On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:15 PM Floris Van Nee wrote:
> Perhaps a question: when stepping through code in GDB, is there an easy way
> to pretty print for example the contents on an IndexTuple? I saw there's some
> tools out there that can pretty print plans, but viewing tuples is more
> complic
> Thanks for testing! You're right, looks like in the current implementation in
> case of backwards scan there is one unnecessary extra step forward. It seems
> this mistake was made, since I was concentrating only on the backward scans
> with a cursor, and used not exactly correct approach to wra
Greetings,
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 17:43 Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 2:43 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 17:07 Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 8:15 PM Robert Haas
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 2:43 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 17:07 Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 8:15 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ian Barwick
>> > wrote:
>> > > In Pg12, the code in pg_basebackup implies
Greetings,
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 17:07 Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 8:15 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ian Barwick
> > wrote:
> > > In Pg12, the code in pg_basebackup implies the correct thing to do is
> append to .auto.conf,
> > > but as demo
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:31 PM Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>
> > If anybody does complain, my first reaction would be to make ALTER
> > SYSTEM strip all comment lines too.
>
> Uh, I believe it already does?
>
Yeah, I also think so.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapil
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 8:15 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ian Barwick
> wrote:
> > In Pg12, the code in pg_basebackup implies the correct thing to do is
> > append to .auto.conf,
> > but as demonstrated that can cause problems with duplicate entries.
>
> Yeah.
>
> T
>
> > So what is the uptake on implementing this at the server side, ie.
> > DESCRIBE?
>
> I'm pretty skeptical of this idea, unless you are willing to throw
> away at least one and possibly both of the following goals:
>
> 1. Compatibility with psql's existing \d behavior.
>
I don't think *compat
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:17 PM Floris Van Nee
wrote:
> The following sql statement seems to have incorrect results - some logic
in
> the backwards scan is currently not entirely right.
Thanks for testing! You're right, looks like in the current implementation
in
case of backwards scan there i
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:50:33AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 23:35, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 06:55:41AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>I'm not sure it's easy to justify ordering by Abs(freq-base_freq)/freq
>though, because that would seem likely to put
The following sql statement seems to have incorrect results - some logic in the
backwards scan is currently not entirely right.
-Floris
drop table if exists a;
create table a (a int, b int, c int);
insert into a (select vs, ks, 10 from generate_series(1,5) vs,
generate_series(1, 1) ks);
cr
11 matches
Mail list logo
