am Mon, dem 08.10.2007, um 15:46:04 -0500 mailte Scott Marlowe folgendes:
> Actually CC to the sender is the norm on this list. I believe there
Okay, no problem. I'm knowing other lists like the german debian user
list and there is this CC to the sender unwanted.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
"Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A. Kretschmer wrote:
>
>> As far i can see your mails are correct. But one exclusion: please no
>> CC: to the sender, i'm reading the list.
>
> The additional CC: to sender is customary on these lists.
Generally it's just how Internet mailing lists w
On 10/8/07, A. Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> am Mon, dem 08.10.2007, um 12:00:30 -0700 mailte Richard Broersma Jr
> folgendes:
> > --- "A. Kretschmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > at least post them and see what kind of response you get,
> > > > > rather than judge the list as a
A. Kretschmer wrote:
> As far i can see your mails are correct. But one exclusion: please no
> CC: to the sender, i'm reading the list.
The additional CC: to sender is customary on these lists.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/
"How amazing is that
am Mon, dem 08.10.2007, um 12:00:30 -0700 mailte Richard Broersma Jr folgendes:
> --- "A. Kretschmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > at least post them and see what kind of response you get,
> > > > rather than judge the list as a whole due to the response you got to
> > > an
> > > > off-top
--- "A. Kretschmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > at least post them and see what kind of response you get,
> > > rather than judge the list as a whole due to the response you got to
> > an
> > > off-topic post. Many of the people on the lists have been here for
> > years and
> > > have gott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am Mon, dem 08.10.2007, um 13:05:50 -0400 mailte Bill Bartlett folgendes:
(Makes me have to think twice about raising
any _real_ issues though, like why my VACUUMs periodically keep
>> getting
into lock contention
am Mon, dem 08.10.2007, um 13:05:50 -0400 mailte Bill Bartlett folgendes:
> > > (Makes me have to think twice about raising
> > > any _real_ issues though, like why my VACUUMs periodically keep
> getting
> > > into lock contentions with my JDBC connections and ultimately
> causing me
> > > to have
"Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/8/07, Bill Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> (But I'm still not going to post the problem I've been
>> hitting recently running Postgres 7.4.1 on a SuSE 9.0 box -- somehow I
>> think the first few responses might be "get OFF that version
On 10/8/07, Bill Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Most people didn't completely read my email and thus unfortunately
> completely missed the point, in many cases seemingly because they were
> too quick to jump on my use of Outlook as an email client (thus assuming
> I was just one of "those"
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:25 PM
> To: Bill Bartlett
> Cc: 'Andreas Kretschmer'; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request: Anyone using bogus /
> &q
(Makes me have to think twice about raising
any _real_ issues though, like why my VACUUMs periodically keep
getting
into lock contentions with my JDBC connections and ultimately
causing me
to have to shut down Postgres w/ "pg_ctl stop -m immediate", or how to
properly handle postmaster errors
retschmer
> > > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 10:57 AM
> > > To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request: Anyone using bogus /
> > > "humorous" X-Message-Flag headers, could we please turn them off
> > >
> >
gt; Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request: Anyone using bogus /
> > "humorous" X-Message-Flag headers, could we please turn them off
> >
> >
> > am Fri, dem 05.10.2007, um 10:05:32 -0400 mailte Bill
> > Bartlett folgendes:
> > > Quick request to the gro
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 12:30 PM
> To: Bill Bartlett
> Cc: A. Kretschmer; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request: Anyone using bogus /
> "humorous" X
On 10/5/07, Bill Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm ... I still use "Pine" on some of my really old Linux boxes -- does
> this count? (Useful for reading CRON output...)
If you need / want the familiar interface of pine on a modern linux
box, look for cone.
Note that there's also an ope
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Kretschmer
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 10:57 AM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request: Anyone using bogus /
> "humorous" X-Messag
On Oct 5, 2007, at 10:56 , Bill Bartlett wrote:
* Given it's an X- header, doesn't that mean the meaning of
the value
is implementation dependent? What's "bogus" wrt Outlook may not be
wrt another mail system or client
* Doesn't this indicate that Outlook is broken (for some values of
broken)?
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 10:45 AM
> To: Bill Bartlett
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request: Anyone using bogus /
> "humorous" X-Message-Fla
am Fri, dem 05.10.2007, um 10:05:32 -0400 mailte Bill Bartlett folgendes:
> Quick request to the group: we have several members who include bogus or
> "humorous" X-Message-Flag headers in their email messages. Could I
> request that you _please_ turn them off? Because they come through as
Do yo
On 10/5/07, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2007, at 9:05 , Bill Bartlett wrote:
> * Given it's an X- header, doesn't that mean the meaning of the value
> is implementation dependent? What's "bogus" wrt Outlook may not be
> wrt another mail system or client
> * Doesn't
On Oct 5, 2007, at 9:05 , Bill Bartlett wrote:
Quick request to the group: we have several members who include
bogus or
"humorous" X-Message-Flag headers in their email messages. Could I
request that you _please_ turn them off?
In all practicality, a request like this is futile:
* Given th
Quick request to the group: we have several members who include bogus or
"humorous" X-Message-Flag headers in their email messages. Could I
request that you _please_ turn them off? Because they come through as
flagged messages in Outlook, it throws off my email rules processing
and the messages
23 matches
Mail list logo
