, statecode FROM WildLife WHERE
state_pt = ' || statecode INTO ...;
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/plpgsql-statements.html
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
out of topic, but a small correction here:
Oracle's analog of WAL files is RedoLog files, and they rollback
segments (or newer UNDO tablespace) is separate from RedoLog files.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
memory area called
temp_buffers, try to play with this configuration parameter.
And, yes there is a 1GB files size limit (not only for temp files),
that's why you see .1, .2, ... In the file names.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
Indexes don't maintain counts, indexes maintain pointers to the table
records.
What you need is materialized view storing aggregates.
And it looks like you already have it with your triggers.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
...
Which PG creates automatically (behind the scene), when view is created.
Is there a way, or did anyone try to modify this Rule?
It is after all DO INSTEAD Rule.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
report.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
for any hints
Alex
Based on your PG version there are different solutions to your problem.
Not to re-invent the wheel, check this article:
http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/archives/191-String-Aggregation-in
-PostgreSQL%2C-SQL-Server%2C-and-MySQL.html%23extended
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent
,
ha.last_refresh_date as d3 from tbl1 a join tbl2 ae on
a.id_anuncio_externo = ae.id_anuncio_externo join tbl3 ha on
a.id_anuncio_externo = ha.id_anuncio_externo) q;
should do it.
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription
.
It's part of pgstattupple contrib module - read it up in the docs.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
given a solution: INSERT with RETURNING clause.
Check PG documentation regarding this clause.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
FROM gr_counts C, gr_counts D
WHERE D.groupid C.groupid
AND D.count C.count;
This will execute:
SELECT groupid, COUNT(*) AS CNT
FROM A
GROUP BY groupid
only once.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
From: Ashesh Vashi [mailto:ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 1:32 AM
To: Igor Neyman
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Dave Page
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] problem with PG install script
indices need to be updated, because Postgres does not do upgrade in
place, like some other databases do.
When any column is updated, new version of the row created and the old
one marked as deleted.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
, so
please correct me if my code modification is wrong.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
(NEW.*);
DELETE FROM crm_active WHERE crmid = NEW.crmid;
RETURN NULL; -- so that that trigger doesn't proceed
with UPDATE on crm_active table
ELSE
RETURN (NEW.*);
END IF;
END;
$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
Sorry, for being late to this conversation.
Possibly it works for SQL Server, because SS has SQL_VARIANT data type
(kind of anytype).
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
only Stand by slave to remove
overhead caused by slony due to triggers (also the slave was
always lagging in case of bulkloads on master) in the hope
of speeding up the process.
Any help would be much appriciated ...
With Regards
sandy
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql
table1
GROUP BY field1, field2
ORDER BY field1) AS q1
INNER JOIN table2 ON ( ... )
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
of fixing it.
However, I wanted to share this little tidbit with the
PostgreSQL community.
Raymond
What you need for your update to work is deferred unique constraints.
I think, this feature appears in 9.0.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
of Administrators group.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
across
the most popular SQL databases. I also explicitly don't want
to create an extra tree ID or something like that, because it
only mitigates the problem of anomalies, but does not solve it.
Thanks in advance,
Jason.
Look up connectby() in tablefuncs contrib module.
Regards,
Igor
backpatching 8.4, when 9.0 Beta3 was
released.
So, backpatched to 8.4 - does it mean that we can expect new 8.4
release (8.4.5) that will include these patches in near future?
And if yes, then - when? Will it coinside with 9.0 release?
Thank you in advance,
Igor Neyman
different from what OP asked.
Jen wants to avoid getting error on CREATE TABLE in case her table
already exists (but proceed with CREATE TABLE, if it doesn't).
What you suggest, will drop the table (IF EXISTS), and then create it
anew - what if there is already data in the table?
Regards,
Igor Neyman
'postgres', instead of the PostgreSQL-specific
application data folder (f.e., C:\PostgreSQL\8.4\data).
It results
in some unexpected bugs.
Could you please be more specific in describing what
problems are you
seeing on Win7?
Regards, Igor Neyman
What files are being created
\PostgreSQL\Installations\postgresql-8.4
folder?
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
-Original Message-
From: dario@libero.it [mailto:dario@libero.it]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:38 AM
To: vibhor.ku...@enterprisedb.com; Igor Neyman
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: R: Re: [GENERAL] postgres user password: Log on failure
Hi guys,
Thanks
it... I spent quite some
time to find out out to fix this log on failure).
Dario
Does this XP has a policy set up, that requires every login to change
it's password every so often (say 30 days, or whatever)?
If so, exclude postgres account from this policy.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via
-Original Message-
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott.marl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 4:15 AM
To: A. Kretschmer
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: default ordering of query result - are they
always guarantee
...
. drop original table
4. rename intermediate table to original name
5. re-created required indexes (and any other objects dependent on this
table)
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
Will 9.0 also have 64-bit ODBC driver?
Igor Neyman
-Original Message-
From: Dave Page [mailto:dp...@pgadmin.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:34 AM
To: Igor Neyman
Cc: Luis Guillermo Dangel; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Question about Beta for Windows 64 bits
(arg1 table.column%TYPE ...
Which, AFAICT, is not possible.
It is definetily possible, i.e:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION myMaxCycle(i_n_Cell_id GP_CELL.cell_id%TYPE)
RETURNS GP_CYCLE.cycle_date_time%TYPE
AS $$...
Works in my 8.2 PG.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
not violate uniqueness of your constraint.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
on.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise
Postgres Company
Dave,
Are there any plans to build 8.4... As 64 bit for Windows?
Regards,
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription
entity/rule you are trying to
implement here, it'll be easier to help you.
Igor Neyman
-Original Message-
From: Dino Vliet [mailto:dino_vl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 7:32 AM
To: r...@iol.ie
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: join two tables without a key
See attached attached OneClick_PG_Installer notes.
Igor Neyman
-Original Message-
From: John Gage [mailto:jsmg...@numericable.fr]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 3:44 AM
To: sachin.srivast...@enterprisedb.com
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 1-Click installer problems
What's the complete error message?
Vacuum is using maintenance_work_mem. What is your setting
maintenance_work_mem compared to your RAM size.
Igor Neyman
-Original Message-
From: akp geek [mailto:akpg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:10 PM
To: Joao Ferreira gmail
reference to this fix beeing backported into 8.2.
So, was it or was it not backported into 8.2.5?
Magnus, sorry for sending this message to you directly (as well as to
the list), but it's a really hot issue for me.
Regards,
Igor Neyman
Joe,
What PG version are running?
8.2 here complains when running your example:
ERROR: column foo.name does not exist
LINE 6: select foo.name from foo;
^
** Error **
ERROR: column foo.name does not exist
SQL state: 42703
Igor Neyman
-Original Message
When in doubt - test.
Why not remove index in MySQL (or create index in PostgreSQL) and see
what happens.
Why trying compare apples and oranges?
Igor Neyman
-Original Message-
From: Yang Zhang [mailto:yanghates...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:37 PM
To: Richard
sales as s WHERE s.modelnumber LIKE 'GH77%')
AS results
JOIN customers as c ON (results.customerid = c.customerid)
GROUP BY results.customerid, c.customername
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
return NEW, not
NULL (OLD - for on delete trigger):
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION r.m_t()
RETURNS trigger AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
INSERT INTO temp_m_t VALUES (NEW.*,1+1); RETURN NEW; END;
$BODY$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org
IT.
**
Original poster asked for the sql that will touch inventory table only
once.
Your statement (with 3 subqueries) will do it 3 times.
Igor Neyman
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Hello,
Let's say TableA has toastable column, the contents of this column is
stored in let's say pg_toast_1234.
Is there a query to find which records (chunk_id, chunk_seq) in
pg_toast_1234 store data for specific record in TableA (i.e. with PK
column value eq. '567')?
Igor Neyman
This question didn't get any traction on admin list, so I'll try
here:
I want to analyze the entire database with the exception of several
tables.
When I run VACUUM ANALYZE (or vacuumdb -z) on the database, how can
I exclude specific tables from being analyzed?
Is there any place in system
objective.
Igor Neyman
-Original Message-
From: Gauthier, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:14 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: That was easy
I just ported my whole DB instance, 4 db's inside with roles, triggers, stored
procedures, etc... from
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Teslenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 6:57 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Strange query plan
Hello!
I have following table:
CREATE TABLE table1 (
field1 INTEGER NOT NULL,
field2 INTEGER NOT
Read about dynamic sql in Postgres documentation (EXECUTE statement):
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/plpgsql-statements.html
Igor
-Original Message-
From: Anderson dos Santos Donda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:10 PM
To:
Easy: you've got 3 Ifs without END IF:
IF uppergt = 'BOD' THEN RETURN 0 ;
IF uppergt = 'MOD' THEN RETURN 86400/2 ;
IF uppergt = 'EOD' THEN RETURN 86399 ;
Igor
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:19 PM
To:
This document:
http://www-css.fnal.gov/dsg/external/freeware/mysql-vs-pgsql.html
could answer some of your questions.
Igor
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Tokmatchi
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL
201 - 249 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
