On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:11, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> The fact that it is pl/pgSQL? Seriously though, I think that pl/pgSQL is
> counter intuitive to some people and those of us who are coming from say a Perl
> background are going to be much more proficient in using pl/Perl then having
> to learn
Hello, I'm fairly new to PostgreSQL. Does anyone have a resource for setting
up plperl from scratch? The online documentation doesn't offer much help.
--
Jeff Boes vox 616.226.9550
Database Engineer fax 616.349.9076
Jeff Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recently upgraded from 7.0.3 to 7.1. Everything went fine until I went to
> install plperl using createlang. It throws the following error message:
> ERROR: Load of file /usr/local/pgsql/lib/plperl.so failed:
>/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i686-linux/auto/
I recently upgraded from 7.0.3 to 7.1. Everything went fine until I went to
install plperl using createlang. It throws the following error message:
ERROR: Load of file /usr/local/pgsql/lib/plperl.so failed:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i686-linux/auto/Opcode/Opcode.so: undefined symbol: Perl_save_vptr
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> I believe you could actually use a non-shared libperl.a on Intel Linux;
> just dike out the test for shared-ness in plperl's Makefile.PL.
> The reason it's there is we couldn't think of a direct test for
> position-independent code, which is the real requirem
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As far as I know, there is no simple way to test whether libperl.a is
> compiled as position independent code or not. But it would be fairly
> easy to test whether you can build a shared library using libperl.a,
> by writing a little test case which
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I believe you could actually use a non-shared libperl.a on Intel Linux;
>> just dike out the test for shared-ness in plperl's Makefile.PL.
>> The reason it's there is we couldn't think of a direct test for
>> position-independent code, which is the r
Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone got advice on building postgres 7.1 with PL/Perl support
> WITHOUT having one's perl installation built with a shared libperl.a?
Try repeating the Perl build with shared-lib selected and then just
installing the resulting libperl.so beside l
Is there available some more examples of writing functions in PL/Perl ?
In standard documentation there is only just 2 examples.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Adam
--
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
Hitesh Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need to be able to execute SQL commands from inside a plperl
> function and can't figure if I can do this. Also.. after executing
> the query I need to be able to grab the number of tuples returned
> and there values.. how would I go about doing this.
n.b. to clarify, i got PL/Perl working on RH Linux 6.2
am in the process of attempting to get it working on NT.
==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==
when i did what's described below, i had no problems at all with
PL/Perl (and, in fact, am using it for a couple of trig
when i did what's described below, i had no problems at all with
PL/Perl (and, in fact, am using it for a couple of triggers that
are lightly used in a production environment)
http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plperl/README?rev=1.2&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-
markup
you can
Hi,
I have done a little work concerning the famous PL/Perl compilation Error and
also into Interfaces/Perl5.
The confusing POLLUTE option is no more used to see these parts compiled.
I thinks it's now fully compatible with all Perl versions, yes Tom I use PPPort :-)
The way to put it into the
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gilles DAROLD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The problem is this will break on older copies of Perl.
>
> > This problem is solved by perl itself !
>
> Yeah, it is: there is a module called Devel::PPPort that isolates
> user C code from the incompatibilit
Gilles DAROLD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have take a look to the source code concerning PL/Perl, it seems that 2
>variables
have a bad call : errgv and na.
If you replace them by their normal call (in 5.6.0) PL_errgv and PL_na you will
>get
success to compile the lib
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Can you send me a patch?
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have take a look to the source code concerning PL/Perl, it seems that 2 variables
> > have a bad call : errgv and na.
> >
> > If you replace them by their normal call (in 5.6.0) PL_errgv and PL_na you will get
> > success to comp
Can you send me a patch?
> Hi,
>
> I have take a look to the source code concerning PL/Perl, it seems that 2 variables
> have a bad call : errgv and na.
>
> If you replace them by their normal call (in 5.6.0) PL_errgv and PL_na you will get
> success to compile the lib plperl.so.
>
> Also in
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alex Guryanow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [root@eaccess plperl]# perl Makefile.PL
>
> For recent Perl versions you need to do
> perl Makefile.PL POLLUTE=1
> instead. The src/pl Makefile would've done it that way for you,
> but it looks like that code patch didn't mak
Hi,
I have take a look to the source code concerning PL/Perl, it seems that 2 variables
have a bad call : errgv and na.
If you replace them by their normal call (in 5.6.0) PL_errgv and PL_na you will get
success to compile the lib plperl.so.
Also in Perl documentation you will find the answer f
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
