-28 Thread LIVIU ILIE
I have downloaded the postgres binaries for windows nt. Could somebody tell me how to start initdb. Also i had install cygnus20b but i can't do nothing with this. On Linux everything it's ok, but on nt i'm stacked.

[GENERAL] Use of datepart() on TimeStamp.

2000-01-28 Thread Jeffrey Silberberg
Using Access 97 I have a Database field defined as a time stamp being pulled in as a data type of date/time which is correct. My problem is that I now what to add some criteria to select it and have tried both the criteria of Date()-1 which results in an empty set, and createing a new field