On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Berkus doesn't count??! He's got long hair! What more do you want?!
Well, then based on volume he should count as two :-)
No offense intended, Josh... *I'd* count as two, too.
Nah, Josh ain't
Ron Johnson wrote:
It's a pack/herd mentality that serves the species very well, most
of the time.
Odd that you should state that, in light of your signature tag line.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is common sense really valid?
For example, it is common sense to white-power
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:10 -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
Merlin Moncure wrote:
I have seen a steady progressive rise in the number of postgresql
related jobs and the quality of those jobs. Major companies are
apparently rolling out critical infrastructure on postgresql...Vonage
is one
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:48:47AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 08:47, Brad Nicholson wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:38 -0500, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
For a high level corp manager all they ever hear
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:30:59PM -0700, CSN wrote:
PostgreSQL doesn't have any booth babes? ;P
Berkus doesn't count??! He's got long hair! What more do you want?!
:P
csn
On 09/20/06 16:38, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
[snip]
I think that description is false. At a certain point in the
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:14:06AM +0200, Andrew Kelly wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:10 -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
Merlin Moncure wrote:
I have seen a steady progressive rise in the number of postgresql
related jobs and the quality of those jobs. Major companies are
apparently
Berkus doesn't count??! He's got long hair! What more do you want?!
banjos playing in background...
--
Scott Ribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the
On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
In contrast, if a similar infringement were found with one of the
products of, say, IBM, you might discover that you got some value for
money out of those licensing fees in that the only folks sued are
likely to be IBM...
That assumes
On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Berkus doesn't count??! He's got long hair! What more do you want?!
Well, then based on volume he should count as two :-)
No offense intended, Josh... *I'd* count as two, too.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Alvaro,I wonder if we could replace the elephant logo with a female elephant logo.That could work wonders ... among the elephant community at least.Are there many elephants among decision makers?
Asking
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:38 -0500, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
For a high level corp manager all they ever hear about is MS SQL Server,
Oracle and DB2, and the more it costs the more they think it is what
they need :-)
I think
In response to Brad Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:38 -0500, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
For a high level corp manager all they ever hear about is MS SQL Server,
Oracle and DB2, and the more it costs the
Bill,Suing someone is not the real reason.It's the excuse given to one'sboss.The real reason is the Nobody ever got fired for using IBM
mentality. Nobody ever got fired for using IBM - today it is translated to (Oracle|Microsoft)And it may still be true. But it gives you only half the story: IF
they need :-)
I think that description is false. At a certain point in the
management hierarchy, the only way anyone has the ability to evaluate
something is on the basis of reputation.
I think that description is false. At a certain point in the management
hierarchy, the only way anyone has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/06 09:28, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Brad Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:38 -0500, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto
wrote:
[snip]
Suing someone is not the real
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 08:47, Brad Nicholson wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:38 -0500, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
For a high level corp manager all they ever hear about is MS SQL Server,
Oracle and DB2, and the more it costs the
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:38 -0500, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
For a high level corp manager all they ever hear about is MS SQL Server,
Oracle and DB2, and the more it costs the more they think it is what
they need :-)
I think that
After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brad Nicholson)
belched out:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:38 -0500, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
For a high level corp manager all they ever hear about is MS SQL Server,
Oracle
On Sep 19, 2006, at 23:57 , Merlin Moncure wrote:
I have seen a steady progressive rise in the number of postgresql
related jobs and the quality of those jobs. Major companies are
apparently rolling out critical infrastructure on postgresql...Vonage
is one example:
Merlin Moncure wrote:
I have seen a steady progressive rise in the number of postgresql
related jobs and the quality of those jobs. Major companies are
apparently rolling out critical infrastructure on postgresql...Vonage
is one example:
That is good news, I wish there where some of those
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:05:00AM -0400, AgentM wrote:
On Sep 19, 2006, at 23:57 , Merlin Moncure wrote:
I have seen a steady progressive rise in the number of postgresql
related jobs and the quality of those jobs. Major companies are
apparently rolling out critical infrastructure on
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
For a high level corp manager all they ever hear about is MS SQL Server,
Oracle and DB2, and the more it costs the more they think it is what
they need :-)
I think that description is false. At a certain point in the
management
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
For a high level corp manager all they ever hear about is MS SQL Server,
Oracle and DB2, and the more it costs the more they think it is what
they need :-)
I think that description is false. At a certain point in the
management
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/20/06 16:38, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
[snip]
I think that description is false. At a certain point in the
management hierarchy, the only way anyone has the ability to
evaluate something is on the basis of
- if there is someone they can
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/20/06 16:38, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
[snip]
I think that description is false. At a certain point in the
management hierarchy, the only way anyone has the ability to
evaluate something is on the basis of
- if there is someone they can sue.
- how
PostgreSQL doesn't have any booth babes? ;P
csn
On 09/20/06 16:38, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
[snip]
I think that description is false. At a certain point in the
management hierarchy, the only way anyone has the ability to
evaluate something is on the basis of
- if there is
On 9/21/06, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if we could replace the elephant logo with a female elephant
logo. That could work wonders ... among the elephant community at
least. Are there many elephants among decision makers?
our elephant isn't female? that changes
On 21/9/2006 9:39, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if we could replace the elephant logo with a female elephant
logo. That could work wonders ... among the elephant community at
least. Are there many elephants among decision makers?
Aren't they all elephants?
Oh hang on
I have seen a steady progressive rise in the number of postgresql
related jobs and the quality of those jobs. Major companies are
apparently rolling out critical infrastructure on postgresql...Vonage
is one example:
29 matches
Mail list logo
