Hello all,
maybe some general advice can be had on this:
table test_results
modified_by integer foreign key staff(pk),
intended_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk),
actual_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk)
(this table will contain millions of rows)
table staff
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Hello all,
maybe some general advice can be had on this:
table test_results
modified_by integer foreign key staff(pk),
intended_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk),
actual_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk)
(this table will contain
typo sorry
justin wrote:
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Hello all,
maybe some general advice can be had on this:
table test_results
modified_by integer foreign key staff(pk),
intended_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk),
actual_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk)
(this table will
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:12:05PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Hello all,
maybe some general advice can be had on this:
table test_results
modified_by integer foreign key staff(pk),
intended_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk),
actual_reviewer integer foreign key
On Jan 27, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Hello all,
maybe some general advice can be had on this:
table test_results
modified_by integer foreign key staff(pk),
intended_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk),
actual_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk)
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 06:48:11PM +, Sam Mason wrote:
table test_results
modified_by integer foreign key staff(pk),
intended_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk),
actual_reviewer integer foreign key staff(pk)
(this table will contain millions of rows)
table
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
The view in question is in fact a lot more complicated. This
is the best I've been able to come up with so far (and it is
still slow - slow as in 3-4 seconds for 20 records out of
(currently only) 50 !):
What does EXPLAIN ANALYZE say about it?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:42:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
The view in question is in fact a lot more complicated. This
is the best I've been able to come up with so far (and it is
still slow - slow as in 3-4 seconds for 20 records out of
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:42:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
What does EXPLAIN ANALYZE say about it? Also, what is the use-case
you are concerned about --- selecting the whole view contents, or
selecting WHERE something-or-other?
Oh, and the use case is to select all the test_results which
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
the explain analyze of which is (I've actually gotten it to
work better in the meantime as you can see):
Looks like most of the problem is in the subquery scans on v_staff,
which seems to be a rather expensive view :-(. Maybe you can
simplify
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 05:30:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
the explain analyze of which is (I've actually gotten it to
work better in the meantime as you can see):
Looks like most of the problem is in the subquery scans on v_staff,
which
11 matches
Mail list logo
