On 30 Jan 2011, at 17:14, Herouth Maoz wrote:
On 30/01/2011, at 12:27, Craig Ringer wrote:
OK, so you're pre-8.4 , which means you have the max_fsm settings to play
with. Have you seen any messages in the logs about the free space map (fsm)?
If your install didn't have a big enough fsm to
I'm seeing the following warning repeatedly in my postgres log. I'm
using PostgreSQL 8.4 on RHEL6.
Jan 29 04:49:57 myserver postgres[17308]: [3-1] user= db= host=
WARNING: skipping mytable --- only table or database owner can
vacuum it
mytable is owned by a non-superuser role which cannot
Hi,
I am trying to use bit(1) datatype with existing application that used int
datatype before.
So I tried to create implicit cast that will allow me not to make code
modifications and wanted to create implicit cast int2bit, but it turned out
that there is already system cast.
Unfortunately
Hi there,
I got out of shared memory error.
Searching on postgresql forums, I found this it occurs probably because of
intensive use of temporary tables in one transaction.
I'm locking in pg_locks table, and I found some rows with the following
modes: ShareLock, AccessExclusiveLock,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:19 PM, dennis jenkins
dennis.jenkins...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
My goal is to install a 64-bit build of the latest Postgresql 8.4
(not ready for 9.0 yet) onto a Solaris 10u9 server (Intel chips,
X4270), with dtrace support.
.../no-dtrace-postgresql,
asia123...@op.pl writes:
I am trying to use bit(1) datatype with existing application that used int
datatype before.
So I tried to create implicit cast that will allow me not to make code
modifications and wanted to create implicit cast int2bit, but it turned out
that there is already
Hi,
Is there an accepted way to load code in another language into a PostgreSQL
function body?
This would be really nice in several ways, for example: to run a code
checker outside of postgresql, and to make things easier for source code
colorizers.
I have in mind something like
The docs ( 9.0.2) for create table asserts that a data type representing a row
of
the table is automatically created.
Tain't clear to me what this means...
Here is a fragment of sql that I frequently use:
*
insert into checks (select *
from dblink('select * from checks where
Last night we were hit by the out of memory killer. Looking at the
following graph, you can clearly see unusual memory growth. This is a
database server running Postgres 9.0.0.
http://mediafly-public.s3.amazonaws.com/dbcluster02-master-month.png
We have another server, running Postgres 9.0.1
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Ben Chobot be...@silentmedia.com wrote:
Any advice? What should I be looking for?
Any particular reason you are running the OOM killer on a database server?
Why have the kernel set to overcommit memory in the first place?
Simply an oversight. That being
On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:55 AM, Bryan Murphy wrote:
Last night we were hit by the out of memory killer. Looking at the following
graph, you can clearly see unusual memory growth. This is a database server
running Postgres 9.0.0.
[snip]
Any advice? What should I be looking for?
Any
Jerry LeVan jerry.le...@gmail.com writes:
Here is a fragment of sql that I frequently use:
*
insert into checks (select *
from dblink('select * from checks where date =''1/1/2011''')
as (date date,
amount numeric(9,2),
tranid text,
source text,
On 31/01/2011, at 03:49, Craig Ringer wrote:
For approaches to possibly fixing your problem, see:
http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2010/10/17/reduce-bloat-of-table-without-longexclusive-locks/
http://blog.endpoint.com/2010/09/reducing-bloat-without-locking.html
I'm not quite sure what
Kenneth Buckler kenneth.buck...@gmail.com writes:
Does autovacuum automatically use the 'postgres' role?
It automatically uses the bootstrap superuser role.
If so, how can I change what role autovacuum uses?
You can't.
One of the security requirements
I've been required to implement
Hello,
the following function takes forever to execute as is. I see 'Inserting
original actions in temporary table' and nothing after that. If i
replace orig_user_id in the FOR loop with 1811 (the same orig_user_id
passed as the function parameter) it returns immediately correctly (the
table
Hello,
Two weeks ago I started a new open source software project (FireAlarm,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/firealarm/) which helps to detect
performance problems on Firebird SQL servers - by continuous analysis of
system tables which are very similar to the PostgreSQL Statistics Views.
Nicos Panayides ni...@magneta.com.cy writes:
the following function takes forever to execute as is. I see 'Inserting
original actions in temporary table' and nothing after that. If i
replace orig_user_id in the FOR loop with 1811 (the same orig_user_id
passed as the function parameter) it
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us napisał(a):
asia123...@op.pl writes:
I am trying to use bit(1) datatype with existing application that used int
datatype before.
So I tried to create implicit cast that will allow me not to make code
modifications and wanted to create implicit cast
Well, that's good news and bad news.
Good news...the application developers' jobs just got a little easier.
Bad news...I get to document why we can't meet this security requirement.
And yes, I agree, it's a pretty air-headed requirement. If I spent
less time chasing compliance, I might
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us napisał(a):
asia123...@op.pl writes:
I am trying to use bit(1) datatype with existing application that used int
datatype before.
So I tried to create implicit cast that will allow me not to make code
modifications and wanted to create implicit cast int2bit,
The 8.x version of PostgreSQL has been installed on my PC for quite few years.
It has been problem free until recently. The first problem I have is that a
connection can't be established after the PC just starts up although the DB is
started. I have to restart it to solve this problem each time
On 01/31/2011 12:49 PM, vwu98...@lycos.com wrote:
The 8.x version of PostgreSQL has been installed on my PC for quite few years.
It has been problem free until recently. The first problem I have is that a
connection can't be established after the PC just starts up although the DB is
started.
On 01/31/2011 01:18 PM, vwu98...@lycos.com wrote:
The DB connection problem has nothing to do with Hibernate. As I have said that
the problem can be solved by restarting the DB.
This problem occurs with my application as well as DdVisualizer.
So know we know it is a generic connection
We just had a slew of the following messages in our log. How concerned
should I be at this point? I have no idea what triggered it.
Version:
PostgreSQL 9.0.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc
(GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48), 64-bit
2011-01-31 14:16:13 PST [32767]: [1-1]
Hi,
I started trying to setup streaming replication here at work the first
of December but I didn't actually succeed until today. Too many other
crises to attend to ;-)
In the meantime, I now have 242 16MB files in pg_xlog/. The
archive_status directory in pg_xlog/has a matching .done
Jeff Ross jr...@wykids.org writes:
In the meantime, I now have 242 16MB files in pg_xlog/. The
archive_status directory in pg_xlog/has a matching .done file for all
but the most recent of those pg_xlog files.
What have you got checkpoint_segments set to?
Am I correct in thinking that I
Hi,
I've noticed that if I try to use generate_series to include the upper
boundary of int4, it never returns:
SELECT x FROM generate_series(2147483643::int4, 2147483647::int4) AS a(x);
But the same query with int8 returns instantly:
SELECT x FROM generate_series(2147483643::int8,
On 01/31/11 17:13, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Rossjr...@wykids.org writes:
In the meantime, I now have 242 16MB files in pg_xlog/. The
archive_status directory in pg_xlog/has a matching .done file for all
but the most recent of those pg_xlog files.
What have you got checkpoint_segments set to?
On Monday, January 31, 2011 3:32:16 pm Jeff Ross wrote:
Hi,
I started trying to setup streaming replication here at work the first
of December but I didn't actually succeed until today. Too many other
crises to attend to ;-)
In the meantime, I now have 242 16MB files in pg_xlog/. The
On 1 February 2011 00:15, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that if I try to use generate_series to include the upper
boundary of int4, it never returns:
SELECT x FROM generate_series(2147483643::int4, 2147483647::int4) AS a(x);
But the same query with int8 returns
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Actually, those lower bound errors aren't related to generate_series,
but I'd still like to know why -2147483648::int4 is out of range.
:: binds tighter than - (and everything else too). Write
(-2147483648)::int4 instead.
regards, tom
On 1 February 2011 00:36, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Actually, those lower bound errors aren't related to generate_series,
but I'd still like to know why -2147483648::int4 is out of range.
:: binds tighter than - (and everything else too). Write
On 1 February 2011 00:41, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 1 February 2011 00:36, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Actually, those lower bound errors aren't related to generate_series,
but I'd still like to know why -2147483648::int4 is out of range.
::
Situation: Disk usage on production server root filesystem is at 68%
utilization (80 GB used), on DR is at 51% (56 GB used). We use
SlonyII-1.2.x to keep the DR up to date. I would like to account for
the 24 GB difference.
Symptoms:
1. Database size reported by psql c '\l+'
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
I've noticed that if I try to use generate_series to include the upper
boundary of int4, it never returns:
I'll bet it's testing currval bound without considering the
possibility that incrementing currval caused an overflow wraparound.
We fixed a similar
On 1 February 2011 01:05, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
I've noticed that if I try to use generate_series to include the upper
boundary of int4, it never returns:
I'll bet it's testing currval bound without considering the
possibility that incrementing
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin
atsaloli.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Situation: Disk usage on production server root filesystem is at 68%
utilization (80 GB used), on DR is at 51% (56 GB used). We use
SlonyII-1.2.x to keep the DR up to date. I would like to account for
the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:28:36PM +0100, Michael Justin wrote:
While I am still new to PostgreSQL and have real world experience with
DB2 InterBase and Firebird only I am interested to write a similar tool
for PostgreSQL.
Maybe there are articles or discussions which help to get an
I migrated my DB from Postgresql 8.1 to Postgresql 9.0.1.
I have a table testtab
\d testtab
id int,
hours varchar
When I execute the following:
select sum(hours) from testtab
I get cast error.
Then,
I created following IMPLICIT CAST functions in my DB =
CREATE FUNCTION
Dear all,
I am not able to distinct these two datatypes ( Serial and Sequence ) in
Postgresql which resembles like auto-increment in Mysql.
Which one gets priority and When ?
The only thing I am able to find is to use SERIAL because if a drop
table occurs , still SEQUENCE memory is not
Hello
SEQUENCE isn't datatype. It is a database object. Simple object, that
can to generate unique integer numbers.
SERIAL is a fictive datatype. It can create a own SEQUENCE object and
can create a reference on this object.
pavel=# create sequence ;
CREATE SEQUENCE
Time: 461.883 ms
pavel=#
On 01/31/11 10:55 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Dear all,
I am not able to distinct these two datatypes ( Serial and Sequence )
in Postgresql which resembles like auto-increment in Mysql.
Which one gets priority and When ?
The only thing I am able to find is to use SERIAL because if a drop
42 matches
Mail list logo
