On Thursday 15 January 2009 09:54:50 Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I have a PostgreSQL 8.3.5 server with max_connections = 400. At this
> moment, I have 223 open connections, including 64 from a bunch of
> webserver processes and about 100 from desktop machines running a
> particular appli
I've never really gone far into low-
level optimizations like this.
--
Kirk Strauser
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
t least see what the excitingment is
about.
--
Kirk Strauser
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
ny given
time. The database itself is currently hosted on a dual Xeon server
with 3GB of RAM and other applications so I'm sure the new 8-core/8GB
hardware is bound to do better at any rate.
--
Kirk Strauser
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
on, then get used all day, then closed at the end of the
afternoon. I'm starting to wonder if perhaps pgpool-II isn't what I
was looking for.
--
Kirk Strauser
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
to have a flag for "enable_pooling". Is "num_init_children"
effectively the same as a hypothetical "max_children?" If I set it to
"1" and leave "max_pool" at "4", then clients queue up while one at a
time gets to connect.
Sorry, I know this
e she waits for it to finish. Is that
true? Even if not, what would be the advantage in the two of them
sharing a connection?
I'm just trying to wrap my head around this. Thanks!
--
Kirk Strauser
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make chang
On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Kirk Strauser writes:
First, shmget is asking for a lot less than shmmax - why is it
failing?
Check to see if things work as expected when you have shmmax and
shmall
set to a shade less than 2GB and fail when they are a shade more. If
so, it
On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Kirk Strauser writes:
First, shmget is asking for a lot less than shmmax - why is it
failing?
Check to see if things work as expected when you have shmmax and
shmall
set to a shade less than 2GB and fail when they are a shade more. If
so, it
ration.
First, shmget is asking for a lot less than shmmax - why is it failing?
Second, does the "one fourth of RAM" rule of thumb still apply on
systems with decent amounts of memory?
Third, is there anything else I can be doing to take advantage of this
RAM and 8 CPU cores?
Thanks!
--
Kirk Strauser
On Friday 25 July 2008, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> is there anyone using PostgreSQL on FreeBSD 7.0 starting from scratch?
Every day.
> I compiled 8.3.3 and wanted to run initdb in my home directory but
> it fails with the error below.
How did you install PostgreSQL?
--
Kirk Straus
how this turned out.
--
Kirk Strauser
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
accept A903-35A9-76AF
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo