Il giorno lun 10 apr 2023 alle ore 04:58 Andres Freund
ha scritto:
> We should definitely let the brtfs folks know of this issue... It's possible
> that this bug was recently introduced even. What kernel version did you repro
> this on Thomas?
In these days on BTRFS ml they are discussing about D
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:57 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Have you tried to write a reproducer for this that doesn't involve postgres?
I tried a bit. I'll try harder soon.
> ... What kernel version did you repro
> this on Thomas?
Debian's 6.0.10-2 kernel (Debian 12 on a random laptop). Here's ho
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 7:27 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> Debian's 6.0.10-2 kernel (Debian 12 on a random laptop).
Realising I hadn't updated for a bit, I did so and it still reproduces on:
$ uname -a
Linux x1 6.1.0-7-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.20-1
(2023-03-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux
On 05.04.2023 03:41, Melanie Plageman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 4:35 PM Pavel Luzanov wrote:
After a little thought... I'm not sure about the term 'bootstrap
process'. I can't find this term in the documentation.
There are various mentions of "bootstrap" peppered throughout the docs
but n
Hello, we encountered unexpected behavior from an ECPG program
complied with the -C ORACLE option. The program executes the
following query:
SELECT 123::numeric(3,0), 't'::char(2)";
Compilation and execution steps:
$ ecpg -C ORACLE ecpgtest.pgc (attached)
$ gcc -g -o ecpgtest ecpgtest.c -L `pg
When I am working on "Pushing limit into subqueries of a union" [1], I
found we already have a great infrastructure to support this. For a query
like
subquery-1 UNION ALL subquery-2 LIMIT 3;
We have considered the root->tuple_fraction when planning the subqueries
without an extra Limit node as an
Dear Julien,
> Well, even if physical replication slots were eventually preserved during
> pg_upgrade, maybe users would like to only keep one kind of the others so
> having both options could make sense.
You meant to say that we can rename options like "logical-*" and later add a new
option for
Dear Julien,
Thank you for giving idea! I have analyzed about it.
> > > If
> > > yes, how does this work if some subscriber node isn't connected when the
> > > publisher node is stopped? I guess you could add a check in pg_upgrade to
> make
> > > sure that all logical slot are indeed caught up a
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 3:28 PM Richard Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 3:13 PM Richard Guo wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 12:07 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> [ wanders away wondering if JOIN_RIGHT_SEMI should become a thing ... ]
>>
>> Maybe this is something we can do. Currently for the q
On Friday, April 7, 2023 11:23 amhouzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 7, 2023 11:13 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
>
> >
> > On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 7:35 PM shveta malik
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:43 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Atta
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:52 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> Sorry, there was a miss when rebasing the patch which could cause the
> CFbot to fail and here is the correct patch set.
>
I see the following note in the patch: "Note: For ATTACH/DETACH
PARTITION, we haven't added extra logic on th
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 11:06 PM Emre Hasegeli wrote:
>
> I was reading the logical replication code and found a little
> unnecessary work we are doing.
>
> The confirmed_flushed_lsn cannot reasonably be ahead of the
> current_lsn, so there is no point of calling
> LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation()
HI,
On Apr 10, 2023, 16:35 +0800, Andy Fan , wrote:
> When I am working on "Pushing limit into subqueries of a union" [1], I
> found we already have a great infrastructure to support this. For a query
> like
>
> subquery-1 UNION ALL subquery-2 LIMIT 3;
>
> We have considered the root->tuple_fract
Greetings,
* Thomas Munro (thomas.mu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 6:40 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > The exact same thing applies to FreeBSD, except that their in-core
> > Heimdal is ancient (1.5.2). Also, they do have MIT Kerberos
> > available as a package [1]. I'd been misled by th
Stephen Frost writes:
> Yeah, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if many folks running
> FreeBSD with any interest in Kerberos have MIT Kerberos installed given
> that Heimdal doesn't seem to be under any kind of ongoing active
> development and is just in this maintenance mode.
Yeah, that's a
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost writes:
> > Yeah, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if many folks running
> > FreeBSD with any interest in Kerberos have MIT Kerberos installed given
> > that Heimdal doesn't seem to be under any kind of ongoing active
> > deve
Stephen Frost writes:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> IOW, maybe it'd be okay to de-revert 3d4fa227b and add documentation
>> saying that --with-gssapi requires MIT Kerberos not Heimdal.
> I'd be happy with that and can add the appropriate documentation noting
> that we require MIT Ke
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:35 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> Do we need to have a check for this new option "password_required" in
> maybe_reread_subscription() where we "Exit if any parameter that
> affects the remote connection was changed."? This new option is
> related to the remote connection so I tho
Nonetheless PostgreSQL min/max functions don't work with JSON - array_agg
distinct does!
I was working on an experimental napkin audit feature.
It rewrites a chain of SQL queries to thread through meta data about all
computations contributed to every column.
Every data column gets a meta column wi
"Yu Shi (Fujitsu)" writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 6:26 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do see a docs change that I think would be worth making: get
>> rid of the explicit mention of it in create_subscription.sgml
>> in favor of using that view.
> I agree and I tried to modify the query to use the view.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 9:29 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I think that parameters used by the backend process when performing
> CREATE SUBSCRIPTION belong to the first category. And other parameters
> used by apply workers and tablesync workers belong to the second
> category. Since slot_name is use
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 3:30 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> I guess I'd vote for pulling the trigger in v16 if we can get that
> done by the end of April. Once we're close to beta I think it
> must wait for v17 to open.
I think that sounds reasonable. It would be to the project's advantage
not to have to m
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 10:54 AM Joseph Koshakow wrote:
> is_superuser feels a little out of place in this file. All of
> the options here apply to the entire PostgreSQL server, while
> is_superuser only applies to the current session. The description of
> this file says :
>
> > These options repor
Robert Haas writes:
> However, if this is the direction we're going, we probably need to
> give pgsql-packagers a heads up ASAP, because anybody who is still
> relying on the MSVC system to build Windows binaries is presumably
> going to need some time to adjust. If we rip out the build system
> s
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:56 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > However, if this is the direction we're going, we probably need to
> > give pgsql-packagers a heads up ASAP, because anybody who is still
> > relying on the MSVC system to build Windows binaries is presumably
> > going to
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:34 PM Yurii Rashkovskii wrote:
> I'm trying to understand what's wrong with reading port from the pid file (if
> Postgres writes information there, it's surely so that somebody can read it,
> otherwise, why write it in the first placd)? The proposed solution uses
> oper
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 18:34, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:56 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas writes:
> > > However, if this is the direction we're going, we probably need to
> > > give pgsql-packagers a heads up ASAP, because anybody who is still
> > > relying on the MSVC
On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 5:12 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I noticed that the nbtree VACUUM and DELETE record types have their
> update/xl_btree_update arrays output incorrectly. We cannot use the
> generic array_desc() approach with xl_btree_update elements, because
> they're variable-width elements
> + case 'P': /* Parallel progress reporting */
I kept this comment as-is but inside case code block I added
more comments. This is to avoid cluttering up the one-liner comment.
> + * Increase and report the number of index scans. Also, we reset the progress
> + * counters.
> The counters rese
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:56 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Robert Haas writes:
> > However, if this is the direction we're going, we probably need to
> > give pgsql-packagers a heads up ASAP, because anybody who is still
> > relying on the MSVC system to build Windows binaries is presumably
> > going to
Magnus Hagander writes:
> Thus, +1 on actually keeping it up and dropping it immediately as v17
> opens, giving them a year of advantage. And probably updating the docs
> (if anybody were to read them.. but at least then we tried) stating
> that it's deprecated and will be removed in v17.
Yeah, I
On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 8:12 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 4:46 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > Pushed that one too.
>
> I noticed that the nbtree VACUUM and DELETE record types have their
> update/xl_btree_update arrays output incorrectly. We cannot use the
> generic array_de
Hi,
On 2023-04-10 19:55:35 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Projects other than the EDB installers use the MSVC build system - e.g.
> pgAdmin uses it’s own builds of libpq and other tools (psql, pg_dump etc)
> that are pretty heavily baked into a fully automated build system (even the
> build servers and
Hi,
On 2023-04-10 16:50:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I think that's the only feasible answer at this point.
> Maybe a month or two back we could have done differently,
> but there's not a lot of runway now.
>
> Once we do drop src/tools/msvc from HEAD, we should make a point
> of reminding -
Hi,
On 2023-04-10 08:14:18 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 12:01:17PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Why would it mean that? Parallel workers are updated together with the
> > leader,
> > so there's no compatibility issue?
>
> My point is that the callback system would s
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 3:04 PM Melanie Plageman
wrote:
> I took a look at the first patch even though you've pushed the bugfix
> part. Any reason you didn't use array_desc() for the inner array (of
> "ptids")? I find that following the pattern of using array_desc (when it
> is correct, of course!
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 03:32:19PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On IM Thomas made some point about CI - I wonder if we should add building 16
> with src/tools/msvc as an optional CI task? We can't enable it by default
> (yet), because we'd not have enough resources to also run that for cfbot. Once
On 4/10/23 4:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander writes:
Thus, +1 on actually keeping it up and dropping it immediately as v17
opens, giving them a year of advantage. And probably updating the docs
(if anybody were to read them.. but at least then we tried) stating
that it's deprecated and w
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 9:07 AM Melanie Plageman
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 2:53 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:08 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 7 Apr 2023, at 00:12, Melanie Plageman
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 5:45 PM
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 04:31:44PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 3:04 PM Melanie Plageman
> wrote:
> >
> > I will say that the prefix of p in "ptid" makes it sound like pointer to
> > a tid, which I don't believe is what you meant.
>
> I was thinking of the symbol name
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 5:23 PM Melanie Plageman
wrote:
> If you keep the name, I'd explain it briefly in a comment above the code
> then -- for those of us who spend less time with btrees. It is a tool
> that will be often used by developers, so it is not unreasonable to
> assume they may read th
Hi,
On 2023-04-10 19:27:27 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:57 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > Have you tried to write a reproducer for this that doesn't involve postgres?
>
> I tried a bit. I'll try harder soon.
>
> > ... What kernel version did you repro
> > this on Thomas?
Hi hackers,
Thank you for developing a great feature.
The following commit added a column to the pg_subscription catalog.
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=482675987bcdffb390ae735cfd5f34b485ae97c6
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=c3afe
Hi,
On 2023-04-10 18:55:26 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-04-10 19:27:27 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:57 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Have you tried to write a reproducer for this that doesn't involve
> > > postgres?
> >
> > I tried a bit. I'll try harder so
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:15 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> And the fix has been merged into
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git/log/?h=for-next
>
> I think that means it'll have to wait for 6.4 development to open (in a few
> weeks), and then will be merged into the stabl
On 4/10/23 11:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost writes:
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
IOW, maybe it'd be okay to de-revert 3d4fa227b and add documentation
saying that --with-gssapi requires MIT Kerberos not Heimdal.
I'd be happy with that and can add the appropriate documentatio
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:31 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> Have you tried running the tests in src/test/kerberos with elver? Or is
> it configured to run them? Would be awesome if it could be, or if
> there's issues with running the tests on FBSD w/ MIT Kerberos, I'd be
> happy to try and help work
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:31 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> I tried to find out what POSIX says about this
(But of course whatever it might say is of especially limited value
when O_DIRECT is in the picture, being completely unstandardised.
Really I guess all they meant was "if you *copy* something tha
As the comment above add_path() says, 'The pathlist is kept sorted by
total_cost, with cheaper paths at the front.' And it seems that
get_cheapest_parallel_safe_total_inner() relies on this ordering
(without being mentioned in the comments, which I think we should do).
I'm wondering if this is the
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 09:26:25AM +0700, Yurii Rashkovskii wrote:
> > I want to chime in on the issue of lower-number releases that are
> > released after higher-number releases. The way I see this particular
> > problem is that we always put upgrade SQL files in release "packages,"
> > and they
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:03 AM Richard Guo wrote:
> As the comment above add_path() says, 'The pathlist is kept sorted by
> total_cost, with cheaper paths at the front.' And it seems that
> get_cheapest_parallel_safe_total_inner() relies on this ordering
> (without being mentioned in the comme
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 11:23 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 7, 2023 11:13 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
>
> >
> > On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 7:35 PM shveta malik
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:43 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Attach the n
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 11:23 AM Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰 wrote:
>
Thanks for updating the patch set.
Here are some comments:
1. The function deparse_drop_command in 0001 patch and the function
publication_deparse_ddl_command_end in 0002 patch.
```
+/*
+ * Handle deparsing of DROP commands.
+ *
+ * Verbose
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:53 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:31 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Have you tried running the tests in src/test/kerberos with elver? Or is
> > it configured to run them? Would be awesome if it could be, or if
> > there's issues with running the tests
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 11:12:26AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/test/recovery/t/035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
> @@ -0,0 +1,720 @@
> +# logical decoding on standby : test logical decoding,
> +# recovery conflict and standby promotion.
...
> +$node_primary->append_conf('p
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 13:44, David Rowley wrote:
> Anyway, I'll set an alarm for this time next year so I can check on
> how many inconsistencies have crept back in over the development
> cycle.
That alarm went off today.
There seem to be only 3 "a SQL"s in the docs to change to "an SQL".
This
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 07:06:22AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Not sure about this one. I have considered it and dirmod.c includes
> also bits for cygwin, while being aimed for higher-level routines like
> rename(), unlink() or symlink(). This patch is only for WIN32, and
> aimed for common p
Hi all,
While doing a few things on Windows with meson, I have noticed that,
while we output some information related to bison after a setup step,
there is nothing about flex.
I think that adding something about flex in the "Programs" section
would be pretty useful, particularly for Windows as th
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:43:04PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> That alarm went off today.
>
> There seem to be only 3 "a SQL"s in the docs to change to "an SQL".
>
> This is a pretty old thread, so here's a link [1] to the discussion.
Good catches!
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP si
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 08:15:11AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> The attached patch (pg_recvlogical_graceful_interrupt.text) has a
> couple of problems, I believe. We're losing prepareToTerminate() with
> keepalive true and we're not skipping pg_log_error("unexpected
> termination of replicatio
cfbot [1] is listing some already committed patches under the "Needs
Review" category. For example here are some of mine [1][2]. And
because they are already committed, the 'apply' fails, so they get
flagged by cfbot as needed rebase.
Something seems broken.
--
[1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/n
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 05:25:46PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Wouldn't storing the value in the shared memory itself work? Though,
> that space does become almost dead for the server's lifetime...
Sure, it would work. However, we'd still need an interface for the
extra function. At this p
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:16 PM Peter Smith wrote:
> cfbot [1] is listing some already committed patches under the "Needs
> Review" category. For example here are some of mine [1][2]. And
> because they are already committed, the 'apply' fails, so they get
> flagged by cfbot as needed rebase.
>
>
63 matches
Mail list logo
