mailing lists for comments or suggested
changes. If you have comments, please email them to
coc-comme...@postgresql.org no later than 2017-03-05, 11:59PM GMT for
the committee to review.
Regards, Dave.
--
Dave Page
PostgreSQL Core Team
http://www.postgresql.org/
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
forget we
support platforms other than Windows).
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Okay. For psqlODBC, the dependencies only include gettext and OpenSSL.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>&g
gt; script. Do we want to add all the OpenSSL header files? That must be around
> 75..
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> Sandeep, how much effort is it to do this?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Craig Ringer
>> wrote:
&
to use
> OpenSSL, gettext, etc its self.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: ht
If you're from the US and are planning to come to FOSDEM in February,
can you ping me please?
Thanks.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (
Also for PGAdmin and database drivers?
No, there are no plans to do so.
> Aparantly there are major issues with sideloading in windows 8.
We've seen no problems in our testing, and I haven't seen anything on
the -bugs list. If you see any specific issues, please report th
ctually works before running the
> initdb script, and if it doesn't, check %COMSPEC% to see if it really
> points to cmd.exe .
Interesting - thanks for the info Craig. Sandeep; can you please look
into adding such a check to the installer. We already test the
VBscript interpreter, so th
server 2008 box.
>
> I appreciate your help.
>
> Regards
>
> Hugh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Page [mailto:dp...@pgadmin.org]
> Sent: 15 August 2012 16:30
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Loughrey, Hugh; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GE
emember it is pretty tricky to call pg_ctl from a Windows batch
> file. I know the Windows installers do it somehow --- you might want to
> downlaod it and see if you can find the shell script they use. Dave
> Page might know more --- CC'ing him.
You shouldn't try to start/stop
terprisedb.com/ba/foss-licenses
>
> Now, this doesn't directly mention the installer, which is gone at the
> time this is installed. I know it has the same license as Postgres, but
> where is that documented. Dave, any ideas?
The installer code uses the PostgreSQL licence.
our reply, please include
> any (human) language which you are familiar with. There will be a small icon
> with the language on your badge.
I'll be there as you know. I speak English (UK, none of that US variant :-p ).
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.co
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Dave Page, 04.10.2011 21:46:
>>
>> We updated our build system to use BitRock 7 today (for unrelated
>> reasons) which has new features for ACL management. We're going to
>> investigate replacing cacls/icacls
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 03:46 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> Oh, the joys of supporting Windows :-)
>
> It's funny: for an OS with so relatively few "flavours" and versions, the
number of quirks and bizarre behaviors i
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote on 03.10.2011 10:11:
>>>
>>> Karl; can you please provide precise details of your Windows version,
>>> and anything unusual about
seDB who will
discuss PostgreSQL's role in the post-Oracle era.
So, if you haven't done so already, head on over to the website at
http://2011.pgconf.eu/registration/ to register as an attendee to
avoid missing out on what promises to be an outstanding conference in
an fantastic location. See
ete
> correctly.
> The database cluster initialisation failed.
>
I very much doubt that s the issue being discussed here. I'd suggest
starting a new thread on pgsql-bugs and including your installation logs
from %TEMP%.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @p
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Dave Page wrote on 03.10.2011 10:11:
>>
>> Karl; can you please provide precise details of your Windows version,
>> and anything unusual about your disk configuration? I know this
>> doesn't happen on any o
ia
> image. To the best of my knowledge there have been no OEM
> modifications of any kind. It describes itself as "Windows 7
> Enterprise", and says it is 32-bit. That's it.
>
> Anything else you'd want me to check?
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 3,
l about your disk configuration? I know this
doesn't happen on any of the installations of Windows 7 that we use
for testing (which tend to be the MSDN builds, running on local NTFS
disks), so I wonder if there's an icacls bug in a specific build or
rev of Windows, or when used on a certain
itter to help with his
efforts. He's one of the project's webmasters and sysadmins and also
contributes to related projects such as pgAdmin. In his spare time, he
serves as President of the Board of PostgreSQL Europe.
Regards, Dave.
--
Dave Page
PostgreSQL Core Team
http://www.postgresql
hows pgAdmin v1.12.1 (even source code is'nt newer). So "Please
> upgrade..." is just a standard text?
Yes, until we get to the point in development when we're happy to call
the new version supported in any way.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitt
o the boss, fill out those pesky travel requisition forms,
and head on over to the registration page!
http://2010.pgday.eu/register
--
Dave Page
PostgreSQL Europe
http://www.postgresql.eu/
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscrip
rise version with 1000 new features, and a corresponding
community version with just one of those features.
And after 5 years (nearer to 4 now I guess), those commitments get
thrown away entirely.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enter
e future versions under whatever terms they see
fit.
Other entities, do have to use the GPL if they release their own updates.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-gen
he tarballs coincided with PGWest, so I couldn't do
them then and now have to catch up on a bunch of work. To make matters
worse, the pgAdmin build has changed somewhat on Windows and requires
some effort to update the installers to work again.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blog
normally because it's not
in compliance with a security policy on the system - almost always
related to password complexity, or age/reuse. You could try creating
the account manually in advance.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.en
ction server), I will note that Hiroshi
Saito has ported ossp-uuid to Win64 now, and we're working on getting
it included in the next update of PG 9.0.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Compa
I mean that the tool was developed to help tune application
queries, in which the data transfer time can be just as important as
the query execution time. With cursors, you lose that information.
Of course, patches to make optional use of cursors would be interesting to us.
--
Dave
he
> scrollbar.
That is basically how it works (MVC), albeit without using cursors;
for both the reason you state and because part of the point of the
tool is to tune queries and using cursors to do that completely messes
up any timings we might get.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnak
t have any idea how or why it works as it does. We
just know we need the runtimes it installs.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-genera
o already, head on over to the website and
register your attendance at the conference. You won't regret it!
Website: http://2010.pgday.eu/
Schedule: http://2010.pgday.eu/schedule
Registration: http://2010.pgday.eu/register
See you in Stuttgart!
--
Dave Page
PostgreSQL Core Team
http://www.
ing Postgres.
It's not a PostgreSQL issue - the underlying library ossp-uuid doesn't
support 64 bit Windows.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general maili
2bit unless you're using the 32bit
Postgres build (it's built along with the rest of the server, so...).
What version of Python do you have? A quick glance at the build script
shows we're using 2.6, and we always use the ActiveState builds.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blog
ht it was ssl renegotiation, but not I am unclear what is causing
> the disconnection.
It's possible - it depends on what version of OpenSSL was available at
the time we started testing 9.0.
Dharmendra, can you please check and upgrade the build servers if necessary?
--
Dave Page
B
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Mike Christensen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Mike Christensen
>> wrote:
>>> Okay I found one that I can use..
>>>
>>> One question.. Should th
o, what user account will it find the
> .pgpass file under? Thanks!
Have the script start pgagent under the postgres account eg;
su - postgres -c 'p/path/to/pgadmin'
Then it should be able to use postgres' pgpass file. Don't put the
password in the connection string!
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mike Christensen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Mike Christensen
>> wrote:
>>> Sorry, it looks like it defaulted to the wrong DB. I created the
>>> schema in
;ll need to put together a startup script for your OS, if the
debian/ubuntu packager hasn't done so already. I'd suggest copying one
from /etc/init.d and tweaking it as required.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterpri
to believe that there should be a "Jobs" tree
> in pgAdmin created.. But I see nothing. Thanks!
Did you setup the database per the part of the docs prior to that section?
The "next steps" are most certainly there - see the index page at
http://www.pgadmin.org/docs/1.12/pg
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 13 October 2010 12:35, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Ron Mayer
>> wrote:
>>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>> 2010/10/8 Carlos Mennens :
>>>>> I know that MySQL uses MyI
tely close to the ease with which you can plugin a different
storage engine in MySQL, and would take a significant amount of
engineering expertise and effort.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgr
the same,
> except for replacign the Mongo guy with MySQL and the MySQL guy with
> PostgreSQL. That might be more apopros all around ;)
Someone did indeed do that:
http://nigel.mcnie.name/blog/mysql-is-a-database (also nsfw, iirc)
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @
d you can create databases implies that
the server is at least installed and running.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.or
re linking to libuuid.so.
> Dave?
Because that's what comes with ossp-uuid 1.6.2, and I assume is what
configure chooses when we use --with-ossp-uuid:
[buildf...@bf2-linux ~]$ uuid-config --libs
-luuid
FYI, there was also a bug in the installer which didn't copy the
library properly,
those particular ones have
an unusual ACL on them which caused our pre-installation actions to go
haywire. If such a problem occurs with the installation path, you
should get a regular "permission denied" error.
Regards, Dave.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitte
enting at the conference.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.p
#x27;s up because when I look at my path statement it shows
> c:\windows\system32 when I do either a path or set from the command line run
> inside CMD.exe.
>
> At least I know that it's not a Postgres issue now.
Very odd. Permissions perhaps?
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.b
inistrator account.
Can you post the installation log from %TEMP% please? See
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Troubleshooting_Installation#Collect_the_installer_log_file
for details.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
T
n screen.
> Message boxes continue to apper even if status window is closed.
>
> How to fix ?
Run pgAdmin 1.12.1, not a release candidate.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Com
rom a root command prompt:
/opt/PostgreSQL/9.0/stackbuilder/bin/stackbuilder &
I assume the same would work on Debian, though you might need to use
sudo as with Ubuntu. The installers aren't supported on Debian though,
so I don't know if it'll work.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsn
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Andrus wrote:
>>> How to configure automatically Linux and Mac servers ?
>>
>> Run the tuning wizard on them?
>
> Where to find installation packages for Debian and Ubuntu ?
Installers can be downloaded in StackBuilder.
wrote it yet. And I'm not sure we'd want it in pgAdmin
anyway as such functionality is somewhat outside the realm of what
pgAdmin does.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent v
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Craig Ringer
wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 06:30 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>> As for 2, I suspect that somewhere in the installer, it walks down the
>>> path
>>> to the TEMP directory, and fails at the junction because it cannot read
&
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Dave Page wrote:
>
>> So, it sounds like there are two questions for me to figure out - why
>> is the installer not able to follow the link and find the files (which
>> is probably a question for BitRock), an
For the benefit of the list, I've raised this issue with the people
who supply the installer technology, as I can't see any reason why our
code would get this wrong.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>
>> A couple of questions for
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
>>> Hi Dharmendra,
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply. This kind of errors, which cannot be reproduced
>>> o
build, but not the 64 bit build.
>
> Is this an oversight, or is there some problem with the library on Windows
> x64?
The underlying uuid-ossp library isn't supported on Win64, so we can't
build the contrib module unfortunately.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
ny log files.
Please look for any logfiles in %TEMP% starting with "bitrock".
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgres
ch time as
we can figure out a way to make it work - if that's even possible.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-genera
starter configuration, that will be based on your
selected workload type and machine resources. That may be fine for
your needs, or you may need to tune it to more precisely meet the
needs of your actual workload. It doesn't claim to eliminate the need
for any future manual tuning.
--
Dave Pa
to be downloaded on that platform. I've
fixed that - it should be available within an hour or so.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-genera
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Scott Ribe wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> You're welcome. I guess it is running the 64bit image - is your
>> machine Leopard Server?
>
> That's irrelevant. The 32-bit vs 64-bit default is for the
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Larry Leszczynski wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:35 +0100, "Dave Page" wrote:
>>
>> > I recently installed PostgreSQL 9.0.0 on Mac OS X 10.5.8. PL/perl will
>> > not load because it is looking for Perl 5.10 in th
lding the 64
bit binary:
CFLAGS="-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk
-mmacosx-version-min=10.5 -O2 -arch x86_64" ./configure
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent
this.
The logfile may have a name starting bitrock_, if the installer didn't
get a chance to rename it to install-postgresql.log. Without it,
there's not really anything I can suggest.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.ent
of the target system. What OS is it, is
it on a domain etc?
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
interesting point. pg_upgrade won't work, because OSX will
automatically run the 64bit part of the Universal binaries with 9.0,
where the 8.3 or 8.4 versions would have been 32bit.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
e that Postgres is running as a 32-bit application while
> I have a 64-bit machine and OS (OS X, Snow Leopard.)
The 9.0 release supports 32 and 64 bit Intel machines.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Pos
> I first used /usr/local/libxml2/include/ which did not work. Doing a find
> for parser.h made me change the include path.
> Could possibly the version of libxml2 be an issue: 2-2.7.7 ???
>
> Thx: Peter
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:
bxml2/libxml/libxml/parser.h, which I
suspect is wrong. Try removing the extra "/libxml" from the include
path.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mail
stick with 32bit Postgres + Npgsql, ODBC, OpenSSL, slony2 and
>> libxml2, libpq.
>>
> Also note that PostgreSQL 9.0 will be available natively 64-bit on Windows.
Yeah, but Slony/PostGIS won't.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB
in Inkscape) and PNG formats, updated with
this years info as a starting point. Please let me know if you're
going to work on something.
Thanks!
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
<><>
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (
which
is not always accurate (for all but the smallest of tables).
Right-click the table and select the count options to get an exact
count.
Normally, a large mismatch between those two values is a sign you need
to vacuum the table. That may well not be the case if you're suffering
from corr
SQL
> debugger, some of the infrastructure required is already present.
There's already a profiler in the same source tree. It just needs to
be given a little love.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general maili
at http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.3.11/win32/,
but it's not binary-compatible with the one-click installers
(different integer-datetime settings).
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (p
e the ActiveState distros of Python, Perl and TCL on
Windows (and on the Linux builds from 9.0), but others should work
too, provided they're the correct major version.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general maili
such an issue before now. And that's
ignoring the vast amount of testing that goes into every release,
including on 32 and 64 bit versions of XP through 7 and 2003 through
2008R2.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
-click PostgreSQL installers, you can run StackBuilder
to automatically install preconfigured builds of Apache, PHP and phpBB
to work with the PG installation.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsq
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:28 PM, MD wrote:
> I found out the libpq.lib come with Postgres installer (8.4.4) is not
> thread-safe. Where can I find a thread-safe build?
It's always thread-safe on Windows.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postg
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Jim Montgomery wrote:
> Remove me from your email chain.
You need to unsubscribe from the mailing list. Until now your weren't
explicitly included on any of the messages that I can see.
http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/
--
Dave Page
Enterpr
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:22 AM, A. Kretschmer
wrote:
> In response to Dave Page :
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>> > Didn't PostgreSQL used to have more than 1 storage engine in the past?
>> > I thought I read somewhe
Yes, many, many moons ago.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
ave
thus preventing it from being as well optimised as Postgres.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
team, Robin Schumacher, who spent many years working
in a senior product management position at MySQL.
http://www.enterprisedb.com/learning/postgresql_vs_mysql.do
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
each for each platform your
customers use, and upgrades can no longer be pure SQL scripts, as
you'll also need to ship new object files and install them on the
database server.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-ge
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Joshua D. Drake
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 22:18 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> > I have no problem with him trying to protect his hard earned work. I
>> > just think he is trying to solve the wrong problem.
>>
>> It'
en Source world, as there's nowhere to hide a key or obfuscation
algorithm. If akp geek is able to use EnterpriseDB builds of Postgres,
then he may want to look at PL/Secure, which will obfuscate his
pl/pgsql code:
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pl_secure_standard_server.do
--
D
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Tom Wilcox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I use the apt-get facility on Ubuntu is that supposed to get the
> appropriate postgres version for my OS setup (i.e. 64-bit and Python 2.6) ?
I would assume so. I'm more of a Redhat guy though.
--
Dave Pag
re being built against ActiveState's Perl,
Python and TCL distros, so it will be easier to use those PLs in the
future.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.o
g does perhaps give us a clue. Ashesh - would you mind
investigating further please?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
Log started 06/15/10 at 01:01:06
Preferred installation mode : qt
Trying to init installer in mode qt
Mode qt suc
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:47 PM, M. Bashir Al-Noimi wrote:
> On 14/06/2010 08:43 م, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:22 PM, M. Bashir Al-Noimi wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> As shown in the following screenshot I couldn't insta
right version (VC++ 2005 SP1) of the runtimes
installed, you could run the installer with the option:
--install_runtimes 0
to skip the runtime installation. If you don't have them, or have the wrong
version, the installer will almost certainly fail later on.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:
y not complete correctly
> Error reading file
> D:/amber/program/postgresql/8.4/data/postgres.conf
> When start the service, the following entry is written in windows event log
>
> "D:/Amber/Program/PostgreSQL/8.4/data/postgresql.conf": No such file or
> directory
>
>
n see
> this message.
/ works just fine on Windows.
What is the actual problem you are seeing, as opposed to the perceived cause?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
Psqlodbc already supports 64bit. We just need to package it for win64.
On 5/13/10, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 19:08 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Joshua D. Drake
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:15 +0100, D
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Igor Neyman wrote:
> Will 9.0 also have 64-bit ODBC driver?
Eventually.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to y
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Igor Neyman wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> Are there any plans to build 8.4... As 64 bit for Windows?
8.4 cannot be built for 64 bit Windows. Thats only supported with 9.0 and above.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterpr
ostgreSQL 64 bits for windows?
Not yet. It's being worked on.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>> On 5/2/10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not so sure it's fair to the users though.
>
> Well, we did promise that Windows 8.2 would have the same lifespan as
> 8.2 on other platforms:
> htt
On 5/2/10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Sofer, Yuval wrote:
>>> PG "FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (key=5432001,
>>> addr=0210): Invalid argument.
>>>
>>> The version is 8.2.4, the
1 - 100 of 660 matches
Mail list logo
