On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:38:17PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Look into Debian unstable, or if you are partial to Red Hat-derived
> > stuff look into Fedora.
>
> I have and if it is there I can't find it.
Where are you looking?
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/postgresql-7.4
htt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> ...Should I expect
>>> any problems with this even on the old 2.4 kernel?
>>
>> I'd advise you to be using a 2.6 kernel at this point, too.
>>
> ... I assume 8 will still work on 2.4 though.
IIRC, you need a reasonably modern 2.6 kernel (early 2005)
if you want fsync(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2)Is there a reliable way to install 8.1x on debian and centos using
> apt and yum?
For Debian, take a look at backports.org.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: H
Thanks for the reply.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> 1)Do I run these old versions on my linux servers and the new version
>> 8.1x
>> for development? If I do this will I have to constantly battle
>> compatibility issues when going from development to the production
>> servers? Will it be a big
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 04:23:10PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd advise you to be using a 2.6 kernel at this point, too. I don't
> know what the Centos guys have in mind as a schedule for releasing
> a 2.6-based distro, but again Fedora is at least as good a bet if you
> want a Red Hat based distro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 1)Do I run these old versions on my linux servers and the new version 8.1x
> for development? If I do this will I have to constantly battle
> compatibility issues when going from development to the production
> servers? Will it be a big headache? Will I be missing out
I use to use postgres quite a bit but have been working on a project for a
couple years that does not use it. I have finally convinced them to make
the switch after our current database hsqldb couldn't keep up with the
task.
So, for this project I will need postgres working on a debian server
(2.
