Thank you, Tom. You’re absolutely right―this change is not necessary. I’ve
updated the patch accordingly.
Best regards,
Haibo
发件人: Tom Lane
发送时间: 2025年6月16日 12:46
收件人: Yan Haibo
抄送: Peter Eisentraut ; pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
主题: Re: 回复: 回复: Fix
Thank you. Peter. It seems the patch may have been lost during our earlier
communication, so I’ve reattached it here.
I hope it comes through correctly this time.
Best regards,
Haibo
发件人: Peter Eisentraut
发送时间: 2025年6月11日 00:43
收件人: Yan Haibo ; pgsql-hackers
发件人: Tom Lane
发送时间: 2025年6月16日 11:28
收件人: Yan Haibo
抄送: Peter Eisentraut ; pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
主题: Re: 回复: Fix potential overflow risks from wcscpy and sprintf
Yan Haibo writes:
> Thank you. Peter. It seems the patch may have been lost during our earlier
> communicati
Thank you. Peter. It seems the patch may have been lost during our earlier
communication, so I’ve reattached it here.
I hope it comes through correctly this time.
Best regards,
Haibo
发件人: Peter Eisentraut
发送时间: 2025年6月11日 00:43
收件人: Yan Haibo ; pgsql-hackers
This change stems from a recent static code analysis, which identified a minor
potential overflow issue. I would appreciate it if someone could review the fix
at their convenience.
Thank you for your time and support.
Best regards,
Haibo
0001-Mitigate-potential-overflow-risks-from-wcscpy-and-s