At 10:15 31/08/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Actually I think netstat only shows open connections, not processes
>listening for connections. Does anyone know a (reasonably portable)
>way of seeing which port numbers are being accept()ed on?
>
netstat -a | grep LISTEN
works on most UNIX flavours
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Actually I think netstat only shows open connections, not processes
> listening for connections. Does anyone know a (reasonably portable)
> way of seeing which port numbers are being accept()ed on?
>
> regards, tom lane
how about ls
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 10:15:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > netstat did not list them as using a port,
>
> Actually I think netstat only shows open connections, not processes
> listening for connections. Does anyone know a (reasonably portable)
> way of seeing which port numbers are being acce
Travis Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, there were two other copies of postgress running, and at least one
> was tying up port 5432, but . . .
> I couldn't see them with 'ps' or 'ps -a',
ps -a only lists processes that it thinks are spawned from interactive
sessions. You need ps -ax to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Now I'm back in business, but I don't understand why they didn't show
> up in ps or ps -a.
from the 'ps' manpage:
aSelect all processes on a terminal, includ-
ing those of other users
xSelect processes without
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 07:30:36AM -0500, Travis Bauer wrote:
> Well, there were two other copies of postgress running, and at least one
> was tying up port 5432, but . . .
>
> I couldn't see them with 'ps' or 'ps -a', netstat did not list them as
> using a port, but it did list something as havi
Well, there were two other copies of postgress running, and at least one
was tying up port 5432, but . . .
I couldn't see them with 'ps' or 'ps -a', netstat did not list them as
using a port, but it did list something as having "Active UNIX domain
sockets," listing the tmp files I had deleted yes
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:33:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Travis Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm getting:
> > FATAL: StreamServerPort: bind() failed: Address already in use
> > Is another postmaster already running on that port?
> > If not, wait a few seconds and retr
