On 2/24/07, Tomi N/A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's the kind of leverage I'd like to have when talking about using
pgsql with my colleagues.
Anyone care to comment?
The name brand test are basically paid pr for the big databases.
Basically, the tests are in environments controlled completel
2007/2/25, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If the objective is to claim a world record, we'd look pretty silly
trying to do so with a nonstandard, non-certified test. The point
of certification in this context is that you have someone else
attesting to the validity of your results. Without that,
"Tomi N/A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2007/2/24, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> You can not publish TPC tests without a TPC fee :). However there are
>> plenty of other tests such as dbt2 and odbcbench that can give you
>> comparable and free results.
> I mentioned a TPC test as an exa
2007/2/24, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/24/07 11:00, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Tomi N/A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL. I pose the question
>>
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/24/07 11:00, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Tomi N/A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL. I pose the question
from an advocacy standpoint: why doesn't postgr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/07 11:00, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tomi N/A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
>> clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL. I pose the question
>> from an advocacy standpoint:
"Tomi N/A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
> clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL. I pose the question
> from an advocacy standpoint: why doesn't postgresql hold a world
> record of some sort (except performance/price)?
Tomi N/A wrote:
> I just ran into an article about Oracle setting a world record in some
> kind of test:
> http://www.oracle.com/corporate/press/2007_feb/TPC-H_300GB_Benchmark_wHP.html?rssid=rss_ocom_pr
>
>
> ...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
> clients and use
I just ran into an article about Oracle setting a world record in some
kind of test:
http://www.oracle.com/corporate/press/2007_feb/TPC-H_300GB_Benchmark_wHP.html?rssid=rss_ocom_pr
...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQ
