On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:46:10AM +0100, Tim Clarke wrote:
On 22/05/15 09:40, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 23:42, Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net wrote:
You are right in the following aspect:
- client sends in NOW at HERE
- server knows HERE = UTC+2
And then the
On 22/05/15 09:40, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 23:42, Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net wrote:
You are right in the following aspect:
- client sends in NOW at HERE
- server knows HERE = UTC+2
And then the tectonic plate you're on shifts and you're suddenly in UTC+1 or
+3
2015-05-22 6:55 GMT+02:00 Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com:
Thanks for the report! This seems to be a bug.
This problem happens when WAL record is stored in separate two WAL files and
there is no valid latter WAL file in the standby. In your case, the former
file
is
On 22 May 2015 at 04:46, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
I did a litle research and it appears that neither Oracle nor db2 supports
the 0xff syntax ... so not _quite_ as common as it seemed to me.
With all that being said, if I were to build a patch, would it be likely
to be
2015-05-22 2:16 GMT+02:00 Venkata Balaji N nag1...@gmail.com:
It might be yelling about the WAL segment due to the delay in shipping it
from master to slave.
Do you have the restore_command set up in the recovery.conf file ? do you
have any automated job which is shipping WAL archives from
William Dunn wrote:
Just had an idea and could use some feedback. If we start a transaction,
leave it idle, and use
pg_export_snapshot() to get its snapshot_id MVCC will hold all the tuples as
of that transaction's
start and any other transaction can see the state of the database as of that
On 21 May 2015 at 23:42, Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net wrote:
You are right in the following aspect:
- client sends in NOW at HERE
- server knows HERE = UTC+2
And then the tectonic plate you're on shifts and you're suddenly in UTC+1 or +3
Thankfully, those things don't shift as
What you suggest is exactly the second option in the first message below but
that’s a real lot of overhead.
From: Melvin Davidson
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:48 PM
To: Nicolas Paris
Cc: Stefan Stefanov ; Forums postgresql
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] About COPY command (and probably file fdw
Hi,
I agree, pgloader seems to be right. And yes, it’s a matter of complexity and
usability estimation.
Stefan
From: David G. Johnston
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:19 AM
To: Nicolas Paris
Cc: Stefan Stefanov ; Forums postgresql
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] About COPY command (and probably file fdw
200 is a completely arbitrary value. At the time, I wanted to find indexes
that were sufficiently less used than most others in a highly queried
system. To find indexes that were never used, just change the value to 0.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Venkata Balaji N nag1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Melvin Davidson melvin6...@gmail.com
wrote:
Over the years I've wrote many scripts and queries to track the database
status. Recently I've had to convince a client who thought it was a good
idea to create indexes for every column on every table that it is
2015-05-22 skrev Albe Laurenz :
Nicklas Aveacute;n wrote:
I was a little surprised by this behavior.
Is this what is supposed to happen?
This query returns what I want:
with
a as (select generate_series(1,3) a_val)
,b as (select generate_series(1,2) b_val)
,c as (select
Hallo
I was a little surprised by this behavior.
Is this what is supposed to happen?
This query returns what I want:
with
a as (select generate_series(1,3) a_val)
,b as (select generate_series(1,2) b_val)
,c as (select generate_series(1,1) c_val)
select * from a
inner join c on
Nicklas Avén wrote:
I was a little surprised by this behavior.
Is this what is supposed to happen?
This query returns what I want:
with
a as (select generate_series(1,3) a_val)
,b as (select generate_series(1,2) b_val)
,c as (select generate_series(1,1) c_val)
select * from a
inner
Have you seen http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/talks/pgcon-2012.pdf ?
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Cory Tucker cory.tuc...@gmail.com wrote:
[pg version 9.3 or 9.4]
Suppose I have a simple table:
create table data (
my_value TEXT NOT NULL
);
CREATE INDEX idx_my_value ON data
Sorry to post this on the list, but I can't find any way of unsubscribing
-- I've looked in messages, on the community home pages and on a web
search, but all I find is a lot of other subscribers with the same problem.
How do I unsubscribe from this list, please?
On 22 May 2015 at 11:46, Nicklas
Tim,
You just need to go back to the mailing list page on the PostgreSQL website:
* Mailing list page: http://www.postgresql.org/list/
* Management page for subscriptions:
http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/subscribe/
While that URL says subscribe, on the page itself, there's a drop-down
Start here:
http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/subscribe/
Change the drop down from SUBSCRIBE to UNSUBSCRIBE and put in the rest of
the required information.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Tim Rowe digi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to post this on the list, but I can't find any way of
Over the years I've wrote many scripts and queries to track the database
status. Recently I've had to convince a client who thought it was a good
idea to create indexes for every column on every table that it is really a
bad idea. To do so, I wrote useless_indexes2.sql, which shows every index
Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 May 2015 at 04:46, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
With all that being said, if I were to build a patch, would it be likely
to be accepted into core?
Wouldn't you also need to support similar syntax for octal numbers for
the patch to
On 22/05/2015 06:09, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 05/21/2015 09:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
SELECT
extract (
YEAR
FROM
school_day ) AS YEAR,
Reformatting courtesy of pgFormatter(http://sqlformat.darold.net/).
FWIW I think this indenting of
You can already do that, natively in Linux/Mac by adding some simple tools to
try make Windows useful:
cat FILE | grep filter | psql -d DB -c copy ;
between grep, sed, tr, awk you can do almost any in-line filtering or text
manipulation you are likely to need. Or a bit of
On Fri, 22 May 2015 11:02:47 -0400
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 May 2015 at 04:46, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
With all that being said, if I were to build a patch, would it be likely
to be accepted into core?
On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:44:40 -0400
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Other questions you'd have to think about: what is the data type of
0x; what do you do with 0x (too big
On Fri, 22 May 2015 11:27:49 -0500
Dennis Jenkins dennis.jenkins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 May 2015 at 04:46, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
With all that being
2015-05-22 6:55 GMT+02:00 Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com:
This problem happens when WAL record is stored in separate two WAL files and
there is no valid latter WAL file in the standby. In your case, the former
file
is 00044C4D0090 and the latter is 00044C4D0091.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 May 2015 at 04:46, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
With all that being said, if I were to build a patch, would it be likely
to be accepted into core?
How
Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Other questions you'd have to think about: what is the data type of
0x; what do you do with 0x (too big
even for int8). And it'd likely behoove you to check how Microsoft
answers
Sent that on pgsql-novice list but did not get any answers yet.
Maybe someone could help me understand here J
Hi all,
I have split a large table (billions of records) into multiple partitions,
hoping the access would be faster. I used an ID to make partitions check
(check (id = 100
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Begin jfd...@hotmail.com wrote:
But how constraint exclusion would react with the following queries …
b- Select * from parent_table where id between 2345 and 6789; --
using a range of ids
Not sure...
These are constants but I'm not sure how
30 matches
Mail list logo
