Hi,
I'm kind of new to postgresql and the project that I'm working on currently
deals with parsing emails, storing parsed components in postgresql DB and
fire triggers
on certain inserts that opens socket connection with a unix tools server,
initiates tools like whois, traceroute etc and unix
Hi,
What would be the benefit of creating tables with OIDs as against one's not
with OIDs
Giving a unique identifier to each row inserted has some extra efficiency
factor involved or what.
Thanks,
Jas
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:12:41AM -0600, Kevin Kempter wrote:
Hi List;
Anyone have any thoughts per which logging method (SYSLOG vs STDERR)
is the better approach ?
Thanks in advance...
I prefer syslog because those logs are better suited for processing by
pgfouine and tools like it :)
Thanks,
my real function is quite expensive, so I don't want it to execute
twice. Toms subselect query is therefore exactly what I want, and since
it will be hidden in a view, it doesn't matter that it is a long expression.
Best regards,
Heiko
Tom Lane wrote:
regression=# select
Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
In this regard, I have to start working on some thesis topic related to the
postgres database that we are using in the project. It can be in
conjunction
with email parsing on unix tools but the theme of the thesis topic should
revolve around postgres database.
You
Jasbinder Singh Bali wrote:
Hi,
What would be the benefit of creating tables with OIDs as against one's not
with OIDs
Giving a unique identifier to each row inserted has some extra efficiency
factor involved or what.
OIDs are used by the various system tables.
Historically, all user tables
On 5/2/07, David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer syslog because those logs are better suited for processing by
pgfouine and tools like it :)
I prefer syslog-ng because I can send the logs of to a
central log-host using tcp ... :)
Cheers,
Andrej
---(end of
I'm testing with another snowball stemmer (dutch) and I have the same
problem. Backen crash with more than 200 characters in
select to_tsvector(
again default stemmer (english) work well
Are tsearch2 from postgresql 8.2.4 compatible with last stemmer from
http://www.snowball.tartarus.org
I am trying out postgresql-8.3-dev1 on Windows XP SP2 and during the
installation, I get the following error during the database cluster
initialization :
Here the log from initdb.log file :
The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user SYSTEM.
This user must also
On 5/2/07, Jamie Deppeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to check pgcluster out
http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/ witch does both.
That page will give you the impression that this project is dead and
abandoned -- the last update is from early 2005. PGCluster does seem
to be
On 5/2/07, Harpreet Dhaliwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm kind of new to postgresql and the project that I'm working on currently
deals with parsing emails, storing parsed components in postgresql DB and
fire triggers
on certain inserts that opens socket connection with a unix tools server,
Alexander Staubo wrote:
On 5/2/07, Jamie Deppeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to check pgcluster out
http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/ witch does both.
That page will give you the impression that this project is dead and
abandoned -- the last update is from early 2005.
On 5/2/07, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Staubo wrote:
On 5/2/07, Jamie Deppeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to check pgcluster out
http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/ witch does both.
That page will give you the impression that this project is dead and
Alexander Staubo wrote:
On 5/2/07, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Staubo wrote:
On 5/2/07, Jamie Deppeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to check pgcluster out
http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/ witch does both.
That page will give you the impression
On 5/2/07, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're different pages. The first one is horribly out of date;
unfortunately, it is (for me) the first hit on Google, whereas the
PgFoundry project page is the third.
Sure, they are different pages, but the first one is supposed to be
Alexander Staubo wrote:
On 5/2/07, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're different pages. The first one is horribly out of date;
unfortunately, it is (for me) the first hit on Google, whereas the
PgFoundry project page is the third.
Sure, they are different pages, but the first
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 08:00, Alexander Staubo wrote:
On 5/2/07, Harpreet Dhaliwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm kind of new to postgresql and the project that I'm working on currently
deals with parsing emails, storing parsed components in postgresql DB and
fire triggers
on certain inserts
Good Morning Scott-
The following URL contains the directive to Move Partition in a Partitioned
Tables
http://www.csee.umbc.edu/help/oracle8/server.815/a67772/partiti.htm
you will then need to rebuild the indices to point to the new partition
Is there some manner of automatically rebuilding
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 10:52, Martin Gainty wrote:
Good Morning Scott-
The following URL contains the directive to Move Partition in a Partitioned
Tables
http://www.csee.umbc.edu/help/oracle8/server.815/a67772/partiti.htm
you will then need to rebuild the indices to point to the new
On 5/2/07, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're running Oracle 9 here, and it's even worse than vacuuming. Once a
table grows, it stays grown until you rebuild it (you use the move
command, you just don't move it), and if it's filled up it's tablespace,
It's been a while since I
On May 1, 10:48 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
Ketema [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to access a subarray of a multi dimensional array as a
whole?
I think you want an array slice (ie, something with some colons in the
subscripts). See the
On May 1, 2007, at 10:11 , Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not having ARD3 myself, anyone happen to know which version of
PostgreSQL Apple's shipping with version 3? My ARD2 installation is
running 7.3.3.
The Mini I bought last summer seems to have 7.3.10
Postgres version 8.0.9 on Solaris 2.8. I know it's old but...
I have a table with a million rows.
I need to select data from this table based on an indexed column; I need
to select 600 possible values from the column, returning around 24,000
rows of data.
In perl I have a hash which has 600
Have you done a vacuum on the table recently?
I would be curious to see how:
select stuff from table
where index_key = key1 AND non_index_row in ('xyz','abc','def')
UNION ALL
select stuff from table
where index_key = key2 AND non_index_row in ('xyz','abc','def')
...
UNION ALL
select stuff from
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:45:08PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
Have you done a vacuum on the table recently?
We vacuum daily and cluster weekly after the nightly activities have been
performed.
IN list, then the IN list might benefit from a bit of analysis for
The IN list is just a set of
I've got a table with about 15 columns and 200,000 rows. I have indexes on a
lot of my columns, but postgres doesn't seem to be grabbing the ideal index --
in this case, an expression index that exactly matches my WHERE clause.
I have the following query:
SELECT columns FROM my_table WHERE
Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have the following query:
SELECT columns FROM my_table WHERE (bool_1 or int_1 = 0)
AND (int_2 IS NULL) AND (int_3 IS NULL) AND (protocol =
2) ORDER BY id LIMIT 1;
I made an expression index specifically for that where clause:
CREATE INDEX
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Postgres version 8.0.9 on Solaris 2.8. I know it's old but...
I have a table with a million rows.
I need to select data from this table based on an indexed column; I need
to select 600 possible values from the column, returning around 24,000
rows of
Richard Huxton wrote:
Jasbinder Singh Bali wrote:
Hi,
What would be the benefit of creating tables with OIDs as against
one's not
with OIDs
Giving a unique identifier to each row inserted has some extra
efficiency
factor involved or what.
OIDs are used by the various system tables.
On May 2, 2007, at 3:58 PM, Brent Wood wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
OIDs are used by the various system tables.
Historically, all user tables had them too.
There's no reason to use them in a new system - they offer no
advantages over an ordinary integer primary-key.
Generally this is
Hi all
I have postgresql server installed on a windows machine and I want to retrieve
data using C functions. I followed the steps in the documentation but it didn't
work for windows. I created a .dll projects for my functions but postgres.h
calls .h files that I can't find on the windows
Hi,
I'm trying to do an update on a table that has a unique constraint
on the field, I need to update the table by setting field = field+1
however if this does not perform the updates on the table in a proper
order (from last to first) then the update will cause a violation of the
index
On May 2, 2007, at 23:01 , Naz Gassiep wrote:
I'm trying to do an update on a table that has a unique constraint
on the field, I need to update the table by setting field = field+1
however if this does not perform the updates on the table in a proper
order (from last to first) then the
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On May 2, 2007, at 23:01 , Naz Gassiep wrote:
I'm trying to do an update on a table that has a unique constraint
on the field, I need to update the table by setting field = field+1
however if this does not perform the updates on the table in a proper
order
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On May 1, 2007, at 10:11 , Tom Lane wrote:
The Mini I bought last summer seems to have 7.3.10 installed on it.
Don't know where to look to determine the ARD version.
I should think you only have the Remote Desktop PostgreSQL server
installation
Are you building with the same compiler as the backend was built with? If
you're using the binary distribution that means mingw unless you're testing the
pre-beta snapshot Dave uploaded a few days ago.
/Magnus
--- Original message ---
From: Islam Hegazy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
36 matches
Mail list logo
