Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:35:18AM -0600, Cristian Prieto wrote:
>> Why not something like Mantis bug tracker? (http://www.mantisbt.org)
>
> Because according to that URL:
>
> Mantis is a php/MySQL/web based bugtracking system.
Actually, the newest version also supports Pos
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:35:18AM -0600, Cristian Prieto wrote:
> Why not something like Mantis bug tracker? (http://www.mantisbt.org)
Because according to that URL:
Mantis is a php/MySQL/web based bugtracking system.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive
: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Greg Stark wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I think debbugs is fairly close to what we'd need, for reasons stated
>>earlier:
>>
>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-05/msg011
Greg Stark wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I think debbugs is fairly close to what we'd need, for reasons stated
>>earlier:
>>
>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-05/msg01156.php
>>
>>(I think Bugzilla is *completely* the wrong tool for the Postgres
>>develo
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:14:37AM -0700, Russ Brown wrote:
> Has there ever been any discussion about moving away from CVS? We couldn't
> possibly go back to it now.
Many times. See -hackers archives.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive Software ht
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think debbugs is fairly close to what we'd need, for reasons stated
> earlier:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-05/msg01156.php
>
> (I think Bugzilla is *completely* the wrong tool for the Postgres
> development model.)
>
> I've h
On Tue, 2005-11-10 at 14:43 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> My personal favourite bug-tracker is debbugs, as used by the Debian
> Project. You can submit bugs by email, they get forwarded to
> maintainers (which can be a mailing list) via email. When they reply,
> the reply is also stored wi
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:23:45 -0700, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
But trac (http://www.edgewall.com/trac/ ) does support it. I'm running
it for quite a time and very much like it. Of course, trac is SVN only,
so this might be a show stopper unfortunately :(
Regards
Tino
-
On Oct 11, 2005, at 2:23 AM, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
But trac (http://www.edgewall.com/trac/ ) does support it. I'm running
it for quite a time and very much like it. Of course, trac is SVN
only,
so this might be a show stopper unfortunately :(
And there's Richard Hipp's CVSTRAC which seem
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 02:25, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> Am Montag, den 10.10.2005, 22:12 -0300 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
> > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Just as a suggestion/thought ... *if* you have the resources (or someone
> > else wants to step up to it), why no
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:27:04AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Or integrating them with the web. Not sure if any of the "popular
> bugtrackers" support that today, or if they all want to "be their own
> site" that we'd link to. That'd work, of course, but it'd be nicer to
> get something that a
Magnus Hagander schrieb:
I have thought about that, however I would at least at some
...
Or integrating them with the web. Not sure if any of the "popular
bugtrackers" support that today, or if they all want to "be their own
site" that we'd link to. That'd work, of course, but it'd be nicer
> > I have thought about that, however I would at least at some
> level want
> > a blessing. For example, if we did that would we do it with
> pgFoundry
> > bug tracking? Or would we use Trac? Or Bugzilla?
>
> I think the main thing that's killed previous proposals in
> this line is that we c
Magnus Hagander schrieb:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
...
Btw. how do you work with the WWW guys? I _never_ ever got any answer.
Post to the -www list... From what I can tell in the archives, you've
never posted there, so you probably posted to the wrong place. (Yeah, it
may n
On 10/10/05, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Old-timers will recall that we already had one bad experience with an
> early open-source bug tracker, which has left people a bit shy of the
> concept too. I think a large part of that had to do with confusion
> between the purposes of bug *repor
> > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> ...
> > Just as a suggestion/thought ... *if* you have the resources (or
> > someone else wants to step up to it), why not setup the bug
> tracker,
> > work with the -www guys on having the 'bug submission'
> stuff feed into
> > it, and get a
>
Am Montag, den 10.10.2005, 22:12 -0300 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
...
> Just as a suggestion/thought ... *if* you have the resources (or someone
> else wants to step up to it), why not setup the bug tracker, work with the
> -www guys on having the 'bug
Am Montag, den 10.10.2005, 19:33 -0500 schrieb Jim C. Nasby:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:20:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > J B wrote:
...
> IIRC the last time this was brought up it was violently shot-down on
> -hackers (and the fact that bugzilla didn't directly support PostgreSQL
> back
Well, if we're considering some kind of trial stage I don't see why we
couldn't setup a few different trackers and see what people think.
Of course, that could well be setting us up for a bickshed big enough to
play NFL football in...
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:10:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "J
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have thought about that, however I would at least at some level want a
> blessing. For example, if we did that would we do it with
> pgFoundry bug tracking? Or would we use Trac? Or Bugzilla?
I think the main thing that's killed previous proposals
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
IIRC the last time this was brought up it was violently shot-down on
-hackers (and the fact that bugzilla didn't directly support PostgreSQL
back then had nothing to do with it).
Yep, but you never know. Someday it just m
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
IIRC the last time this was brought up it was violently shot-down on
-hackers (and the fact that bugzilla didn't directly support PostgreSQL
back then had nothing to do with it).
Yep, but you never know. Someday it just may happen. The community g
IIRC the last time this was brought up it was violently shot-down on
-hackers (and the fact that bugzilla didn't directly support PostgreSQL
back then had nothing to do with it).
Yep, but you never know. Someday it just may happen. The community got
Linus to
stop using his email box for pat
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
J B wrote:
Guys,
I was interested in researching a few items regarding bug reports in
PostgreSQL, but I can't seem to find what the project uses as a bug
tracker. I see the web form and mailing list, but I can't imagine
they're not captured in some
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:20:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> J B wrote:
>
> >Guys,
> >
> >I was interested in researching a few items regarding bug reports in
> >PostgreSQL, but I can't seem to find what the project uses as a bug
> >tracker. I see the web form and mailing list, but I can't i
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 07:59:16PM -0400, J B wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I was interested in researching a few items regarding bug reports in
> PostgreSQL, but I can't seem to find what the project uses as a bug
> tracker. I see the web form and mailing list, but I can't imagine
> they're not captured in
J B wrote:
Guys,
I was interested in researching a few items regarding bug reports in
PostgreSQL, but I can't seem to find what the project uses as a bug
tracker. I see the web form and mailing list, but I can't imagine
they're not captured in some central repository.
Could someone point me in
Guys,
I was interested in researching a few items regarding bug reports in
PostgreSQL, but I can't seem to find what the project uses as a bug
tracker. I see the web form and mailing list, but I can't imagine
they're not captured in some central repository.
Could someone point me in the right dir
28 matches
Mail list logo
