Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
> On 29/05/2008, Bob Pawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ... get their point across up front without making me wade through
> > previous posts which I have already read.
> Good for you :}
>
> > I can understand the concept of bottom posting
> No one advocates bottom-
On 29/05/2008, Bob Pawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... get their point across up front without making me wade through
> previous posts which I have already read.
Good for you :}
> I can understand the concept of bottom posting
No one advocates bottom-posting here. It's all about intersparsed
k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Andy Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Postgres General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Bottom Posting
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL P
"Bob Pawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The concept of most lists should be "the free exchange of ideas in the most
> efficient manner possible".
What is this in response to?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA servic
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bottom line: have some respect for your readers. Make it easy to
> distinguish what you wrote from the preceding material, and remember
> that the only reason you are quoting anything at all is to provide some
> context for what you are saying. We don't
Andy Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On May 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Gregory Williamson wrote:
>> In-line comments are more readable, especially for longish emails.
> But if you do bottom-post, please *do* edit the earlier content down
> to just the context of your comments. Otherwise rea
> > What do you mean whan you say "Don't top post???
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
On May 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Gregory Williamson wrote:
In-line comments are more readable, especially for longish emails.
The PosgreSQL mail lists all prefer this method. Some related lists
(t
