On Apr 16, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Susan Cassidy
susan.cass...@decisionsciencescorp.com wrote:
Is there any way to let a transaction see the inserts that were done
earlier in the transaction? I want to insert a row, then later use it within
the same transaction.
If not, I will have to commit
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Susan Cassidy susan.cass...@decisionsciencescorp.com writes:
Is there any way to let a transaction see the inserts that were done
earlier in the transaction?
It works that way automatically, as long as you're talking
On Apr 2, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Jacob Scott jacob.sc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hello there ;)
Does upgrading a a disk being used by postgres (9.1, on Ubuntu) with the
following process sound safe?
• pg_start_backup
• Take a filesystem snapshot (of a volume containing postgres
On Mar 27, 2014, at 5:29 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com
wrote:
On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:58 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
Yea, vacuum just marks space as available for reuse
On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:58 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
On 03/25/2014 04:52 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
Some more questions, what happens when things begin to dawn on me:)
You said the disk filled up entirely with log files yet currently the
number(size) of logs
On Mar 26, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014, Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a Postgres 9.3.3 database machine. Due to some
Hi everyone,
I have a Postgres 9.3.3 database machine. Due to some intelligent work on the
part of someone who shall remain nameless, the WAL archive command included a
‘ /dev/null 21’ which masked archive failures until the disk entirely filled
with 400GB of pg_xlog entries.
I have fixed
On Mar 25, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
On 03/25/2014 01:56 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a Postgres 9.3.3 database machine. Due to some intelligent work on
the part of someone who shall remain nameless, the WAL archive command
On Mar 25, 2014, at 4:02 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
On 03/25/2014 03:54 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Mar 25, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
On 03/25/2014 01:56 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a Postgres
On Mar 25, 2014, at 4:45 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
On 03/25/2014 04:17 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Mar 25, 2014, at 4:02 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
On 03/25/2014 03:54 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Mar 25, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Adrian
On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Daryl Foster daryl.fos...@oncenter.com wrote:
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.postgresql.geometric.PGpath cannot be cast
to org.postgresql.geometric.PGpath
That's a sure sign of ClassLoader confusion. Make sure there is only one copy
of the driver jar in
Hi everyone,
I’ve seen murmuring on the list regarding
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Nov2013ReplicationIssue
Is there an ETA on a release with the bug fix for this? I’m putting off
building from source because I prefer to use the pgdg RPM packages, but if we
don’t get a release soon it
On Dec 3, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Steven Schlansker stevenschlans...@gmail.com writes:
I’ve seen murmuring on the list regarding
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Nov2013ReplicationIssue
Is there an ETA on a release with the bug fix for this? I’m putting off
On Sep 26, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Craig Boyd craigbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Dmitriy,
Thank you very much for the reply!
Right...got the the data type...but how do I actually insert a binary string
into the column? What does the SQL look like?
For the moment assume I have the following bit of
On Sep 26, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Kohler Manuel manuel.koh...@bsse.ethz.ch
wrote:
Hi,
we are developing a Java based software with Postgres as a DB.
Could someone tell me if there will be a JDBC driver for 9.3 out soon or
is it safe and recommended to use the latest JDBC driver available?
On Sep 26, 2013, at 10:28 PM, mdr monosij.for...@gmail.com wrote:
create user import_dbms_user with password 'import_dbms';
create database import_dbms_db;
grant all privileg
However when I try to run psql from the command line:
psql -h localhost -U import_dbms_user -WI enter password
On Sep 25, 2013, at 6:04 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, François Beausoleil
franc...@teksol.info wrote:
Hi all!
I import many, many rows of data into a table, from three or more computers,
4 times per hour. I have a primary key, and the
On Sep 11, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Gregory Haase haa...@onefreevoice.com wrote:
I was trying to figure out how to get the following syntax to work:
echo select pg_start_backup('zfs_snapshot'); \\! zfs snapshot
zroot/zpgsql@test; \\ select pg_stop_backup(); | psql postgres
I do:
psql -c select
PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance: http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/184951030X
On Jul 18, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Pedro Costa pedrocostaa...@sapo.pt wrote:
Hi guys,
Can anyone tell me the best books about postgresql? Specialy about tunning
and querys performances
Thanks
Enviado do meu
On Jul 8, 2013, at 6:48 AM, Jov am...@amutu.com wrote:
netstat show nothing about the socket of the process,so I think the TCP
timeout took effect.so it is really wired.
Jov
blog: http:amutu.com/blog
2013/7/8 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On
On Jul 8, 2013, at 6:48 AM, Jov am...@amutu.com wrote:
netstat show nothing about the socket of the process,so I think the TCP
timeout took effect.so it is really wired.
Jov
blog: http:amutu.com/blog
2013/7/8 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On
On Jun 26, 2013, at 11:04 AM, pg noob pgn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There are some places in our application where unique constraint violations
are difficult to avoid due to multithreading.
What we've done in most places to handle this is to retry in a loop.
Generally it starts by
Hi everyone,
I assume this is not easy with standard PG but I wanted to double check.
I have a column that has a very uneven distribution of values. ~95% of the
values will be the same, with some long tail of another few dozens of values.
I want to have an index over this value. Queries that
On Jun 18, 2013, at 12:23 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 6/18/2013 12:17 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
1) The common value is not known at schema definition time, and may change
(very slowly) over time.
how could a value thats constant in 95% of the rows change, unless you
On Jun 18, 2013, at 1:49 PM, David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com wrote:
Steven Schlansker-3 wrote
At some point, the code changes, and CURRENT_VERSION gets incremented.
Rows then slowly (over a period of days / weeks) get upgraded to the new
current version, in batches of thousands
On Jun 18, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I assume this is not easy with standard PG but I wanted to double check.
I have a column that has a very uneven distribution
On May 15, 2013, at 11:52 PM, Thomas Kellerer spam_ea...@gmx.net wrote:
Sajeev Mayandi, 16.05.2013 07:01:
Hi,
Our company is planning to move to postreSQL. We were initially using
sybase where upsert functionality was available using insert on
existing update clause. I know there
On May 10, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Matt Brock m...@mattbrock.co.uk wrote:
Hello.
We're intending to deploy PostgreSQL on Linux with SSD drives which would be
in a RAID 1 configuration with Hardware RAID.
My first question is essentially: are there any issues we need to be aware of
when
On May 10, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
PostgreSQL configuration changes:
synchronous_commit = off
that's good info, but it should be noted that synchronous_commit
trades a risk of some data loss (but not nearly as much risk as
volatile storage) for a big
On May 10, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure that these numbers will end up being anywhere near what works
for you, but these are my notes from tuning a 4xMLC SSD RAID-10. I haven't
proven that this is optimal, but it was way better than the
On May 1, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Carlo Stonebanks stonec.regis...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
I have to ask myself, is it more likely that I have discovered some PG
anomaly in 9.0 that no one has ever noticed, or that the client has
accidentally launched the process twice and doesn't know it?
Given my
On Apr 30, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Carlo Stonebanks stonec.regis...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hi Tom,
There's nothing obviously wrong with that, which means the issue is in
something you didn't show us. Care to assemble a self-contained example?
Unfortunately, it happens erratically and very,
Hi everyone,
I have a large table (~150M rows) that keeps a version field. At any given
time, it is expected that the vast majority of the rows are on the current
version, but some may be missing.
To figure out all the missing our outdated values, I run a query along the
lines of
SELECT id
On Apr 22, 2013, at 12:47 PM, akp geek akpg...@gmail.com wrote:
pg_dump dbname -n schemaname -t table_name -Fc | split -b 500m -t table.dump
Since you split the files outside of the Postgres world, you have to combine
them again. Roughly,
cat table.dump.* table.dump.combined
pg_restore
On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the most common causes I've seen for this is linux's vm.*dirty*
settings to get in the way. Like so many linux kernel optimizations this
one looks good on paper but gives at best middling improvements with
On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Joe Van Dyk j...@tanga.com wrote:
On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote:
The other thought is perhaps there is a snap shot type concept. I don't
see it in the list of SQL commands. A snap shot would do exactly what it
sounds
On Feb 6, 2013, at 8:14 AM, Roberto Scattini roberto.scatt...@gmail.com wrote:
hi list,
we have two new dell poweredge r720. based on recommendations from this list
we have configued the five disks in raid10 + 1 hot spare.
You might mention a bit more about how your drives are configured.
On Feb 6, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Roberto Scattini roberto.scatt...@gmail.com wrote:
hi steven,
we have two new dell poweredge r720. based on recommendations from this
list we have configued the five disks in raid10 + 1 hot spare.
You might mention a bit more about how your drives are
we use prepared statements everywhere and this makes it
very hard
to use partial indices, which would offer us significant performance gains.
Does anyone know of any acceptable workaround? Is there continued interest in
maybe improving the PostgreSQL behavior in this case?
Thanks!
Steven
On Jan 18, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Adrian Klaver wrote:
How are they stored, as date and time type, strings, other?
Adrian,
ISO date and time.
A sample of the data would help also.
Example: 2012-10-29 | 10:19 |
On Nov 16, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
On 16/11/12 19:35, Shaun Thomas wrote:
Hey guys,
So, we have a pretty beefy system that runs dual X5675's with 72GB of RAM.
After our recent upgrade to 9.1, things have been... odd. I managed to track
it down to one
On Aug 23, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote:
With \timing set on, I run an update statement and it reports
Time: 0.524 ms
Is that really 0.524 ms? As in 524 nanoseconds?
0.524ms = 524000ns
Perhaps you meant microseconds?
0.524ms = 524us
If all
On Aug 19, 2012, at 8:01 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com
wrote:
I'm using Postgres hash indices on a streaming replica master.
As is documented, hash indices are not logged, so the replica does not have
On Aug 19, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 00:09 -0700, Steven Schlansker wrote:
I understand that the current wisdom is don't use hash indices, but
(unfortunately?) I have benchmarks that
show that our particular application is faster by quite
It is not possible to compile Postgres contrib/uuid-ossp on the newest release
of Mac OS X, 10.8
The specific compile error:
make -C uuid-ossp install
/bin/sh ../../config/install-sh -c -d '/usr/local/Cellar/postgresql/9.1.3/lib'
/usr/bin/clang -Os -w -pipe -march=native -Qunused-arguments
On Jul 30, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com writes:
It is not possible to compile Postgres contrib/uuid-ossp on the newest
release of Mac OS X, 10.8
This looks like some variant of the same issue that OSSP's uuid
package has had
I think it's pretty easy to show that timestamp+size isn't good enough to do
this 100% reliably.
Imagine that your timestamps have a millisecond resolution. I assume this will
vary based on OS / filesystem, but the point remains the same no matter what
size it is.
You can have multiple
I'm using Postgres hash indices on a streaming replica master.
As is documented, hash indices are not logged, so the replica does not have
access to them.
I understand that the current wisdom is don't use hash indices, but
(unfortunately?) I have benchmarks that
show that our particular
On Jul 6, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com wrote:
On Jul 5, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com writes:
Why is using an OR so awful here?
Because the OR stops it from
On Jul 5, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:
I note you've decided to rewrite this query as a union
SELECT * FROM account
WHERE user_id in
(SELECT user_id FROM account
WHERE id =
does it pick a sequential scan? Is this
an optimizer bug or have I missed something in my queries?
Thanks much for any advice,
Steven Schlansker
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
On Jul 5, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com writes:
Why is using an OR so awful here?
Because the OR stops it from being a join (it possibly needs to return
some rows that are not in the semijoin of the two tables).
Why does it pick a sequential
52 matches
Mail list logo
