On Tuesday 08 Jul 2003 5:55 pm, Bradley J. Bartram wrote:
The first query is simple:
SELECT a FROM table_a WHERE column_a = b
This will return a single row. The next query takes that derived value and
does a simliar select that returns multiple rows.
SELECT c FROM table_b WHERE column_b =
Hi, there is a small problem here I have, I would appreciate any
suggestion.
We were using Postgres 7.2.x and later 7.3.x under Red Hat 8, and
everything worked fine. Clients are working under windows and are
communicating to Postgres via ODBC. This weekend we tried to upgrade to
Red Hat
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Dragan Matic wrote:
Hi, there is a small problem here I have, I would appreciate any
suggestion.
We were using Postgres 7.2.x and later 7.3.x under Red Hat 8, and
everything worked fine. Clients are working under windows and are
communicating to Postgres via
On Tuesday 08 Jul 2003 6:38 pm, Dragan Matic wrote:
Hi, there is a small problem here I have, I would appreciate any
suggestion.
We were using Postgres 7.2.x and later 7.3.x under Red Hat 8, and
everything worked fine. Clients are working under windows and are
communicating to Postgres
On Tuesday 08 Jul 2003 6:38 pm, Dragan Matic wrote:
We were using Postgres 7.2.x and later 7.3.x under Red Hat 8, and
everything worked fine. Clients are working under windows and are
communicating to Postgres via ODBC.
Oh - one thing you need to know - there was an extra column
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:40:15 -0600 (MDT) scott.marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may have a firewall setup to block all ports by default.
firewall-config or something like it was the name of the firewall config
util in 7.2.
in recent redhats, this is likely it.
sudo /sbin/ipchains -L
Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can I ask why, since the plan is constructed at query-time the parameters
aren't substitued *before* planning?
Because then the plan couldn't be re-used. A SQL function may be
executed many times in a query, so the plan has to be reusable.
(Or, if you
On 2003.07.07 11:56 Mat wrote:
I believe that its more efficient to group INSERT's together and COMMIT
them in groups.
However, I am automatically entering a lot of data and some of its is
not unique. How can I reap the benefits of using BEGIN and COMMIT
without the whole block of
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:39:13PM -0500, Daniel Armbrust wrote:
Do you realize your entire website is hosed? NONE of the download sites
will resolve, and NONE of the mirror sites work (or will resolve).
What is up?
Maybe you have a bad
Hi, I have very interesting suspicion:
See my comments !
convert_string_datum
...
!this is my case
if (!lc_collate_is_c())
{
/* Guess that transformed string is not much bigger than
original */
xfrmsize = strlen(val) + 32;/* arbitrary
Maksim Likharev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! I would say very interesting aproach,
! why not just
xfrmsize = strxfrm(xfrmstr, NULL, 0);
strxfrm doesn't work that way (and if it did, it would give back a
malloc'd not a palloc'd string).
!if error happend, xfrmlen will be (size_t)-1
No it won't; see the man page for strxfrm.
RETURN VALUES
Upon successful completion, strxfrm() returns the length of
the transformed string (not including the terminating null
byte). If the value returned is n or more,
My initial impression is that AFTER triggers written in C cannot abort the wrapping
transaction if an error occurs. Is this correct?
---
Clay
Cisco Systems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(972) 813-5004
I've stopped 15,797 spam messages. You can too!
One month FREE spam protection at
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Clay Luther wrote:
My initial impression is that AFTER triggers written in C cannot abort
the wrapping transaction if an error occurs. Is this correct?
After triggers can still raise an exception condition to abort the
transaction with elog. They can't quietly change or
Hi,
I just found very interesting situation,
statistic ( n_distinct in particular) records for one of my columns,
greatly under calculated it saying:
49726, but in reality 33409816.
So planer never choose index but rather using table scan, and query
never returns,
is it any way how I can improve
The link at the end of 1.6 in the faq does not work.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the
The s_lock.h change will be in 7.4.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Martin D. Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't change the source tree at all. I used:
env CFLAGS='-O3 -m64' LD='/usr/bin/ld -melf_x86_64' ./configure
Interesting. The compiler doesn't do x86_64 by default --- you have to
enable it in the compile.
Any idea how to handle this in our builds? It doesn't seem like a
property of the OS as much as a property of the compiler --- we
already do 64-bit on some platforms without flags.
What is the
Maksim Likharev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On failure, strxfrm() returns (size_t)-1.
Not according to the Single Unix Specification, Linux, or HP-UX;
I don't have any others to check. But anyway, that is not causing
your problem, since palloc(0) would complain not dump core.
I am on SunOS
I would referrer dump that gar.xxg, and put PG on Linux,
but this is not up to me.
Thanks for the help.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:58 PM
To: Maksim Likharev
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG
I have a query where I want to select the usertable records that have a matching entry in
an event table. There are two ways to do this.
1) SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT u.uid) FROM usertable u, eventlog e WHERE u.uid = e.uid AND
e.type = XX;
2) SELECT COUNT(u.uid) FROM usertable u WHERE EXISTS(SELECT
--- Timothy Brier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've run in to this problem with a database we are
working. When I
restore a database schema, I need to restore the
schema 5 times to
ensure that the schema is complete. Also some of
the sequences are not
restored in a usable form.
Andrew Gould wrote:
--- Timothy Brier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've run in to this problem with a database we are
working. When I
restore a database schema, I need to restore the
schema 5 times to
ensure that the schema is complete. Also some of
the sequences are not
restored in a
Hi,
are there
any
Windows based
native data providers
for
PostGreSql
that
can be used from .Net applications
other
than Mono
regards-adivi
POSTGRESQL ADVOCACY FUND
Robert Treat has been selected by the Core Team as Treasurer for our new
PostgreSQL Advocacy Fund. Robert will soon be setting up an account in
the U.S. for receiving donations for the promotion of PostgreSQL. This
fund will be used primarily to print promotional
25 matches
Mail list logo
