Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] pg_upgrade can result in early wraparound on databases with high transaction load

2024-05-17 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 16 May 2024, at 19:47, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, it's not worth working harder than this. I do see one typo > in your comment: s/supported then/supported when/. LGTM otherwise. Thanks for review, I've pushed this (with the fix from above) to 14 through 12. -- Daniel Gustafsson

Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] pg_upgrade can result in early wraparound on databases with high transaction load

2024-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
Daniel Gustafsson writes: >> On 5 Jul 2022, at 18:59, Tom Lane wrote: >> Given the lack of field complaints, it's probably not worth trying >> to do anything to restore that capability. But we really ought to >> update pg_upgrade's code and docs in pre-v15 branches to say that >> the minimum

Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] pg_upgrade can result in early wraparound on databases with high transaction load

2024-05-16 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 5 Jul 2022, at 18:59, Tom Lane wrote: > Given the lack of field complaints, it's probably not worth trying > to do anything to restore that capability. But we really ought to > update pg_upgrade's code and docs in pre-v15 branches to say that > the minimum supported source version is 9.0.