>
> Something which would be good to have for all those queries is a set of
> isolation tests. No need for multiple specs, you could just use one
> spec with one session defining all the object types you would like to
> work on. How did you find this object list? Did you test all the
> objects a
On 05/09/2018 02:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> My current proposal is thus to do add a check that does
> #if defined(__clang__) && defined(__i386__) && !defined(__SSE2_MATH__)
> something-that-fails
> #endif
> in an autoconf test, and have configure complain if that
> fails. Something roughly along th
At Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:05:55 +0300, Alexander Korotkov
wrote in
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:16 PM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> wrote:
> > I agree that fillfactor should be ignored in certain cases
> > (inserting the first tuple into empty pages or something like
> > that). Even though GiST doesn't need
> 5 сент. 2018 г., в 13:29, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> написал(а):
>
> We don't preserve it for Andrey's use case.
Just my 2 cents: that was a hacky use case for development reasons. I think
that removing fillfactor is good idea and your latest patch looks good from my
POV.
Best regards, Andrey B
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:45 AM R, Siva wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 09:16 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > Do you have a test scenario for reproduction of this issue? We need
> > it to ensure that fix is correct.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have a way of reproducing this issue.
> So far I
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:22 AM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
>>
>> The current version of patch doesn't really distinguish spaces and
>> delimiters in format string in non-FX mode. So, spaces and delimiters
>> are forming single group. F
Hi,
I have a bug in Windows 7 with max_files_per_process> 1200.
Using dup (0) in the function count_usable_fds more than 1200 times (0
= stdin) causes further unpredictable errors with file operations.
When I open a real file and use its descriptor for the dup, no error
occurs. In the patch
Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-04
> I was reminded about that by recent news
> about an upcoming glibc/CLDR resync that is likely to affect
> PostgreSQL users (though, I guess, probably only when they do a major
> OS upgrade).
Or replicating/restoring a database to a newer host.
> ... or, on a Debian
(2018/08/30 21:58), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
(2018/08/30 20:37), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
At Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:45:35 +0900, Etsuro
Fujita wrote
in<5b7ffdef.6020...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
(2018/08/21 11:01), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
At Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:49:02 +0900, Etsuro
Fujita wrote
in<5b72c1ae.8010
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:26 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:45 AM R, Siva wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 09:16 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> > > Do you have a test scenario for reproduction of this issue? We need
> > > it to ensure that fix is correct.
> >
> >
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:05 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:22 AM David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The current version of patch doesn't really distinguish spaces and
> >> delimiters in format string
Hi,
I prepared next version of Background worker (cleaner) based on a retail
indextuple deletion patch.
This version shows stable behavior on regression tests and pgbench
workloads.
In this version:
1. Only AccessShareLock are acquired on a cleanup of heap and index
relations.
2. Some 'aggre
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:10 PM amul sul wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:05 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:22 AM David G. Johnston
> > wrote:
> > > From those results the question is how important is it to force the
> > > following breakage on our users (i.e., intr
On 2018-Sep-05, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/09/05 1:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Proposed patch. Checking isnull in a elog(ERROR) is important, because
> > the column is not marked NOT NULL. This is not true for other columns
> > where we simply do Assert(!isnull).
>
> Looks good. Thanks fo
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 05/09/2018 02:51, Andres Freund wrote:
>> My current proposal is thus to do add a check that does
>> #if defined(__clang__) && defined(__i386__) && !defined(__SSE2_MATH__)
>> something-that-fails
>> #endif
>> in an autoconf test, and have configure complain if that fa
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:39 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:26 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:45 AM R, Siva wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 09:16 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> > > wrote:
> > > > Do you have a test scenario for reproduction o
On 2018-Sep-04, Michael Paquier wrote:
> OK. I have dug into that, and finished with the attached. What do you
> think? One thing is that the definition of submake is moving out of
> REGRESS, and .PHONY gets defined.
Should this be used in src/test/modules/{brin,test_commit_ts} also?
Why do y
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:35 AM Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-04
>
> > I was reminded about that by recent news
> > about an upcoming glibc/CLDR resync that is likely to affect
> > PostgreSQL users (though, I guess, probably only when they do a major
> > OS upgrade).
>
> Or rep
Hi all;
For the last few months we have been facing a funny problem on a slave
where queries go to 100% cpu usage and never finish, causing the recovery
process to hang and the replica to fall behind, Over time we ruled out a
lot of causes and were banging our heads against this one. Today we go
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:23 AM Chris Travers wrote:
> 1. The query is in a parallel index scan or similar
> 2. A process is executing a parallel plan and allocating a significant chunk
> of memory (2MB for example) in dynamic shared memory.
> 3. The startup process goes into a loop where it se
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2018-Sep-03, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do not think we can change the names of the output arguments;
>> it'd break existing queries. However, renaming input arguments
>> shouldn't affect anything. So I propose we make pg_get_object_address'
>> input arguments be named type
On 2018-Sep-05, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > That said, I haven't heard of anyone using these functions in code yet,
> > so if we change it in 11 or 12 nobody is going to complain.
>
> ... and that's pretty much my feeling. It seems really unlikely that
> anyone's using named-a
Hi,
On 2018-09-05 01:05:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On September 4, 2018 9:11:25 PM PDT, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think that line of thought leads to an enormous increase in locking
> >> overhead, for which we'd get little if any gain in usability. So my
> >> inclination
Hi,
On 2018-09-05 13:06:06 +0300, Victor Spirin wrote:
> I have a bug in Windows 7 with max_files_per_process> 1200.
>
> Using dup (0) in the function count_usable_fds more than 1200 times (0 =
> stdin) causes further unpredictable errors with file operations.
Could you expand a bit on this?
G
On 29/08/2018 11:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have found some dying code in PL/Python.
>
> The simple slicing API (sq_slice, sq_ass_slice) has been deprecated
> since Python 2.0 and has been removed altogether in Python 3, so we can
> remove those functions from the PLyResult class. Instead, t
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018, 6:35 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:10 PM amul sul wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:05 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:22 AM David G. Johnston
> > > wrote:
> > > > From those results the question is how important
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:20 AM Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:35 AM Christoph Berg wrote:
> > int main (void) { puts (gnu_get_libc_version ()); return 0; }
> >
> > $ ./a.out
> > 2.27
>
> Hmm. I was looking for locale data version, not libc.so itself. I
> realise they come ultima
Yep, Maybe we should check for signals there.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:27 PM Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:23 AM Chris Travers
> wrote:
> > 1. The query is in a parallel index scan or similar
> > 2. A process is executing a parallel plan and allocating a significant
> chunk
Hi,
On 2018-09-05 10:05:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > On 05/09/2018 02:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> My current proposal is thus to do add a check that does
> >> #if defined(__clang__) && defined(__i386__) && !defined(__SSE2_MATH__)
> >> something-that-fails
> >> #endif
On 01/09/2018 06:33, Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan GCS Delivery) wrote:
> Certainly the PQconndefaults function specifies Debug flag for the "options"
> option.
> I think that eliminating the Debug flag is the simplest solution.
> For attached patches, GUC can be specified with the following synta
Will submit a patch here shortly. Thanks! Should we do for master and
10? Or 9.6 too?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:40 PM Chris Travers
wrote:
> Yep, Maybe we should check for signals there.
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:27 PM Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:23 AM Chris Traver
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:49 AM Chris Travers wrote:
>
> Will submit a patch here shortly. Thanks! Should we do for master and 10?
> Or 9.6 too?
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:40 PM Chris Travers wrote:
>>
>> Yep, Maybe we should check for signals there.
Yeah, it seems reasonable to check for
On 05/09/2018 18:42, Andres Freund wrote:
> Realistically we're going to be running into old versions of clang for a
> long time. And the importance of running i386 without SSE2 surely isn't
> increasing. So I don't really see an urgent need to do anything about
> it. And if it gets fixed, and we
Hi,
On 2018-09-05 18:48:44 +0200, Chris Travers wrote:
> Will submit a patch here shortly. Thanks! Should we do for master and
> 10? Or 9.6 too?
Please don't top-post on this list. This needs to be done in all
branches where the posix_fallocate call is present.
> > Yep, Maybe we should chec
On 2018-09-05 18:55:34 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 05/09/2018 18:42, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Realistically we're going to be running into old versions of clang for a
> > long time. And the importance of running i386 without SSE2 surely isn't
> > increasing. So I don't really see an urgen
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2018-09-05 18:55:34 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Another option perhaps is to let this be and accept it as alternative
>> floating point behavior. We already have some of those.
> -many. We'd directly violate our own error rules.
I think that just from a regress
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:55 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-09-05 18:48:44 +0200, Chris Travers wrote:
> > Will submit a patch here shortly. Thanks! Should we do for master and
> > 10? Or 9.6 too?
>
> Please don't top-post on this list. This needs to be done in all
> branches where
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:59 AM, R, Siva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently encountered an issue where the opaque data flags on a gin data
> leaf page was corrupted while replaying a gin insert WAL record. Upon
> further examination of the redo code, we found a bug in ginRedoRecompress
> code, which extr
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:39:50AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Should this be used in src/test/modules/{brin,test_commit_ts} also?
Hmm, I have not thought those two ones. commit_ts relies on REGRESS to
be defined so as it does its cleanup. brin is more interesting, it
directly quotes that it
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:39:50AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Should this be used in src/test/modules/{brin,test_commit_ts} also?
> Hmm, I have not thought those two ones. commit_ts relies on REGRESS to
> be defined so as it does its cleanup. brin is more interest
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:13 AM Chris Travers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:55 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:40 PM Chris Travers
>> > wrote:
>> > >> Do you mean this loop in dsm_impl_posix_resize() is getting
>> > >> interrupted constantly and never completing?
>> > >
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2018-09-05 10:05:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> One thought is that maybe we should provide a way to override this,
>> in case somebody really can't or doesn't want to use -msse2, and
>> is willing to put up with platform-dependent float behavior.
> IDK, people that are c
On 2018-09-05 14:08:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2018-09-05 10:05:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> One thought is that maybe we should provide a way to override this,
> >> in case somebody really can't or doesn't want to use -msse2, and
> >> is willing to put up with plat
On 2018-Sep-05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:39:50AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Should this be used in src/test/modules/{brin,test_commit_ts} also?
>
> Hmm, I have not thought those two ones. commit_ts relies on REGRESS to
> be defined so as it does its cleanup. bri
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 12:16:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Kapila writes:
>> Does anybody else have any idea on how can we write a test for
>> non-default block size or if we already have anything similar?
>
> Build with a non-default BLCKSZ and see if the regression tests pass.
> There's n
Hi,
On 2018-08-25 21:34:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Now you can say that'd be solved by bumping the cost up, sure. But
> > obviously the row / cost model is pretty much out of whack here, I don't
> > see how we can make reasonable decis
Hi,
On 07/26/2018 10:04 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
Done. Rebased.
This needs a rebase again.
Once resolved the patch passes make check-world, and a strace analysis
shows the associated read()/write() have been turned into
pread64()/pwrite64(). All lseek()'s are SEEK_END's.
Best regards,
J
Hi,
On 2018-08-22 06:20:21 +, Noah Misch wrote:
> I see jit slows the regression tests considerably:
Is this with LLVM assertions enabled or not? The differences seem
bigger than what I'm observing, especially on the mips animal - which I
observe uses a separately installed LLVM build.
On m
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
Tom> If you wanted to argue that the set of people who still want to
Tom> run PG on pre-SSE2 hardware is the empty set, that'd be an easier
Tom> sell really.
At the very minimum, I believe FreeBSD project policy would require that
the i386 packages for postgres
> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 05/09/2018 18:42, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Realistically we're going to be running into old versions of clang
>> for a long time. And the importance of running i386 without SSE2
>> surely isn't increasing. So I don't really see an urgent need to d
Andrew Gierth writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
> Tom> If you wanted to argue that the set of people who still want to
> Tom> run PG on pre-SSE2 hardware is the empty set, that'd be an easier
> Tom> sell really.
> At the very minimum, I believe FreeBSD project policy would require that
> th
Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-05
> > Hopefully that version info is fine-grained enough.
>
> Hmm. I was looking for locale data version, not libc.so itself. I
> realise they come ultimately from the same source package, but are the
> locale definitions and libc6 guaranteed to be updated at the same
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
>> At the very minimum, I believe FreeBSD project policy would require
>> that the i386 packages for postgresql be built to run without SSE2.
Tom> Well, can we tell them they have to use gcc to compile, or will
Tom> that be against their policy too?
That's no
Andrew Gierth writes:
> The problem is that if we're relying on -fexcess-precision=standard
> semantics in places besides infinity checks, then we won't get those
> semantics on clang/i386/no-sse2 since it has no comparable option. (What
> are we doing about compilers for x86-32 other than clang a
In particular:
exec_bind_message()
PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
Suppressing this I've achieved over 1.9 M TXN's a second on select only pgbench
on a 48 core box. It is about 50% faster with this change. The cpu usage of
GetSnapshotData drops from about 22% to 4.5%
Daniel Wood writes:
> In particular:
> exec_bind_message()
> PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
> If there were no input functions, that needed this, nor reparsing or
> reanalyzing needed, and we knew this up front, it'd be a huge win.
Unfortunately, that's not the case, s
I wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
>> One concern I have with your approach is that it isn't particularly
>> bullet-proof for cases where the rebuild is triggered by something that
>> doesn't hold a conflicting lock.
> Wouldn't that be a bug in the something-else?
So where are we on this? Should
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:20:03PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Sep-05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > It would be better to start a new thread rather than posting
> > a new patch, but I'd rather take the temperature first.
>
> Slightly feverish, it appears.
As far as I can see, the proposa
Hi,
On 2018-09-05 12:31:04 -0700, Daniel Wood wrote:
> NOTE:
>
> In GetSnapshotData because pgxact, is declared volatile, the compiler will
> not reduce the following two IF tests into a single test:
>
>
> if (pgxact->vacuumFlags & PROC_IN_LOGICAL_DECODING)
> continue;
>
>
>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:05 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:39 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:26 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:45 AM R, Siva wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 09:16 PM, Alexander Korotkov
I encountered this in 9.5 and haven't yet written a reproducer
for 10 or 11, but the code in question looks the same in master.
In xml.c, query_to_xml_internal() contains a loop that refers
to SPI_processed every iteration:
for (i = 0; i < SPI_processed; i++)
SPI_sql_row_to_xmlelement(i, res
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:10 PM Christoph Berg wrote:
> > So, it's not ideal but perhaps worth considering on the grounds that
> > it's better than nothing?
>
> Ack.
Ok, here's a little patch like that.
postgres=# select collname, collcollate, collversion from pg_collation
where collname = 'en_N
When max_files_per_process=1201 or more server not start. I tested and
debugged this on Windows 7. On Windows 10 work all right.
I found this take place after call function count_usable_fds(int
max_to_probe, int *usable_fds, int *already_open)
Error occured on the first call selres = select(
Chapman Flack writes:
> In xml.c, query_to_xml_internal() contains a loop that refers
> to SPI_processed every iteration:
> for (i = 0; i < SPI_processed; i++)
> SPI_sql_row_to_xmlelement(i, result, tablename, nulls,
> tableforest, targetns, top_level);
> likewise
> > exec_bind_message()
> > PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
>
> > If there were no input functions, that needed this, nor reparsing or
> > reanalyzing needed, and we knew this up front, it'd be a huge win.
>
> Unfortunately, that's not the case, so I think trying to get
[ redirecting to pgsql-hackers ]
I wrote:
> Gunnlaugur Thor Briem writes:
>> SET search_path = "$user"; SELECT public.unaccent('foo');
>> SET
>> ERROR: text search dictionary "unaccent" does not exist
> Meh. I think we need the attached, or something just about like it.
>
> It's barely possibl
On 09/05/18 18:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> * Replace SPI_tuptable et al with macros that access fields in the
> current SPI stack level (similar to the way that, eg, errno works
> on most modern platforms). This seems do-able, if a bit grotty.
It would mean they'd have to *be* in the stack frame, wher
Daniel Wood writes:
>>> exec_bind_message()
>>> PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
>>>
>>> If there were no input functions, that needed this, nor reparsing or
>>> reanalyzing needed, and we knew this up front, it'd be a huge win.
>> Unfortunately, that's not the case, so I think tr
On 2018-09-05 18:45:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Wood writes:
> >>> exec_bind_message()
> >>> PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
> >>>
> >>> If there were no input functions, that needed this, nor reparsing or
> >>> reanalyzing needed, and we knew this up front, it'd be a huge
Chapman Flack writes:
> On 09/05/18 18:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>> * Replace SPI_tuptable et al with macros that access fields in the
>> current SPI stack level (similar to the way that, eg, errno works
>> on most modern platforms). This seems do-able, if a bit grotty.
> It would mean they'd have to
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2018-09-05 18:45:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The snapshot has little to do with the query plan, usually. It's about
>> what view of the database the executed query will see, and particularly
>> about what view the parameter input functions will see, if they look.
> Th
> > Queries stop getting re-optimized after 5 times, unless better plans are to
> > be had. In the absence of schema changes or changing search path why is
> > the snapshot needed?
>
> The snapshot has little to do with the query plan, usually. It's about
> what view of the database the execut
On 2018-09-05 19:11:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2018-09-05 18:45:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The snapshot has little to do with the query plan, usually. It's about
> >> what view of the database the executed query will see, and particularly
> >> about what view the
-Original Message-
From: Yotsunaga, Naoki [mailto:yotsunaga.na...@jp.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 10:18 AM
To: Postgres hackers
Subject: automatic restore point
>Hi, I attached a patch to output the LSN before execution to the server log
>>when executing a specific command
Hi all,
On a recent thread of pgsql-committers has been discussed the fact that
we lacked a bit of infrastructure to allow extensions to control
isolation and TAP tests:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180905174527.ga2...@paquier.xyz
Attached is a patch which is the result of the previous
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> As far as I can see, the proposal is not cold to death and could have a
> future, so I'll begin a new thread with a more complete patch.
Done. Let's move the discussion here then:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/201809060148
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:55:39AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-08-22 06:20:21 +, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I see jit slows the regression tests considerably:
>
> Is this with LLVM assertions enabled or not?
Without, I think. I configured them like this:
cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_INSTALL_P
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/09/18 09:34, Richard Guo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we know, current planner will generate additional restriction clauses
>> from
>> equivalence clauses. This will generally lower the total cost because
>> some of
>> tuples may be fi
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Richard Guo writes:
> > In this patch, we are trying to do the similar deduction, from
> > non-equivalence
> > clauses, that is, A=B AND f(A) implies A=B AND f(A) and f(B), under some
> > restrictions on f.
>
> Uh, *what* restrictions on f()
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:45:49PM +, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> Allow extensions to install built as well as unbuilt headers.
>
> Commit df163230b overlooked the case that an out-of-tree extension
> might need to build its header files (e.g. via ./configure). If it is
> also doing a V
> "Michael" == Michael Paquier writes:
Michael> prairiedog is unhappy with this commit:
What version of GNU Make is on there, do you know? Tom? I don't see it
mentioned in the output anywhere.
--
Andrew.
Hello.
At Wed, 05 Sep 2018 20:02:04 +0900, Etsuro Fujita
wrote in <5b8fb7ac.5020...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> (2018/08/30 21:58), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > (2018/08/30 20:37), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> >> At Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:45:35 +0900, Etsuro
> >> Fujita wrote
> >> in<5b7ffdef.6020...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:26:51AM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> What version of GNU Make is on there, do you know? Tom? I don't see it
> mentioned in the output anywhere.
I don't know it. What I can see is that the use of "else ifdef" is
forbidden. You could bypass the problem with more ifdef-o
> "Michael" == Michael Paquier writes:
>> What version of GNU Make is on there, do you know? Tom? I don't see
>> it mentioned in the output anywhere.
Michael> I don't know it.
Consulting old manuals suggests it may have version 3.80 (c. 2002),
which lacks the 'else if..' syntax introduce
>
> Something which would be good to have for all those queries is a set of
> isolation tests. No need for multiple specs, you could just use one
> spec with one session defining all the object types you would like to
> work on. How did you find this object list? Did you test all the
> objects a
On 05/09/2018 02:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> My current proposal is thus to do add a check that does
> #if defined(__clang__) && defined(__i386__) && !defined(__SSE2_MATH__)
> something-that-fails
> #endif
> in an autoconf test, and have configure complain if that
> fails. Something roughly along th
At Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:05:55 +0300, Alexander Korotkov
wrote in
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:16 PM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> wrote:
> > I agree that fillfactor should be ignored in certain cases
> > (inserting the first tuple into empty pages or something like
> > that). Even though GiST doesn't need
> 5 сент. 2018 г., в 13:29, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> написал(а):
>
> We don't preserve it for Andrey's use case.
Just my 2 cents: that was a hacky use case for development reasons. I think
that removing fillfactor is good idea and your latest patch looks good from my
POV.
Best regards, Andrey B
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:45 AM R, Siva wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 09:16 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > Do you have a test scenario for reproduction of this issue? We need
> > it to ensure that fix is correct.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have a way of reproducing this issue.
> So far I
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:22 AM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
>>
>> The current version of patch doesn't really distinguish spaces and
>> delimiters in format string in non-FX mode. So, spaces and delimiters
>> are forming single group. F
Hi,
I have a bug in Windows 7 with max_files_per_process> 1200.
Using dup (0) in the function count_usable_fds more than 1200 times (0
= stdin) causes further unpredictable errors with file operations.
When I open a real file and use its descriptor for the dup, no error
occurs. In the patch
Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-04
> I was reminded about that by recent news
> about an upcoming glibc/CLDR resync that is likely to affect
> PostgreSQL users (though, I guess, probably only when they do a major
> OS upgrade).
Or replicating/restoring a database to a newer host.
> ... or, on a Debian
(2018/08/30 21:58), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
(2018/08/30 20:37), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
At Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:45:35 +0900, Etsuro
Fujita wrote
in<5b7ffdef.6020...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
(2018/08/21 11:01), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
At Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:49:02 +0900, Etsuro
Fujita wrote
in<5b72c1ae.8010
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:26 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:45 AM R, Siva wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 09:16 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> > > Do you have a test scenario for reproduction of this issue? We need
> > > it to ensure that fix is correct.
> >
> >
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:05 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:22 AM David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The current version of patch doesn't really distinguish spaces and
> >> delimiters in format string
Hi,
I prepared next version of Background worker (cleaner) based on a retail
indextuple deletion patch.
This version shows stable behavior on regression tests and pgbench
workloads.
In this version:
1. Only AccessShareLock are acquired on a cleanup of heap and index
relations.
2. Some 'aggre
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:10 PM amul sul wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:05 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:22 AM David G. Johnston
> > wrote:
> > > From those results the question is how important is it to force the
> > > following breakage on our users (i.e., intr
On 2018-Sep-05, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/09/05 1:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Proposed patch. Checking isnull in a elog(ERROR) is important, because
> > the column is not marked NOT NULL. This is not true for other columns
> > where we simply do Assert(!isnull).
>
> Looks good. Thanks fo
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 05/09/2018 02:51, Andres Freund wrote:
>> My current proposal is thus to do add a check that does
>> #if defined(__clang__) && defined(__i386__) && !defined(__SSE2_MATH__)
>> something-that-fails
>> #endif
>> in an autoconf test, and have configure complain if that fa
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:39 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:26 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:45 AM R, Siva wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 09:16 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> > > wrote:
> > > > Do you have a test scenario for reproduction o
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
