Adrian Klaver wrote:
Thanks Adrian, noted. I'm hoping to get onto 8.4 before too long because
of the analytic functions but that thread suggests that the best course
of action would be to make sure that my code is robust against the new
server and then decide on an upgrade schedule.
I'm building
On Friday 25 December 2009 10:27:09 am Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Adrian Klaver wrote:
> >> although I don't know why it didn't bite on 8.2 unless it's specifically
> >> when 64-bit timestamps are processed.
> >
> > You might want to confirm your 8.4 installation is using integer
> > datetimes as t
Adrian Klaver wrote:
although I don't know why it didn't bite on 8.2 unless it's specifically
when 64-bit timestamps are processed.
You might want to confirm your 8.4 installation is using integer datetimes as
there is some variability in its useage among packagers. Follow this thread for
one
On Friday 25 December 2009 5:06:28 am Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 December 2009 11:20:35 am Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> >> I was hoping to finally get the servers updated from 8.2 to 8.4 over the
> >> festive season, but by now I think I've left things too tigh
Adrian Klaver wrote:
On Thursday 24 December 2009 11:20:35 am Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I was hoping to finally get the servers updated from 8.2 to 8.4 over the
festive season, but by now I think I've left things too tight.
Is it necessary to update the (Windows) ODBC driver as well? I've got a
On Thursday 24 December 2009 11:20:35 am Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I was hoping to finally get the servers updated from 8.2 to 8.4 over the
> festive season, but by now I think I've left things too tight.
>
> Is it necessary to update the (Windows) ODBC driver as well? I've got a
> couple of app s
I was hoping to finally get the servers updated from 8.2 to 8.4 over the
festive season, but by now I think I've left things too tight.
Is it necessary to update the (Windows) ODBC driver as well? I've got a
couple of app servers still on NT4 with ODBC 8.02.0100 which I'm trying
to be careful
