FYI, getting back to you, both /contrib/userlock and /contrib/dbmirror
were removed from the 8.2 source tree. They have been moved to
pgfoundry.
---
Charles Comiskey wrote:
> PostgreSQL 8.1.4 appears to have 2 GPL licensed
On 6/7/2006 4:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the same time, it strikes me that at least the userlock stuff, and
> maybe dbmirror as well, are candidates for pgfoundry rather than
> contrib/
We'd already agreed to move dbmirror to pgf
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > At the same time, it strikes me that at least the userlock stuff, and
> > maybe dbmirror as well, are candidates for pgfoundry rather than
> > contrib/
>
> We'd already agreed to move dbmirror to pgfoundry, but it just didn't
> get
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the same time, it strikes me that at least the userlock stuff, and
> maybe dbmirror as well, are candidates for pgfoundry rather than
> contrib/
We'd already agreed to move dbmirror to pgfoundry, but it just didn't
get done for 8.1. I had not thoug
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:50:46AM -0400, Charles Comiskey wrote:
> PostgreSQL 8.1.4 appears to have 2 GPL licensed files according to
> licenses embedded in the source. In both cases, the files have had a
I should like to point out (in addition to Peter E's comments) that
these are both files
Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 16:50 schrieb Charles Comiskey:
> PostgreSQL 8.1.4 appears to have 2 GPL licensed files according to
> licenses embedded in the source. In both cases, the files have had a
> history of discussion within the PostgreSQL forums. I'm hoping, through
> this question, to find
PostgreSQL 8.1.4 appears to have 2 GPL
licensed files according to licenses embedded in the source. In both
cases, the files have had a history of discussion within the PostgreSQL
forums. I'm hoping, through this question, to find more concrete
information that the GPL code is really approved t
