Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 08/15/2013 10:59 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
The attached patches resolve the issue.
Should I forward the patches on to the pgsql-hackers list for review or is
this
list sufficient? (First time PostgreSQL hacker.)
Yes, any patches should be posted to
Stuart Ford wrote:
We have a problem on our development database server, which supports a PHP
application, which connects to it from a different server. Sometimes,
around 1 in 4 page loads, it fails and reports the following error message:
FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator
Thanks for your Answers,
my problem is, that there is no column with the name percentage.
Its just a result of my query. So how can I use it anyway?
ShouldI just store the result in a record variable and do another query?
Janek
Gesendet:Freitag, 16. August 2013 um 00:24 Uhr
Hello,
Use a view
Regards
From: Janek Sendrowski jane...@web.de
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] devide and summarize sql result (all)
Thanks for your Answers,
my problem is, that there
Have you tried putting those components in a common table expression?
I'm not sure if it absolutely forces the materialization or not, but in
practice that has been my experience.
Robert James wrote:
I have a query which, when I materialize by hand some of its
components, runs 10x faster
Hello,
I seem to recall seeing somewhere that you can turn on an option that
will let you see what the \ command actually run, but googling and doing
a quick scan of the docs didn't turn it up. Could someone assist me on
this?
Thanks,
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone:
On 08/16/2013 07:07 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
I seem to recall seeing somewhere that you can turn on an option that
will let you see what the \ command actually run, but googling and doing
a quick scan of the docs didn't turn it up. Could someone assist me on
this?
psql -E
On 08/15/2013 10:45 PM, S H wrote:
Any triggers on the table?
There are no trigger associated with this table.
FYI 8.1 is no longer supported.
I understand that. If there are some known related issues, it will be
easy to convince, Product mgmt team to upgrade the version of postgresql.
Basavaraj wrote
i have two unrelated tables as their is no common column to apply joins or
anything, so i want to join those tables...
I can understand being required to join them (for some unstated reason) but
a simple want does not seem a strong enough reason to go through the pain...
Why can't pg_get_triggerdef find the trigger using OID.
testdb=# SELECT
testdb-# p.oid,
testdb-# n.nspname as Schema,
testdb-# p.proname as Name,
testdb-# pg_catalog.pg_get_function_result(p.oid) as Result data type,
testdb-# pg_catalog.pg_get_function_arguments(p.oid) as Argument data
tcpdump and/or wireshark will help with detecting network issues.
Wireshark is a little easier to grok if you are not used to doing packet
dumps. http://www.wireshark.org/
Dennis
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Jayadevan M
On Aug 15, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Stuart Ford stuart.f...@glide.uk.com wrote:
Dear community
We have a problem on our development database server, which supports a PHP
application, which connects to it from a different server. Sometimes,
around 1 in 4 page loads, it fails and reports the
i have two unrelated tables as their is no common column to apply joins or
anything, so i want to join those tables using simple query(only two tables
should be used and no common table) can you pls help me out how to do that.
I am new user to postgres
this is table format
table1
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:01 AM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
Why can't pg_get_triggerdef find the trigger using OID.
testdb=# SELECT
testdb-# p.oid,
testdb-# n.nspname as Schema,
testdb-# p.proname as Name,
testdb-# pg_catalog.pg_get_function_result(p.oid) as Result data
Yeah, I have written that sort of query too, but with more info on tables and
the SQL you are unlikely to get much help
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 15, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Janek Sendrowski jane...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
My sql query results sth. like this:
user percentage
franz 78%
On Aug 15, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Andrew Berman rexx...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having an issue where streaming replication just randomly stops working.
I haven't been able to find anything in the logs which point to an issue, but
the Postgres process shows a waiting status on the slave:
Awesome, I'll give that a shot John.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:39 AM, John DeSoi de...@pgedit.com wrote:
On Aug 15, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Andrew Berman rexx...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having an issue where streaming replication just randomly stops
working. I haven't been able to find anything
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Berman rexx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Here is the full process list at the time it stopped working (I have changed
the actual username, db and IP for security). Would the idle in transaction
process be the culprit?
Most likely, yes. You should be
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Berman rexx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Here is the full process list at the time it stopped working (I have changed
the actual username, db and IP for security). Would the idle
Ok, next time it happens I'll try to do more sleuthing to figure out if
that's the issue. For now, I'm going to try adding --timeout=30 to the
rsync command and see if that fixes things.
Thanks again for your help!
Andrew
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com
Hello,
Is there a query out there where I can get a list of permissions associated to
a schema?
Something like the below query that I can do for a table, but for a schema
instead?
SELECT grantee, privilege_type
FROM
On 08/16/2013 10:27 AM, David Salisbury wrote:
Hello,
Is there a query out there where I can get a list of permissions
associated to a schema?
Something like the below query that I can do for a table, but for a
schema instead?
SELECT grantee, privilege_type
FROM
If I have a slow_function(), and I create an index of
slow_function(field), will Postgres use that index to avoid having to
recompute the function?
Example:
SELECT slow_function(field1) FROM table1 WHERE id = 5
It won't use the index on field1 to _find_ the record. Can it use it
to compute the
What's the best way to check if string a begins with string b?
Both a and b are coming from fields in a table.
Requirements:
* Either a or b might have special chars (such as '%') in them which
should NOT do anything special - they're just plain strings, not
regular expressions.
* a and b can
On 8/16/2013 6:35 AM, Basavaraj wrote:
finally the result shoule be
name| address|email|mobileNo|firstname|lastName|
--
abc some1mail1 1234564 def xyz
5 records | 10 records
|
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Robert James srobertja...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the best way to check if string a begins with string b?
Both a and b are coming from fields in a table.
Requirements:
* Either a or b might have special chars (such as '%') in them which
should NOT do
Robert James srobertja...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have a slow_function(), and I create an index of
slow_function(field), will Postgres use that index to avoid having to
recompute the function?
Example:
SELECT slow_function(field1) FROM table1 WHERE id = 5
It won't use the index on field1
I have a table that has around 8 million rows. The table has 71 columns
and 33 indexes.
The relevant indexes are:
callingpartynumber btree (CallingPartyNumber)
callingpartynumber_lower btree (lower(CallingPartyNumber)
text_pattern_ops)
My question is about the explain analyze output, below. In
Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com writes:
Robert James srobertja...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have a slow_function(), and I create an index of
slow_function(field), will Postgres use that index to avoid having to
recompute the function?
Example:
SELECT slow_function(field1) FROM table1 WHERE id
On 08/16/2013 02:12 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Yes, any patches should be posted to -hackers, in this case
with a archive reference to the discussion on -general.
Please readhttp://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
To make sure that the patch does not get lost, add it to
the next
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Our interpretation is that a bare column name (ORDER BY foo) is resolved
first as an output-column label, or failing that as an input-column name.
However, as soon as you embed a name in an expression, it will be treated
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:37 PM, BladeOfLight16
bladeofligh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Our interpretation is that a bare column name (ORDER BY foo) is resolved
first as an output-column label, or failing that as an input-column name.
1) What is your exact Postgres version i.e 8.1.5.?
V - 8.1.18
3) You also say it works fine in two environments, but not one.
What are the environments?
OS and version, memory, Postgres versions, etc.
It is working on most of the production system ( more than 100) but failed once
in one of
33 matches
Mail list logo
