R: [GENERAL] Search on very big (partitioned) table

2017-02-21 Thread Job
Hi Sushant, i think the problem is that we miss check constraints. We will implement asap For the moment thank you to everybody for the excellent support! /F

Re: [GENERAL] Search on very big (partitioned) table

2017-02-20 Thread Sushant Pawar
What is the execution plan of a query is showing? Check whether it is reading through all partitions. Best Regards, *Sushant Pawar | Database Solution Consultant* *ASHNIK TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.* Skype: sush_531 | T: +91 9769559995 <%2B65%206438%203504> | www.ashnik.com On Tue, Feb 21,

Re: [GENERAL] Search on very big (partitioned) table

2017-02-20 Thread Adam Brusselback
Do you have non overlapping check constraints on the partitions by date to allow the planner to exclude the child tables from needing to be looked at?

[GENERAL] Search on very big (partitioned) table

2017-02-20 Thread Collini, ColliniConsulting.it
Hu guys, we have a test machine with Postgresql 9.6.1 an about 800.000.000 record in a table. Table is partitioned by day, with indexes on partitioned table. Also a simple query (for example i want to search log occurred in a specific day), is immediate in tha partitioned table (table_2017_02_1

Re: [GENERAL] Search for lists

2011-06-19 Thread Gavin Flower
[...] > I need to search a table to find sets of rows that have a column matching > itself for the whole set and another column matching row for row with a > list I am going to supply. The result I should receive should be value of > the column that matches itself. [...] How about: DROP TAB

Re: [GENERAL] Search for lists

2011-06-19 Thread F. BROUARD / SQLpro
Le 18/06/2011 23:51, Daron Ryan a écrit : Hello, I need to search a table to find sets of rows that have a column matching itself for the whole set and another column matching row for row with a list I am going to supply. The result I should receive should be value of the column that matches it

Re: [GENERAL] Search for lists

2011-06-18 Thread Daron Ryan
Thanks. On 19/06/2011 8:09 AM, David Johnston wrote: An alternative approach would be to select using a IN condition on the where clause and group by column 1 and column 2. Then, using this as a sub-select group by the resultant column 1 and a count on column two. The matching identifiers a

Re: [GENERAL] Search for lists

2011-06-18 Thread David Johnston
An alternative approach would be to select using a IN condition on the where clause and group by column 1 and column 2. Then, using this as a sub-select group by the resultant column 1 and a count on column two. The matching identifiers are those with a count equal to the number of entries in

Re: [GENERAL] Search for lists

2011-06-18 Thread David Johnston
Untested approach Use array_agg on column 2 along with group by on column 1 to build check arrays and then use equals to compare with an array of your desired input values. You should omit duplicates and order ascending both the data and the input to ensure you are matching canonical forms. Dav

[GENERAL] Search for lists

2011-06-18 Thread Daron Ryan
Hello, I need to search a table to find sets of rows that have a column matching itself for the whole set and another column matching row for row with a list I am going to supply. The result I should receive should be value of the column that matches itself. For example given the following

Re: [GENERAL] Search then Delete Performance

2010-09-15 Thread Michael Hull
hael Hull >> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org >> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Search then Delete Performance >> >>   On 09/14/10 5:55 PM, Michael Hull wrote: >> > So fairly simply, I have a daemon running on a machine, which >> accesses >> > this DB. Clients connect an

Re: [GENERAL] Search then Delete Performance

2010-09-14 Thread Dann Corbit
> -Original Message- > From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general- > ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 8:41 PM > To: Michael Hull > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERA

Re: [GENERAL] Search then Delete Performance

2010-09-14 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/14/10 5:55 PM, Michael Hull wrote: So fairly simply, I have a daemon running on a machine, which accesses this DB. Clients connect and request the details for say 1000 simulations, at which point the daemon takes 1000 entries from the unassigned table and moves them to the assigned table.

Re: [GENERAL] Search then Delete Performance

2010-09-14 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Hull writes: > I am fairly new to practical databases, but I am trying out the c > interface to postgres and am wondering how to improve performance. I > am a researcher, and I am trying to perform a large parameter sweep. > Since this will involve a couple of thousand simulations, I have

Re: [GENERAL] Search then Delete Performance

2010-09-14 Thread Arjen Nienhuis
Hi, It's probably slow because you run many queries where a few would work: DELETE FROM unassignedjobs WHERE jobid IN (6, 8 ,2, 99, 66) But I wouldn't know how to build a query like that in C. A script in python or even bash that dit it would be faster than your C implementation. What you can d

[GENERAL] Search then Delete Performance

2010-09-14 Thread Michael Hull
Hi Everyone, I am fairly new to practical databases, but I am trying out the c interface to postgres and am wondering how to improve performance. I am a researcher, and I am trying to perform a large parameter sweep. Since this will involve a couple of thousand simulations, I have a process that ma

Re: [GENERAL] Search system catalog for mystery type

2009-11-09 Thread Carlo Stonebanks
There are renamed tables with one leading underscore sitting on the system right now. I don't know how many mechanisms there are for renaming, as this renaming (until now) was done from a "rename" function within pgAdmin or EMS PG-SQL Manager - this is the first time I can think of having explic

Re: [GENERAL] Search system catalog for mystery type

2009-11-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Carlo Stonebanks wrote: > When I try the following command: > ALTER TABLE mdx_core.audit_impt RENAME TO _audit_impt; > > I get the error message: > > ERROR: type "_audit_impt" already exists > SQL state: 42710 Probably the easiest way around this is to use two underscores instead of one: ALTER

Re: [GENERAL] Search system catalog for mystery type

2009-11-04 Thread Tom Lane
Sam Mason writes: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:31:55AM -0500, Carlo Stonebanks wrote: >> When I try the following command: >> ALTER TABLE mdx_core.audit_impt RENAME TO _audit_impt; >> >> ERROR: type "_audit_impt" already exists You aren't going to be able to do that, because of the conflict with

Re: [GENERAL] Search system catalog for mystery type

2009-11-04 Thread Sam Mason
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:31:55AM -0500, Carlo Stonebanks wrote: > When I try the following command: > ALTER TABLE mdx_core.audit_impt RENAME TO _audit_impt; > > ERROR: type "_audit_impt" already exists > > How do I search the system catalogs to find this particular "type"? select typname, ty

[GENERAL] Search system catalog for mystery type

2009-11-04 Thread Carlo Stonebanks
When I try the following command: ALTER TABLE mdx_core.audit_impt RENAME TO _audit_impt; I get the error message: ERROR: type "_audit_impt" already exists SQL state: 42710 I have looked through tables, types, sequences etc. I even did a PLAIN schema (no data) backup on the DB and did a text se

Re: [GENERAL] Search Path vs Synonyms

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Seaborn
: Matthew Seaborn Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Search Path vs Synonyms On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:38, Matthew Seaborn wrote: > Ah, I am actually using EnterpriseDB (a commercial 'fork' of PSQL) which does > have synonyms. For support on EnterpriseDB yo

Re: [GENERAL] Search Path vs Synonyms

2009-07-24 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:38, Matthew Seaborn wrote: > Ah, I am actually using EnterpriseDB (a commercial 'fork' of PSQL) which does > have synonyms. For support on EnterpriseDB you should contact EnterpriseDB, not the PostgreSQL community. We can only answer about the opensource product. > Is

Re: [GENERAL] Search Path vs Synonyms

2009-07-24 Thread John R Pierce
Matthew Seaborn wrote: Ah, I am actually using EnterpriseDB (a commercial 'fork' of PSQL) which does have synonyms. then you likely will get more help from EnterpriseDB's technical support, as only they are really familiar with their proprietary and commercial product. -- Sent via pg

Re: [GENERAL] Search Path vs Synonyms

2009-07-24 Thread Matthew Seaborn
orn; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Search Path vs Synonyms Matthew Seaborn wrote: > Given the situation where a user connecting to the database > needs access to two separate schemas: the primary schema > which contains the data they will be updating and a second >

Re: [GENERAL] Search Path vs Synonyms

2009-07-23 Thread Albe Laurenz
Matthew Seaborn wrote: > Given the situation where a user connecting to the database > needs access to two separate schemas: the primary schema > which contains the data they will be updating and a second > schema which contains read-only reference data, used by many > users, that will be using

[GENERAL] Search Path vs Synonyms

2009-07-23 Thread Matthew Seaborn
Given the situation where a user connecting to the database needs access to two separate schemas: the primary schema which contains the data they will be updating and a second schema which contains read-only reference data, used by many users, that will be using in joins on queries. I don't wan

Re: [GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-12 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:58 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, June 11, 2009 17:37, Andy Colson wrote: > >> That's a little vague, so how about: >> >> select * from somethine where (extract(year from idate) = $1) or >> (extract(year from idate) = $2 and extract(month from idate) = $3) >> or (ex

Re: [GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-12 Thread Sam Mason
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:47:26AM +0200, Leif B. Kristensen wrote: > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION date2text(DATE) RETURNS TEXT AS $$ > -- removes hyphens from a regular date > SELECT > SUBSTR(TEXT($1),1,4) || > SUBSTR(TEXT($1),6,2) || > SUBSTR(TEXT($1),9,2) > $$ LANGUAGE sql STABLE; Why

Re: [GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-12 Thread James B. Byrne
On Thu, June 11, 2009 17:37, Andy Colson wrote: > That's a little vague, so how about: > > select * from somethine where (extract(year from idate) = $1) or > (extract(year from idate) = $2 and extract(month from idate) = $3) > or (extract(year from idate) = $4 and extract(month from idate) = $5 >

Re: [GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-11 Thread Leif B. Kristensen
On Thursday 11. June 2009, James B. Byrne wrote: >Given a datetime column, not null, is there a single syntax that >permits searching for all dates in a given year, year+month, and >year+month+day such that a single parameterised query can handle all >three circumstances? Apart from the other exce

Re: [GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-11 Thread Andy Colson
James B. Byrne wrote: Given a datetime column, not null, is there a single syntax that permits searching for all dates in a given year, year+month, and year+month+day such that a single parameterised query can handle all three circumstances? That's a little vague, so how about: select * from

Re: [GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-11 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "James B. Byrne" writes: >> Given a datetime column, not null, is there a single syntax that >> permits searching for all dates in a given year, year+month, and >> year+month+day such that a single parameterised query can handle all >> three circu

Re: [GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-11 Thread Tom Lane
"James B. Byrne" writes: > Given a datetime column, not null, is there a single syntax that > permits searching for all dates in a given year, year+month, and > year+month+day such that a single parameterised query can handle all > three circumstances? Try date_trunc() ... however, if you want th

Re: [GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-11 Thread Christophe
On Jun 11, 2009, at 1:23 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: Given a datetime column, not null, is there a single syntax that permits searching for all dates in a given year, year+month, and year+month+day such that a single parameterised query can handle all three circumstances? Well, of course, in a

[GENERAL] search for partial dates

2009-06-11 Thread James B. Byrne
Given a datetime column, not null, is there a single syntax that permits searching for all dates in a given year, year+month, and year+month+day such that a single parameterised query can handle all three circumstances? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne

Re: [GENERAL] Search for text in any function

2009-02-19 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:27:23PM -0500, Rob Richardson wrote: > Thank you very much. It works, as I'm sure you knew. > > But I have a further question. I've never seen the "~*" operator > before, and searching for it in the docs and on Google did not return > any results I could find. What do

Re: [GENERAL] Search for text in any function

2009-02-19 Thread Rob Richardson
Thank you very much. It works, as I'm sure you knew. But I have a further question. I've never seen the "~*" operator before, and searching for it in the docs and on Google did not return any results I could find. What does it mean? Thanks again! RobR -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list

Re: [GENERAL] Search for text in any function

2009-02-19 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:46:41PM -0500, Rob Richardson wrote: > Can anyone suggest a query that will tell me the names of all functions > (both trigger and normal) that contain a given string of text? assuming you mean pl/* functions, you can simply use: select proname from pg_proc where prosrc

[GENERAL] Search for text in any function

2009-02-19 Thread Rob Richardson
Greetings! Can anyone suggest a query that will tell me the names of all functions (both trigger and normal) that contain a given string of text? Here's what happened: My company's database has a table named "charge" and a view named "availcharges" that returns all charges that are available.

Re: [GENERAL] Search connections created per day

2008-01-16 Thread João Paulo Zavanela
>> Hi there, >> >> I want to know how many connections is created simultaneously in data base >> per day. > >Do you want to know the max simo connections at any given time, or the >total connections in a given day? Assuming you want to know the max >simo connections at any given time, I think you'

Re: [GENERAL] Search connections created per day

2008-01-11 Thread Erik Jones
On Jan 11, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:29:32 -0300 João Paulo Zavanela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there, I want to know how many connections is created simultaneously in data base per day. Entirely depen

Re: [GENERAL] Search connections created per day

2008-01-11 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Jan 11, 2008 11:29 AM, João Paulo Zavanela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I want to know how many connections is created simultaneously in data base > per day. Do you want to know the max simo connections at any given time, or the total connections in a given day? Assuming you want

Re: [GENERAL] Search connections created per day

2008-01-11 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:29:32 -0300 João Paulo Zavanela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I want to know how many connections is created simultaneously in data > base per day. Entirely depends on your machine. I wouldn't suggest having more

[GENERAL] Search connections created per day

2008-01-11 Thread João Paulo Zavanela
Hi there, I want to know how many connections is created simultaneously in data base per day. Are there some table where i can search it? All users is connected in the database with postgres user. Thanks. João Paulo Zavanela ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [GENERAL] Search path in group_roles not honered for logins

2007-10-31 Thread Tom Lane
Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why is this such or is this an intended feature? No, there is no intention that ALTER ROLE SET values be inherited --- what you get is just what is attached to the role you logged in as. What would you do with conflicting sets from different inherited role

Re: [GENERAL] Search path in group_roles not honered for logins

2007-10-31 Thread Ow Mun Heng
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 00:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Why is this such or is this an intended feature? > > No, there is no intention that ALTER ROLE SET values be inherited --- > what you get is just what is attached to the role you logged in as. > What

[GENERAL] Search path in group_roles not honered for logins

2007-10-31 Thread Ow Mun Heng
CREATE ROLE db_users NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE; ALTER ROLE db_users SET search_path=mydb, public; When I create a login, CREATE ROLE oli LOGIN ENCRYPTED PASSWORD 'mXXX' NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE; ALTER ROLE oliver SET search_path=xmms; < I have to set

Re: [GENERAL] General search problem - challenge

2007-07-03 Thread Richard Huxton
Postgres User wrote: I have a table of around 6,000 places in the world. Everytime my server receives a ping, I'm grabbing the content of an article from an RSS feed. Then I search the article for the presence of any the 6000 terms. A typical article is around 1200 words. I don't need to save

Re: [GENERAL] General search problem - challenge

2007-07-02 Thread Steve Atkins
On Jul 2, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Postgres User wrote: I have a table of around 6,000 places in the world. Everytime my server receives a ping, I'm grabbing the content of an article from an RSS feed. Then I search the article for the presence of any the 6000 terms. A typical article is around 1200

[GENERAL] General search problem - challenge

2007-07-02 Thread Postgres User
I have a table of around 6,000 places in the world. Everytime my server receives a ping, I'm grabbing the content of an article from an RSS feed. Then I search the article for the presence of any the 6000 terms. A typical article is around 1200 words. I don't need to save the article in a table

Re: [GENERAL] Search by distance

2006-04-11 Thread John D. Burger
Oscar Picasso wrote: I guess I also need a database of the cities coordinates. Where could I find one? You can download US data here: http://geonames.usgs.gov/domestic/download_data.htm These are tables of geo entities with a number of columns, including lat/long. NGA (formerly NIMA) has

Re: [GENERAL] Search by distance

2006-04-10 Thread Jeffrey Melloy
Oscar Picasso wrote: HI, I would like to implement a search by distance to my application. Something like (pseudo sql): select * from users where users.location is less than 15 miles from chicago. Any documentation on how to implements that? I guess I also need a database of the cities coor

[GENERAL] Search by distance

2006-04-10 Thread Oscar Picasso
HI,I would like to implement a search by distance to my application.Something like (pseudo sql):select * from userswhere users.location is less than 15 miles from chicago.Any documentation on how to implements that?I guess I also need a database of the cities coordinates. Where could I find one?Tha

Re: [GENERAL] Search for restricting foreign keys

2005-01-25 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Michael Fuhr wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:35:45PM -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote: Is there a way in PG 7.3, given a field, to find out what other tables & records are linked to it via a foreign key? The pg_constraint table contains, among other things, foreign key constraints. By querying it an

Re: [GENERAL] Search for restricting foreign keys

2005-01-24 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:35:45PM -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote: > Is there a way in PG 7.3, given a field, to find out what other tables & > records are linked to it via a foreign key? See the "System Catalogs" chapter in the documentation: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/catalogs.htm

[GENERAL] Search for restricting foreign keys

2005-01-24 Thread Benjamin Smith
Is there a way in PG 7.3, given a field, to find out what other tables & records are linked to it via a foreign key? EG: create table cities (id serial primary key, title varchar not null); insert into cities(title) values ('San Fransisco'); insert into cities(title) values ('Los Angeles');

Re: [GENERAL] Search in code

2004-07-24 Thread Tom Lane
Vitaly Belman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In Oracle I was used to be able to search directly in code from SQL > Navigator (I'm not sure if it is a feature of the database or the > tool). It means that I could search if a certain string appears in one > of the functions (across different schemas/p

[GENERAL] Search in code

2004-07-24 Thread Vitaly Belman
In Oracle I was used to be able to search directly in code from SQL Navigator (I'm not sure if it is a feature of the database or the tool). It means that I could search if a certain string appears in one of the functions (across different schemas/packages). Is there some way to accomplish this in

Re: [GENERAL] Search across multiple sources

2004-02-02 Thread Bernd Helmle
Merrall, Graeme wrote: I don't think there's an easy way to do this but I thought I better ask just in case. I'm trying to come up with a way to search across a number of databases without resorting to lots of horrible scripts. In one database I have a lot of news stories from our news provider wh

Re: [GENERAL] Search across multiple sources

2004-02-01 Thread Merrall, Graeme
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Merrall, Graeme wrote: > > > > > I don't think there's an easy way to do this but I thought > I better ask just in case. I'm trying to come up with a way > to search across a number of databases without resorting to > lots of horrible scripts. In one database I have a lo

Re: [GENERAL] Search across multiple sources

2004-02-01 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Why not use schema and single search table contains indices from different schemes (use trigger to update search table) On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Merrall, Graeme wrote: > > I don't think there's an easy way to do this but I thought I better ask just in > case. I'm trying to come up with a way to sear

[GENERAL] Search across multiple sources

2004-01-31 Thread Merrall, Graeme
I don't think there's an easy way to do this but I thought I better ask just in case. I'm trying to come up with a way to search across a number of databases without resorting to lots of horrible scripts. In one database I have a lot of news stories from our news provider while in another data

Re: [GENERAL] Search engine doesn't work

2001-01-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to try in the archives how to store a md5sum best in a database > (origin is 16 bytes binary, if I don't get a good answer I will use ASCII > like the output of the md5sum UNIX command since this is easy to debug). > > I got this error:

[GENERAL] Search engine doesn't work

2001-01-27 Thread Marc SCHAEFER
Hi, I wanted to try in the archives how to store a md5sum best in a database (origin is 16 bytes binary, if I don't get a good answer I will use ASCII like the output of the md5sum UNIX command since this is easy to debug). I got this error: Not Found The requested URL /mhonarc/pgsql-general/se

[GENERAL] Search engine on http://www.postgresql.org ...

2000-11-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
After cursing over this for I don't know how long, its was recently brought to my attention that the C search.cgi that comes with UDMsearch just might not be up to snuff, compared to some of the other interfaces ... After some investigation, we've installed a mod_perl front-end to the database t

[GENERAL] Search inherited tables

2000-09-09 Thread Stephan Richter
Hello everyone, I have he following situation: I have a 'base' table called Problem and 5 other tables that inherit Problem: MultipleChoiceProblem, TrueFalseProblem, EssayProblem, NumericProblem and MatchProblem I want to do the following query: SELECT * FROM Problem; But Problem is empty,

[GENERAL] Search (select) options

2000-08-15 Thread Jeff Davis
I would like to be able to use searches that seem somewhat intelligent. Can you 'ORDER BY' number of matching 'OR' clauses? For example, someone searches for "x y z", so I would do "select * from mytable where col1 like '%x%' or col1 like '%y%' or col1 like '%z%';", but I want it to order by numbe

[GENERAL] Search engine down ?

2000-07-02 Thread Gilles DAROLD
Hi, I want to find information into your search engine for postgresql mailing list but I can't find any answer to my search. Typing SELECT or CURSOR or any other words in pgsql-general or pgsql-sql give me no output. Perhaps you have an indexation problem ? Regards

Re: [GENERAL] Search

1999-08-01 Thread Herouth Maoz
At 03:43 +0300 on 01/08/1999, Gilles Darold wrote: > I don't know about windows-1251. Perhaps this can't help you. But if > you have japanese in you database, you can proceed a search on it so > why not windows-1251 ? Because the backend has to know that the lowercase for char NNN in this codep

Re: [GENERAL] Search

1999-07-31 Thread Gilles Darold
Hi, For case insensitive you must use the regexp search as follow : SELECT title, firstname, lastname, description FROM stuff WHERE title *~ '.*.*' AND firtsname *~ '.*.*'; > > P.S.: as far as I know there is no locale for windows-1251 and, > unfortunately, I can't store data in koi8-r w

[GENERAL] Search

1999-07-31 Thread Dmitry Popov
Greetings, I store text data in windows-1251 encoding in my pgSQL database and when I execute SQL command like SELECT title, firstname, lastname, description FROM stuff WHERE title LIKE '%%' AND firtsname LIKE '%%' AND lastname LIKE '%%' AND description LIKE '%%' the response comes reall

Re: [GENERAL] Search engine with PostgreSQL

1999-04-28 Thread valter
Wim Ceulemans wrote: > Hi > > Has anyone any experience whether it is possible to build with a PostgreSQl > database and a linux box a search engine for a portal? > i'm doing this. It's name will be GOLIATH > > Regards > > Wim Ceulemans - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nice Software Solutions - http://ww