Re: [GENERAL] Creating GUID

Seems that none of them is same as MS GUID. > Linux-only? Seems so, damn currently use windows for developement. "David Garamond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chris Gamache wrote: > > You want > > http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/uniqueidentifier/projdisplay.p

[GENERAL] Creating GUID

Hi, How to generate GUID("f741d0ce-351c-4c8d-9625-d23765ca7f45") values in postgre ? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [GENERAL] Commercial postgresql

> These things are quite important when you have to convince your boss :-) Convincing boss just say: "Caugh board or use postgresql". Meaning of this is that you can't compare comercical or free ware. Probably you want to use postgre because of its free, if this isn't case why you won use oracle

Re: [GENERAL] Functions have 32 args limt ???

"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Ivar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Are there any real pefrormance difference, what are actual difference(%), > > have somebody measured even it ? > > You still haven

Re: [GENERAL] Functions have 32 args limt ???

TED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ivar wrote: > > I don't see why default is so small. > > > > Did you even bother to look at the thread I referred to? > > There was a lengthy discussion on the pros and cons of various default > settings, and the co

Re: [GENERAL] Functions have 32 args limt ???

>I'd suggest looking at the mailing list archives What I must look for ??? "Stephan Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Ivar wrote: > > > I don't see why default is so small. > > Re-re

Re: [GENERAL] Functions have 32 args limt ???

There are different datatypes and does odbc supports arrays ? "Dennis Gearon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It might be possible to use an array. Ivar wrote: >It all depends what soft are you doing. > >There is for example material card

Re: [GENERAL] Functions have 32 args limt ???

ALIAS FOR $35; --,@KASTIS numeric(18,3) =NULL -- Cœhikut Kastis (Konteineris) BEGIN "Dennis Gearon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ivar wrote: > > >I don't see why default is so small. > > > >"Joe Conway" &

[GENERAL] Functions have 32 args limt ???

Hi, For my supprise I found that functions have 32 parameter limit. Where to find more info about this limitation or similar limitations ? I need at least 50, 100 would be ok. Real life function below: CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION wpr_KA_I_PersonCard_Doc(int,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varc

Re: [GENERAL] Is there any place to get 7.4 win binaries ?

.4 isn't even in beta yet. > > -- - > > Ivar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any place to get 7.4 win binaries ? > > > > > > > > > > ---(end of broadcast)-

[GENERAL] Is there any place to get 7.4 win binaries ?

Hi, Is there any place to get 7.4 win binaries ? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

[GENERAL] bytea char escaping

Hi, What chars must be escaped in string and how exactly? LF -> \\n CR -> \\r ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[GENERAL] How to get subscribe-nomail to working ?

Hi, How to subscribe-nomail working or disable to send all messages to email ? Where is more info about newsgroup flags ? Sending subscribe-nomail newsgroup_ is rejected by server ??? Seems I'm only dumb who can't find it. ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [GENERAL] Is there any way to make post to newsgroups faster ?

Damn can't get working, all messages will come to email. "Ivar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Testing "set nomail" > > "Ivar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

Re: [GENERAL] Is there any way to make post to newsgroups faster ?

Testing "set nomail" "Ivar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yee works ok > > "Ivar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Test > > > > "Jeff Eck

Re: [GENERAL] Is there any way to make post to newsgroups faster ?

Yee works ok "Ivar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Test > > "Jeff Eckermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- Ivar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, >

Re: [GENERAL] Is there any way to make post to newsgroups faster ?

Test "Jeff Eckermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- Ivar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any way to make post to newsgroups faster ? > > At moment moderators must check it, while they chek &g

Re: [GENERAL] Problems with kerberos 4 authenication

Rodney McDuff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've compiled postgresql 6.3.2 with kerberos 4 support (using > the KTH-KRB Ebones distribution) on a Alpha running DU4.0D. I've been using KTH Kerberos IV with PostgreSQL for a long time, and it's always been working great, until very recently (

Re: [GENERAL] status on IPv6 implementation...

Lorenzo Huerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was just wondering if the IPv6 datatype has allready been > implemented on the current version of postgres. IPV4 will be in 6.4, but IPV6 won't. I've left comments and hooks all over the IPV4 implementation, marking where to extend it to support