Easier would be just uing pg_dump -s >schema.sql to get all schema objects
so you could check them into subversion. If you want only specific
objects, pg_dump -l >listofobjects, then edit this list as you
like and use pg_dump -L listofobjects >someobjects.sql
The -l and -L options are not reco
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 00:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan Bond-Caron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It would be quite useful to implement a database queue. Although FOR UPDATE
> > NOWAIT and trying again can work as well as other techniques,
>
> > just skipping over the locks has its advan
MadHatter wrote:
If I have an expression (a or b)a where a=TRUE and b=FALSE, why is b
evaluated? Any true operand before an or operator means the entire
expression is true .
There is no "before" - PG makes no guarantee about evaluation order.
Don't forget a,b might well be subqueries and you
Csaba Nagy wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 00:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Jonathan Bond-Caron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> It would be quite useful to implement a database queue. Although FOR UPDATE
>>> NOWAIT and trying again can work as well as other techniques,
>>> just skipping over the l
Artacus wrote:
Easier would be just uing pg_dump -s >schema.sql to get all schema
objects
so you could check them into subversion. If you want only specific
objects, pg_dump -l >listofobjects, then edit this list as you
like and use pg_dump -L listofobjects >someobjects.sql
The -l and -L opt
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 16:23 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Especially if it returned an updated row count or supported the
> RETURNING clause, so you could find out after the fact what was or
> wasn't done.
Well, it is supposed to be used as "SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED",
so you can in fact pu
Hi All,
I would really appreciate if any one can help me out on the
problem that I am facing with PostgreSQL.
The following is the system (Dell laptop) configuration:
Windows XP - SP2, Intel Core 2Duo, 2GB RAM
PostgreSQL v 8.3.3
The scenario:
There are t
Csaba Nagy wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 16:23 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Especially if it returned an updated row count or supported the
>> RETURNING clause, so you could find out after the fact what was or
>> wasn't done.
>
> Well, it is supposed to be used as "SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOC
hi,
have a look at transaction isolation in docs
/tm
begin:vcard
fn:Thomas Markus
n:Markus;Thomas
org:proventis GmbH
adr:;;Zimmerstr. 79-80;Berlin;Berlin;10117;Germany
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+49 30 29 36 399 22
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.proventis.net
version:2.1
end
am Wed, dem 09.07.2008, um 16:32:11 +0800 mailte Bright D.L. folgendes:
> The scenario:
> There are two separate processes ? one (P1) inserting (not
> updating) data to a table at a high rate (around one record in 10ms) and
> another (P2) selecting the data from the same table for furt
Bright D.L. wrote:
> I would like to know why P1 can retrieve the data from the table while
> P2 can't.
At a guess: transactional visibility. P1 will have not yet committed its
transaction, so the data isn't visible to P2 yet. Remember, PostgreSQL
defaults to the READ COMMITTED isolation level an
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION listofemployeebasedondepartment(_id_dept
int)
RETURNS SETOF record AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
empdata record;
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY
SELECT
e.*, d.department_name
FROM
employee e, dept d
WHERE
e.id_dept = d.id AND
e.id_dept = _id_dept;
RETURN;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE 'plpg
Richard Huxton wrote:
Artacus wrote:
Easier would be just uing pg_dump -s >schema.sql to get all schema
objects
so you could check them into subversion. If you want only specific
objects, pg_dump -l >listofobjects, then edit this list as you
like and use pg_dump -L listofobjects >someobjects.
Hello,
what is the current status of the MSSQL to PostgreSQL tools/tips?
Google returns results as old as 2001...
The MSSQL database in question has only tables, no stored procedures, etc.
Thanks,
Iv
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Hi
I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point.
Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
--
Adrian Moisey
Systems Administrator | CareerJunction | Your Future Starts Here
am Wed, dem 09.07.2008, um 15:38:52 +0200 mailte Adrian Moisey folgendes:
> Hi
>
> I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
> After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point.
> Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Adrian Moisey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database. After
> that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point. Does
> postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
Sure. Che
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Adrian Moisey wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
> After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point.
> Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
Well, tran
Hi
I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point.
Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
Well, transactions do that. If you want to do this inside a
transaction, the term
am Wed, dem 09.07.2008, um 15:59:00 +0200 mailte Adrian Moisey folgendes:
> Hi
>
> >>I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
> >>After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point.
> >>Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do
Hi
I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point.
Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
Well, transactions do that. If you want to do this inside a
transaction, the term
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Adrian Moisey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
> After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point.
> Does
> postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for
Hi everyone,
I have the following sql script:
CREATE SEQUENCE "public"."teste_seq"
INCREMENT 1 MINVALUE 1
MAXVALUE 32767 START 1
CACHE 1 CYCLE;
CREATE TABLE "public"."teste" (
"id" SMALLINT DEFAULT nextval('teste_seq'::regclass) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT "id_pk" PRIMARY KEY("id")
)
Adrian Moisey wrote:
Hi
I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database. After
that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point. Does
postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
A crude way of doing it, which I've done in the past on t
x asasaxax wrote:
CREATE SEQUENCE "public"."teste_seq"
INCREMENT 1 MINVALUE 1
MAXVALUE 32767 START 1
CACHE 1 CYCLE;
What can i do to be able to continue inserting rows on this table?
Thanks a lot.
Make the max value of your sequence larger. A lot larger.
- Dan "Heron" Mye
x asasaxax wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>I have the following sql script:
>
> CREATE SEQUENCE "public"."teste_seq"
>INCREMENT 1 MINVALUE 1
>MAXVALUE 32767 START 1
>CACHE 1 CYCLE;
>
> CREATE TABLE "public"."teste" (
> "id" SMALLINT DEFAULT nextval('teste_seq'::regclass) NOT NULL
On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:38 AM, Adrian Moisey wrote:
I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that
point. Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me
to do this?
This seems to be exactly what tr
Iv Ray wrote:
Hello,
what is the current status of the MSSQL to PostgreSQL tools/tips?
Google returns results as old as 2001...
The MSSQL database in question has only tables, no stored procedures,
etc.
Thanks,
Iv
Hi Ray,
I have something that does this. I am currently awaiting project
Hello,
Consider two tables:
contacts:
cid integer primary key,
pid integer not null,
cpid integer
...
pinfo:
pid integer,
...
pinfo is a parent table with two partitions pinfo_p00 and pinfo_p01, all
three have primary keys on pid and partitions have proper constraints
that guarantee
Hope this is the right place to ask. Apologies if not.
Is pgmemcache still being actively supported/developed? I have
experienced a database crash with postgres 8.3.3 and pgmemcache 1.2beta1
Doing select * from pg_settings (with shared_preload_libraries defined
and no custom variable definition
Hello,
Blobs stores
large amount can you please tell me what is the limit i.e hw many kb of
data can it store ? say 4000k like that.
For suppose if a
4000kb data can be stored using blob and the data stored in blob is
3600k what about the remaining data? will it allocates a
I have the following simple regular expression:
"SELECT substring(addressline1 from '(^[0-9]+)') from addresses"
How could I find non-matches of this same pattern?
regards
Garry
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://ww
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/7/8 Matthew Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm likely overlooking something, but I can't seem to find a function to
> > sort a varchar array. Something like "select sort('{y,z,x}'::varchar[])"
> =>
> > {'x','y','z'}
Is there some business logic here for the cycling sequence / ID?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:00 AM, x asasaxax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>I have the following sql script:
>
> CREATE SEQUENCE "public"."teste_seq"
>INCREMENT 1 MINVALUE 1
>MAXVALUE 32767 START 1
>CA
You can probably use [^0-9]
-Said
Garry Saddington wrote:
I have the following simple regular expression:
"SELECT substring(addressline1 from '(^[0-9]+)') from addresses"
How could I find non-matches of this same pattern?
regards
Garry
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@po
|> -Original Message-
|> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
|> Garry Saddington
|> Sent: 9 juillet 2008 15:31
|> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
|> Subject: [GENERAL] regexp help
|>
|>
|> I have the following simple regular expression:
|>
|> "SELECT substrin
In order to use the --enable-thread-safety build switch I need to do a
manual build... UNLESS there is a way of doing this from the RPM command
line, which I have not been able to find. Where do I get 8.2.5-1? This
version came with my installation of Fedora 8 so I presume it is the version
I sho
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 15:38 +0200, Adrian Moisey wrote:
> I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
> After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that
> point.
> Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
* Transactions ;-)
*
Hi Ray,
I have something that does this. I am currently awaiting project
approval on pgfoundry.
It does tables, views, and stored procedures. I have tested it on
450,000 lines of mssql code
including 400 tables and 3700 stored procedures, although it is a work
in progress.
I applied last wee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Is pgmemcache still being actively supported/developed? I have
> experienced a database crash with postgres 8.3.3 and pgmemcache 1.2beta1
Yes and no. I just joined up, and hope to be submitting some patches
to it soon, as well as push to get
Iv Ray wrote:
Hi Ray,
I have something that does this. I am currently awaiting project
approval on pgfoundry.
It does tables, views, and stored procedures. I have tested it on
450,000 lines of mssql code
including 400 tables and 3700 stored procedures, although it is a
work in progress.
I a
Hello,
I created a Postgres table with a UUID. I want the UUID to be populated by
default.
Sample table:
CREATE TABLE "t"
(
token uuid NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT unique_token UNIQUE (token)
);
I tried out this post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-08/msg01452.php
CREATE TABLE t (
Gwyneth Morrison wrote:
Ray,
I think we tried that and I think it works but not for us. It may work
for you.
MS wants to copy all the tables over with exactly the same names
including [dbo]. and so on.
When it doesn't find an exact match, it wants to create the table. This
may be ok for you
On Jul 9, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Swaminathan Saikumar wrote:
Hello,
I created a Postgres table with a UUID. I want the UUID to be
populated by default.
PostgreSQL doesn't have built-in functions for generating UUIDs, but
there is a module in contrib that will do so:
http://www.postg
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In order to use the --enable-thread-safety build switch I need to do a
> manual build... UNLESS there is a way of doing this from the RPM command
> line, which I have not been able to find.
Uh ... whose RPM are you using? All the PG RPMs I know of
Hi,
Not sure if this the correct place to post this issue but hopefully
someone can help.
I am building a rpm for RHEL 5
The rpm contains a compiled version for postgresql-8.3.3 and tomcat
6 and java 1.6.
When i try to install the rpm on blank test system i get the
following depend
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:28 +1000, Jamie Deppeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this the correct place to post this issue but hopefully
> someone can help.
Any reason why you just wouldn't use:
http://www.pgsqlrpms.org
and
http://www.jpackage.org/
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> I am buil
There is a few reason why I am making this installer
1. Need to make a installer that just uses one rpm file
2. It needs to come with a prebuild database
3. Custom changes have been made to tomcat configuration
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:28 +1000, Jamie Deppeler wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 11:02 +1000, Jamie Deppeler wrote:
> There is a few reason why I am making this installer
>
> 1. Need to make a installer that just uses one rpm file
> 2. It needs to come with a prebuild database
> 3. Custom changes have been made to tomcat configuration
Fair enough :) bu
Adrian Moisey wrote:
Hi
I would like to be able to "mark" a point in my postgres database.
After that I want to change a few things and "rollback" to that point.
Does postgres support such a thing? Is it possible for me to do this?
>>> Well, transactions do that. If you want t
Jamie Deppeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am building a rpm for RHEL 5
> The rpm contains a compiled version for postgresql-8.3.3 and tomcat
> 6 and java 1.6.
> When i try to install the rpm on blank test system i get the
> following dependence issues
> libodbc.so is neede
Thank you Craig,
>At a guess: transactional visibility. P1 will have not yet committed
its
>transaction, so the data isn't visible to P2 yet. Remember, PostgreSQL
>defaults to the READ COMMITTED isolation level and does not offer READ
>UNCOMMITTED for those rare situations where you might want it.
>> The scenario:
>> There are two separate processes ? one (P1) inserting
(not
>> updating) data to a table at a high rate (around one record in 10ms)
and
>> another (P2) selecting the data from the same table for further
>>processing. P1
>> and P2 use separate connection to the Databas
Tried to use "ldd" but i am getting not a dynamic executable
Tom Lane wrote:
Jamie Deppeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am building a rpm for RHEL 5
The rpm contains a compiled version for postgresql-8.3.3 and tomcat
6 and java 1.6.
When i try to install the rpm on b
>hi,
>have a look at transaction isolation in docs
Thanks TM. I checked the isolation level of the DB and it is "read
committed". May be I will change it to 'Serializable' and check whether
that helps.
>/tm
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes
Bright D.L. wrote:
Processes P1 and P2 are executables developed in VC++. These are the
steps performed by P1 before sending the TCP packet (which acts as a
trigger) to P2.
1) Create an insertion query
2) Execute the query
3) Execute a 'Commit' command
4) Repeat 2 and 3 how many ever times neede
Hi,
I'm learning some 3-tier concept here and very interested with postgresql
stored-procedure
But since I 'm the type who learn from example, I'm having some difficulties
here
I want to know how postgresql use array as parameter for stored procedure,
I imagine a case when we want to save selli
>> Processes P1 and P2 are executables developed in VC++. These are the
>> steps performed by P1 before sending the TCP packet (which acts as a
>> trigger) to P2.
>>
>> 1) Create an insertion query
>> 2) Execute the query
>> 3) Execute a 'Commit' command
> 4) Repeat 2 and 3 how many ever times need
"Vyacheslav Kalinin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How come that outermost join expects 1515 rows given the row estimations of
> the inner and outer nested loop's parts?
I couldn't reproduce such a problem. What PG version are you running?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
"Bright D.L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> P1 did commit its insertion and verified it by successfully querying the
> last inserted data, before sending the TCP packet - the trigger - to P2
The fact that P1 can see data it inserted is no proof at all that it's
committed its transaction. I think
2008/7/9 Matthew Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2008/7/8 Matthew Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > I'm likely overlooking something, but I can't seem to find a function to
>> > sort a varchar array. Something like "sel
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 11:02 +1000, Jamie Deppeler wrote:
> There is a few reason why I am making this installer
>
> 1. Need to make a installer that just uses one rpm file
"Need" or "want"? I'd not maintain one RPM file that contains Tomcat5,
Java and PostgreSQL -- it would be PITA, imho. But of
Bright D.L. wrote:
>Once step 6 completes, can psql see the data?
Yes, P1 makes sure and is able to see the data before sending Packet to
P2.
Not P1, but psql. If you can see the data from psql, then your problem
has to be in P2. If you can't see the data from psql, then P1 is the
probl
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:28 +1000, Jamie Deppeler wrote:
> When i try to install the rpm on blank test system i get the
> following dependence issues
>
> libodbc.so is needed
> libodbcinst.so is needed
These both come from unixODBC package -- install that package first.
--
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 12:51 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In order to use the --enable-thread-safety build switch I need to do a
> manual build... UNLESS there is a way of doing this from the RPM
> command line, which I have not been able to find.
Did you install redhat-rpm-config RPM?
-HTH.
aravind chandu wrote:
> Blobs stores large amount can you please tell me
> what is the limit i.e hw many kb of data can it store ? say
> 4000k like that.
>
> For suppose if a 4000kb data can be stored using
> blob and the data stored in blob is 3600k what about the
> remaini
Hello
a)
create or replace function iterate(a int[])
returns void as $$
begin
for i in array_lower(a,1)..arry_upper(a,1) loop
raise notice '%', a[i];
end loop;
end;
$$ language plpgsql strict;
look to: http://www.pgsql.cz/index.php/PL/pgSQL_%28en%29 or
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/i
This is 8.3.0.
Here is the reproduce code:
create table contacts (
cid integer primary key,
pid integer not null,
cpid integer
);
create index ix_contacts_pid on contacts (pid);
create index ix_contacts_cpid on contacts (cpid);
create table pinfo (
pid integer,
constraint pk_pinfo pri
68 matches
Mail list logo
