Craig Ringer, 13.07.2010 05:11:
On 13/07/10 05:29, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
I would suggest to either manually change the autocommit mode from
within pg_upgrade or to add a note in the manual to disable/remove this
setting from psqlrc.conf before running pg_upgrade. Personally I think
the first o
On 07/12/2010 11:07 PM, Andrew Bartley wrote:
>
> I still need some way of finding redundant functions
A bit of a blunt instrument, but you could log all statements for a
while, and then grep through the logs using a list of all functions of
interest to see which ones never show up. Be wary of th
Hi Scott,
Although I can't guarantee for 100% that there was no RAID rebuild at some
point, I am almost sure that it wasn't the case. Two machines - the ones which
were already in production - exhibited this problem. Both of them were already
up for some weeks. Now, the reboot rather "fixed" on
Thanks Alexander,
Wish i had thought of that.
I still need some way of finding redundant functions
Thanks again
Andrew
On 13 July 2010 15:38, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hello.
> When we moved old projects from postgresql 7.x to 8.4, I just looked at
> modification time for files in base// .
Hello.
When we moved old projects from postgresql 7.x to 8.4, I just looked at
modification time for files in base// . So, I could
determine, that some databases were inactive (precisely,not updated) for
about a year and move them to archive...
Andrew Bartley wrote:
Is there an effective way
In response to Andrew Falanga :
> Hi,
>
> I just finished defining a couple of tables with PgAdmin III and I'm
> seeing something peculiar. I'm not sure what the problem is. When I
> connect to the DB using psql and do "\d " I get an error saying
> that there's not relations by that name. What?
Hi,
I just finished defining a couple of tables with PgAdmin III and I'm
seeing something peculiar. I'm not sure what the problem is. When I
connect to the DB using psql and do "\d " I get an error saying
that there's not relations by that name. What? When I do, "\d" I see
the tables listed.
Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mar jul 13 00:00:07 -0400 2010:
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 03:42 +, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: RIPEMD160
> >
> >
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >> * No trusted/untrusted versions
> > >
> > > This is false
On 08/07/10 17:42, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 8 Jul 2010, at 4:21, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's ancient. It is handled quite happily by \copy in csv mode,
>> except that when csv mode is active, \xnn escapes do not seem to be
>> processed. So I can have *either* \xnn escape processing *or*
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 03:42 +, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> * No trusted/untrusted versions
> >
> > This is false. There are both.
>
> Ah, good news, glad I was misinformed. I'm curious, what
> mechanism
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> * No trusted/untrusted versions
>
> This is false. There are both.
Ah, good news, glad I was misinformed. I'm curious, what
mechanism does it use for trusted?
>> * Not even in contrib or pgfoundry or github
> No. No
On 13/07/10 05:29, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> I would suggest to either manually change the autocommit mode from
> within pg_upgrade or to add a note in the manual to disable/remove this
> setting from psqlrc.conf before running pg_upgrade. Personally I think
> the first option would be the better o
On 12/07/10 21:03, Andras Fabian wrote:
> This STDOU issue gets even weirder. Now I have set up our two new servers
> (identical hw/sw) as I would have needed to do so anyways. After having PG
> running, I also set up the same test scenario as I have it on our problematic
> servers, and started
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote on 12.07.2010 21:34:
> > Thom Brown wrote:
> >> Could someone clarify the info in this paragraph:
> >>
> >> "Note that, due to a system catalog change, an initdb and database
> >> reload will be required for upgrading from 9.0Beta1. We encourage
> >> use
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Andras Fabian wrote:
> This STDOU issue gets even weirder. Now I have set up our two new servers
> (identical hw/sw) as I would have needed to do so anyways. After having PG
> running, I also set up the same test scenario as I have it on our problematic
> server
Thanks Greg,
It seems that the underlying stats tables are reset on a periodic basis, can
i stop this process? Is it a .conf setting? I have had a good look around,
nothing sticks out. If I can stop it, then i could use pg_stat_reset() then
monitor the stat views over an extended period without t
Andrew Bartley wrote:
Unfortunately these views only give me what appears to be a certain
time frame. This does not help all that much. It will give a list of
tables, indexes and sequences that have been used in the time frame,
so that is at least a start.
You can use pg_stat_reset() to set
Thanks Joe,
Unfortunately these views only give me what appears to be a certain time
frame. This does not help all that much. It will give a list of tables,
indexes and sequences that have been used in the time frame, so that is at
least a start.
It would be good if there was a timestamp (last
On 07/12/2010 02:40 PM, Andrew Bartley wrote:
> We have a large number of orphaned or redundant tables, views, and
> functions, due to many years of inadequate source management.
>
> We are running " PostgreSQL 8.3.7 on i486-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC
> gcc-4.3.real (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) 4.3.2 "
Hi all,
Our project has been running for 10 years now.
We have a large number of orphaned or redundant tables, views, and
functions, due to many years of inadequate source management.
We are running " PostgreSQL 8.3.7 on i486-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC
gcc-4.3.real (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) 4.3.2 "
Hi,
I'm trying pg_upgrade on my Windows installation and I have two suggestions
for the manual regarding pg_upgrade:
When specifying directories, pg_upgrade *requires* a forward slash as the path
separator. This is (still) uncommon in the Windows world (although Windows does
support it) and
Please don't top post.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Tom Wilcox wrote:
> On 12/07/2010 19:26, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 12 July 2010 14:50, Tom Wilcox wrote:
>>>
Hi Thom,
I am performing update statements t
I could perform the settings manually (set config, restart svr, execute
script, come back 2 days later, reset config, restart svr, execute more
script,...), but that sort of defeats the point. My aim to have the
simplest, automatic setup possible. Preferably completely contained
within PostgreS
Bruce Momjian wrote on 12.07.2010 21:34:
Thom Brown wrote:
Could someone clarify the info in this paragraph:
"Note that, due to a system catalog change, an initdb and database
reload will be required for upgrading from 9.0Beta1. We encourage
users to use this opportunity to test pg_upgrade for
Thom Brown wrote:
> Could someone clarify the info in this paragraph:
>
> "Note that, due to a system catalog change, an initdb and database
> reload will be required for upgrading from 9.0Beta1. We encourage
> users to use this opportunity to test pg_upgrade for the upgrade from
> Beta2 or an ear
Andres Freund wrote:
What you can change (and that makes quite a bit of sense in some situations)
is the "synchronous_commit" setting.
Right. In almost every case where people think they want to disable
fsync, what they really should be doing instead is turning off
synchronous commit--whi
Andras Fabian wrote:
- all fast servers show the COPY process as being in the state Rs ("runnable (on run
queue)")
- on the still slow server, this process is in 9 out of 10 samples in Ds ("uninterruptible sleep (usually IO)")
I've run into significant performance regressions in PostgreSQL
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 12 July 2010 14:50, Tom Wilcox wrote:
>> Hi Thom,
>>
>> I am performing update statements that are applied to a single table that is
>> about 96GB in size. These updates are grouped together in a single
>> transaction. This transaction runs
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:57 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 12 July 2010 14:50, Tom Wilcox wrote:
> > Hi Thom,
> >
> > I am performing update statements that are applied to a single table that is
> > about 96GB in size. These updates are grouped together in a single
> > transaction. This transaction
2010/7/12 Josip Rodin :
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:38:48PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2010/7/12 Josip Rodin :
>> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:06:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> >> Meh, personally I'll stick to the good old profiling methods "is it fast
>> >> enough", "\timing", and "explai
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:38:48PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/7/12 Josip Rodin :
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:06:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> >> Meh, personally I'll stick to the good old profiling methods "is it fast
> >> enough", "\timing", and "explain analyze".
> >
> > I agree. S
On 6 July 2010 16:36, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tim wrote:
>> I've had a website up for a couple of months and it's starting to get
>> these db timeouts as traffic has increased to say 1k pageviews a day.
>>
>
> Are you using any two-phase commit (ie, prepared transacti
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Kenichiro Tanaka
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I agree Ben.
> But,I try your question as an SQL puzzle.
> Doses this SQL meet what you want?
>
> select * from wantlast offset (select count(*)-10 from wantlast);
that works, but for any non trivial query it's not optimal becau
On Monday 12 July 2010 15:29:14 Tom Wilcox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to configure postgres from SQL?
>
> I am interested in turning off fsync for a set of queries (that take
> ages to run) and then turn fsync back on again afterwards.
disabling fsync is nearly never a good idea.
What you c
Le 12/07/2010 17:02, Tom Wilcox a écrit :
> Hi Thom,
>
> Yeah They can be divided up, but my main issue is that I would like
> these functions wrapped up so that the client (who has little to no
> experience using PostgreSQL) can just run a SQL function that will
> execute all of these updates and
Hi Thom,
Yeah They can be divided up, but my main issue is that I would like
these functions wrapped up so that the client (who has little to no
experience using PostgreSQL) can just run a SQL function that will
execute all of these updates and prepare many tables and functions for a
product.
2010/7/12 Josip Rodin :
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:06:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Meh, personally I'll stick to the good old profiling methods "is it fast
>> enough", "\timing", and "explain analyze".
>
> I agree. Some hint could be included in 'explain analyze' output, maybe just
> to sep
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:06:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Meh, personally I'll stick to the good old profiling methods "is it fast
> enough", "\timing", and "explain analyze".
I agree. Some hint could be included in 'explain analyze' output, maybe just
to separate the timings for things th
On Monday 12 July 2010 6:29:14 am Tom Wilcox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to configure postgres from SQL?
Yes to a degree, see here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/functions-admin.html
>
> I am interested in turning off fsync for a set of queries (that take
> ages to run) and t
On 12 July 2010 14:50, Tom Wilcox wrote:
> Hi Thom,
>
> I am performing update statements that are applied to a single table that is
> about 96GB in size. These updates are grouped together in a single
> transaction. This transaction runs until the machine runs out of disk space.
>
> What I am try
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to configure postgres from SQL?
>
> I am interested in turning off fsync for a set of queries (that take
> ages to run) and then turn fsync back on again afterwards.
There are things that can be changed at runtime using SQL - in that case
you may just type "SET enable_seqs
On 12 July 2010 14:29, Tom Wilcox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to configure postgres from SQL?
>
> I am interested in turning off fsync for a set of queries (that take ages to
> run) and then turn fsync back on again afterwards.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
You can only change that option in postgresql
Hi,
Is it possible to configure postgres from SQL?
I am interested in turning off fsync for a set of queries (that take
ages to run) and then turn fsync back on again afterwards.
Cheers,
Tom
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscri
This STDOU issue gets even weirder. Now I have set up our two new servers
(identical hw/sw) as I would have needed to do so anyways. After having PG
running, I also set up the same test scenario as I have it on our problematic
servers, and started the COPY-to-STDOUT experiment. And you know what
Could someone clarify the info in this paragraph:
"Note that, due to a system catalog change, an initdb and database
reload will be required for upgrading from 9.0Beta1. We encourage
users to use this opportunity to test pg_upgrade for the upgrade from
Beta2 or an earlier version of 9.0. Please re
Hello all,
One doubt about how PostgreSQL PITR works. Let us say I have all the
archived WALs for the past week with
archive_command = 'cp -i %p /home/postgres/archive/%f http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jayadevan M
wrote:
> Hi,
>>Because you didn't disable recovery_target_inclusive, I guess.
>>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/continuous-archiving.html#RECOVERY-TARGET-INCLUSIVE
> Thanks. I was almost sure this will fix it. But the issue seems to be
> so
Hi Tom (or others),
are there some recommended settings/ways to use oprofile on a situation like
this??? I got it working, have seen a first profile report, but then managed to
completely freeze the server on a second try with different oprofile settings
(next tests will go against the newly in
Hi,
>Because you didn't disable recovery_target_inclusive, I guess.
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/continuous-archiving.html#RECOVERY-TARGET-INCLUSIVE
Thanks. I was almost sure this will fix it. But the issue seems to be
something else. Even if I give a time that is a few more minutes
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Craig Ringer
wrote:
> It seems like a profiler, which is designed to filter and organize the
> collected data, and which can be attached only to specific functions that
> you want to know about, might be a better job. As there's already a PL/PgSQL
> debugger, some
2010/7/12 Craig Ringer :
> On 11/07/2010 5:46 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> any using a non simple expression is very slow - so there can be some
>> a warning when people use it. Sometimes people don't know (me too),
>> when use expensive expression
>>
>> for example
>>
>> rowvar := (10,20)
>>
>> i
51 matches
Mail list logo
