On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
>
>
> Another idea.
>
> I use CSF/LFD firewall.
>
> For TCP_IN, I have enabled "6432" port number.
>
> Do I also need to enable it elsewhere, such as TCP_OUT or UDP_IN etc?
>
Could you just try disabling the firewall for once?
Amitabh
On 11/19/11 11:42 PM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
I use CSF/LFD firewall.
For TCP_IN, I have enabled "6432" port number.
Do I also need to enable it elsewhere, such as TCP_OUT or UDP_IN etc?
does this firewall block localhost at all? many don't. (I'm not at all
familiar with this CSF/LFD thing)
Scott,
Thank you.
Just add them to the bottom then run
sudo sysctl -p
to make them take effect.
It seems that if this value is greater than RAM, linux kerner silently uses
max possible value.
Linuxes are used mostly to run PostgreSql only but ram may vary depending on
virtual maschine confi
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 09:32:12AM -0800, pawel_kukawski wrote:
> Is there any way I can store NULL character (\u) in string ?
>
> Or there is only one option that I have change every text field to bytea.
correct question is: why do you want to store \u in text field?
Best regards,
depe
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/19/11 11:42 PM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
>
> does this firewall block localhost at all? many don't. (I'm not at all
> familiar with this CSF/LFD thing)
>
> if you enable a port for TCP_IN, does it automatically allow replies back?
>
> pos
Hello,
I'm trying to add 1 week "VIP-status" to all users in a table:
update pref_users set vip = max(vip, now()) + interval '1 week';
but max() doesn't work with timestamps.
Is there maybe still a way to solve it with a one-liner?
Thank you
Alex
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pg
On 11/20/11 2:32 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
update pref_users set vip = max(vip, now()) + interval '1 week';
but max() doesn't work with timestamps.
max works fine with timestamps... however, its a 1 argument function
that takes an aggregate as its argument.
you perhaps want GREATEST(v
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> The password I am entering in the terminal is right for sure. I've
> tried it a few times, checked the caps lock, etc. Also, if the log
> carries this "FATAL password authentication failed", why does the
> terminal give the vague error "no wo
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Phoenix Kiula
> wrote:
> > The password I am entering in the terminal is right for sure. I've
> > tried it a few times, checked the caps lock, etc. Also, if the log
> > carries this "FATAL password authenticat
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Scott Mead wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Phoenix Kiula
>> wrote:
>> > The password I am entering in the terminal is right for sure. I've
>> > tried it a few times, checked the caps lock, et
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Scott Mead wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Phoenix Kiula
>>> wrote:
>>> > The password I am entering in the terminal is right for
Hi!
This seems to be the problem on Windows 2008 server, though starting with
'0.0.0.0' on Windows 2003 server worked fine.
I tried turning off IPv6 on the 2008 server to see if that has a effect,
but it still
behaved the same way after that change.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts on
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Dne 18.11.2011 13:30, Phoenix Kiula napsal(a):
>> Full DB: 32GB
>> The big table referenced above: 28 GB
>>
>> It's inserts into this one that are taking time.
>
> Hm, in that case the shared_buffers is probably too low. It'd be nice to
> h
Hi.
Want to start another thread, loosely related to the performance
problems thread I have going.
Need some DB design guidance from the gurus here.
My big table now has about 70 million rows, with the following columns:
alias | character varying(35)
url | text
modify_
I just got round to updating my laptop to ubuntu-10.4 (32bit), in part
because I kept hitting snags while trying to configure postgres 9.1.1.
The upgrade did in fact solve the dependency issues (though I was
surprised UUID came along with out the ossp specific impl??) but the
build is having
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Want to start another thread, loosely related to the performance
> problems thread I have going.
>
> Need some DB design guidance from the gurus here.
>
> My big table now has about 70 million rows, with the following columns:
>
>
>
partition your table if it is too big.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Nov 20, 2011, at 8:33, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Want to start another thread, loosely related to the performance
> problems thread I have going.
>
> Need some DB design guidance from the gurus here.
>
> My big table now has about 70 million rows, with the following columns:
>
>
> al
Rob Sargentg writes:
> I just got round to updating my laptop to ubuntu-10.4 (32bit), in part
> because I kept hitting snags while trying to configure postgres 9.1.1.
> ubuntu-10.4 is not the latest of course and comes with gnu make 3.8.1,
> but it seems to compile everything then fails to link
On 11/20/2011 09:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rob Sargentg writes:
>> I just got round to updating my laptop to ubuntu-10.4 (32bit), in part
>> because I kept hitting snags while trying to configure postgres 9.1.1.
>> ubuntu-10.4 is not the latest of course and comes with gnu make 3.8.1,
>> but it
Rob Sargent writes:
> On 11/20/2011 09:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It appears that on Ubuntu, libbsd defines those symbols, which confuses
>> configure into supposing that they're provided by libc, and then the
>> link fails because libbsd isn't actually linked into the postmaster.
>> The question i
Respected,
I have tried installing pgfincore with PG 9.1(one-click installer). But
facing below error.
[root@localhost pgfincore-v1.1]# export PATH=/opt/PostgreSQL/9.1/bin:$PATH
[root@localhost pgfincore-v1.1]# echo $PATH
/opt/PostgreSQL/9.1/bin:/usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:
I would like to store some in a single array some data that is
conceptually related, but some of the data is floating point, and some
of it is integer. Obviously the integer data *can* be stored as double
precision, but I need to know about potential loss of precision. Double
precision has "a p
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> How can I debug that the connections are the problem?
Take a look at pg_stat_activity, specifically the fields client_addr,
client_port, and client_hostname.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make ch
Lee Hachadoorian writes:
> And can I reliably retrieve the original integer by
> casting to int (or bigint) if the number of digits in the original
> integer is less than 15?
On IEEE-floating-point machines, I'd expect float8 to store integers
up to 2^52 (or maybe it's 2^53) exactly. With othe
2011/11/20 Raghavendra :
> Respected,
> I have tried installing pgfincore with PG 9.1(one-click installer). But
> facing below error.
> [root@localhost pgfincore-v1.1]# export PATH=/opt/PostgreSQL/9.1/bin:$PATH
> [root@localhost pgfincore-v1.1]# echo $PATH
> /opt/PostgreSQL/9.1/bin:/usr/lib/qt-3.3/
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 7:12:59 am Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Phoenix Kiula
wrote:
>
> I thought of adding a bigserial (serial8) column instead of
> varchar(32) for the md5. But postgresql tells me that:
>
> --
> ERROR: type "bigserial" does not exist
> --
>
On 11/20/11 1:29:37 PM, Lee Hachadoorian wrote:
I would like to store some in a single array some data that is
conceptually related, but some of the data is floating point, and some
of it is integer. Obviously the integer data *can* be stored as double
precision, but I need to know about potentia
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 3:56:18 am Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> > Any ideas?
>
> Just to add, the connection string I try for pgbouncer is EXACTLY the
> same as the one I use to connect directly to PG, but I add the port
> number.
That may be the problem. The Postgres server and pgbouncer are no
Hi all,
FOSDEM 2012 - PostgreSQL Devroom: Call for Speakers
The PostgreSQL project will have a Devroom at FOSDEM 2012, which takes
place on February 4-5 in Brussels, Belgium. The Devroom will mainly
cover topics for PostgreSQL users, developers and contributors. For more
information about t
On 21/11/11 02:33, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
Hi.
Want to start another thread, loosely related to the performance
problems thread I have going.
Need some DB design guidance from the gurus here.
My big table now has about 70 million rows, with the following columns:
alias | character v
On 20/11/11 11:57, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Gavin Flower
wrote:
On 19/11/11 11:32, Adam Cornett wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Gavin Flower
wrote:
On 18/11/11 04:59, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringerwrites:
On Nov 17, 2011 1:32 PM, "Tom Lane"wrot
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On Sunday, November 20, 2011 3:56:18 am Phoenix Kiula wrote:
>
>> > Any ideas?
>>
>> Just to add, the connection string I try for pgbouncer is EXACTLY the
>> same as the one I use to connect directly to PG, but I add the port
>> number.
>
>
>
Dne 20.11.2011 13:46, Phoenix Kiula napsal(a):
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> For a moment there, I unleashed the valve and allowed the INSERT
> functionality. The log was immediately flooded with this:
>
>
> LOG: duration: 6851.054 ms statement: select nextval('main
Dne 20.11.2011 12:52, Phoenix Kiula napsal(a):
> You may be on to something. And the queries results are below. (5
> connections are reserved for "superusers" so you may be right.)
>
>
> MYDB=# show max_connections;
> max_connections
> -
> 150
> (1 row)
>
> Time: 0.517 ms
>
>
Dne 21.11.2011 01:39, Phoenix Kiula napsal(a):
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Adrian Klaver
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, November 20, 2011 3:56:18 am Phoenix Kiula wrote:
>>
Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Just to add, the connection string I try for pgbouncer is EXACTLY the
>>> same as the one I use to co
Dne 20.11.2011 03:33, Amitabh Kant napsal(a):
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Phoenix Kiula
> Does the auth file (/var/lib/pgsql/pgbouncer.txt) contain valid login
> credentials to your database? If I remember correctly, it should have
> the username and password to your database.
No, it shou
You could also look into upgrading via pg_upgrade, if you don't want
to go through the dump/restore cycle. Even in that case if you can do
a test of pg_dump (one for schema, one for data) and make sure it
loads into the new db without any issues. 8.3 -> 9.0 is pretty
harmless (you might want to thi
Dne 20.11.2011 04:15, Phoenix Kiula napsal(a):
> I just did some testing.
>
> If the password is wrong, then it shows me the "authentication failed"
> message right in the terminal window, immediately.
>
> If the password is correct (plain text or md5 of that plain text --
> both have similar req
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Venkat Balaji wrote:
>> Question: what can I do to rsync only the new additions in every table
>> starting 00:00:01 until 23:59:59 for each day?
>
> A table level replication (like Slony) should help here.
> Or
> A trigger based approach with dblink would be an-ot
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Dne 20.11.2011 03:33, Amitabh Kant napsal(a):
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Phoenix Kiula
>>
>> Does the auth file (/var/lib/pgsql/pgbouncer.txt) contain valid login
>> credentials to your database? If I remember correctly, it should h
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Gavin Flower
wrote:
> How about having 2 indexes: one on each of ip & url_md5? Pg will combine the
> indexes as required, or will just use one if that is best.
Thanks Gavin. Question: what if I have a joined index? If from a
joined index I only use the first co
Dne 21.11.2011 02:44, Phoenix Kiula napsal(a):
> Thanks Tomas and everyone.
>
> I have the following passwords:
>
> 1. Pgbouncer.ini file
>
> [databases]
> MYDB = host=127.0.0.1 dbname=MYDB user=MYDB_MYDB client_encoding=utf8
> port=5432 password=='bypass'
>
>
> 2. In the auth_file (with auth
Hi,
On 21 November 2011 00:33, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Want to start another thread, loosely related to the performance
> problems thread I have going.
>
> Need some DB design guidance from the gurus here.
>
> My big table now has about 70 million rows, with the following columns:
You can
On 11/20/2011 02:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Lee Hachadoorian writes:
And can I reliably retrieve the original integer by
casting to int (or bigint) if the number of digits in the original
integer is less than 15?
On IEEE-floating-point machines, I'd expect float8 to store integers
up to 2^52 (or m
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Dne 21.11.2011 02:44, Phoenix Kiula napsal(a):
>> Thanks Tomas and everyone.
>>
>> I have the following passwords:
>>
>> 1. Pgbouncer.ini file
>>
>> [databases]
>> MYDB = host=127.0.0.1 dbname=MYDB user=MYDB_MYDB client_encoding=utf8
>> port
Just to follow up on this, I went with istgconstraint which seems to work
OK.
I didn't see any way to edit the generated restore files and then continue
the process. It would be nice if there was option to start (or stop) at
the time the files are written.
Although it ended up being quite simple
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Cédric Villemain <
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/11/20 Raghavendra :
> > Respected,
> > I have tried installing pgfincore with PG 9.1(one-click installer). But
> > facing below error.
> > [root@localhost pgfincore-v1.1]# export
> PATH=/opt/Postgr
On Nov 20, 2011, at 20:50, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Gavin Flower
> wrote:
>
>> How about having 2 indexes: one on each of ip & url_md5? Pg will combine the
>> indexes as required, or will just use one if that is best.
>
>
>
> Thanks Gavin. Question: what if I h
On 11/20/2011 11:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Rob Sargent writes:
On 11/20/2011 09:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
It appears that on Ubuntu, libbsd defines those symbols, which confuses
configure into supposing that they're provided by libc, and then the
link fails because libbsd isn't actually linked into
On 21/11/11 14:50, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Gavin Flower
wrote:
How about having 2 indexes: one on each of ip& url_md5? Pg will combine the
indexes as required, or will just use one if that is best.
Thanks Gavin. Question: what if I have a joined index? If fro
51 matches
Mail list logo
