On Monday 02 February 2004 07:31 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Is someone taking care about the fact that the pgdb.py shipped with
> 7.4.1 is the wrong version? What bail me out is the fact that the
> version pgdb.py shipped with 7.4.1 is a version *pre 7.3*; we
> add the same "bug" with the 7.3 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lamar Owen wrote:
| On Monday 02 February 2004 10:54 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
|
|>Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|>
|>>Is someone taking care about the fact that the pgdb.py shipped with
|>>7.4.1 is the wrong version?
|
|
|>There is no pgdb.py
On Monday 02 February 2004 10:54 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is someone taking care about the fact that the pgdb.py shipped with
> > 7.4.1 is the wrong version?
> There is no pgdb.py in the core PG 7.4.* releases. I suppose you
> are talking about a packa
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is someone taking care about the fact that the pgdb.py shipped with
> 7.4.1 is the wrong version?
There is no pgdb.py in the core PG 7.4.* releases. I suppose you
are talking about a packaging error in the RPM distribution. Lamar Owen
would be the ma
Is someone taking care about the fact that the pgdb.py shipped with
7.4.1 is the wrong version? What bail me out is the fact that the
version pgdb.py shipped with 7.4.1 is a version *pre 7.3*; we
add the same "bug" with the 7.3 and was not solved until the 7.3.2
distribution:
http://archives.postgr