On 12/02/2020 05:35, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05:25AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> No objections here. I'm glad that we put in the effort to get more
>> opinions, but I agree that an overall vote of ~58 to ~8 is a pretty
>> strong consensus.
>
> Clearly, so done as
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05:25AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> No objections here. I'm glad that we put in the effort to get more
> opinions, but I agree that an overall vote of ~58 to ~8 is a pretty
> strong consensus.
Clearly, so done as dcdbb5a.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 7:45 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:16:44AM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> > There is a little bit of overlap within those three groups but among the
> > minuscule percentage of our users that responded, the result is
> > overwhelmingly in favor of this
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:16:44AM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> There is a little bit of overlap within those three groups but among the
> minuscule percentage of our users that responded, the result is
> overwhelmingly in favor of this change.
Thanks Vik for handling that. So, it seems to me
On 06/02/2020 03:56, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 06/02/2020 03:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Robert Haas writes:
I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it
On 06/02/2020 03:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
>>> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
>>> If we've actually
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
>> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
>> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't
+1 one for this change, it's something I also add to every .psqlrc I setup.
So.. We have:
+1: Vik, Ian, Daniel, Alvaro, Christoph
+-0: Tom (?), Fabien (?)
I did not know I had a vote. I'm "+1" on this change, if that matters.
Just this morning I had a case where I wished I had the
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:30 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:20 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> > So.. We have:
> > +1: Vik, Ian, Daniel, Alvaro, Christoph
> > +-0: Tom (?), Fabien (?)
> > -1: Michael P.
>
> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
>
Robert Haas writes:
> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
> 4 votes is a broad consensus.
Fair point. I'm still
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:20 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> So.. We have:
> +1: Vik, Ian, Daniel, Alvaro, Christoph
> +-0: Tom (?), Fabien (?)
> -1: Michael P.
I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 10:31:43AM +0900, Ian Barwick wrote:
> The last change I recall affecting default psql behaviour was the addition
> of COMP_KEYWORD_CASE in 9.2 (db84ba65), which personally I (and no doubt
> others)
> found annoying, but the world still turns.
>
> +1 one for this change,
On 2020/02/03 23:40, Tom Lane wrote:
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
On 3 Feb 2020, at 08:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
FWIW, I am not really in favor of changing a default old enough that
it could vote (a45195a).
That by itself doesn't seem a good reason to not change things.
My concern would
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> On 3 Feb 2020, at 08:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> FWIW, I am not really in favor of changing a default old enough that
>> it could vote (a45195a).
> That by itself doesn't seem a good reason to not change things.
> My concern would be that users who have never ever
On 2020-Feb-03, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 3 Feb 2020, at 08:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I am not really in favor of changing a default old enough that
> > it could vote (a45195a).
>
> That by itself doesn't seem a good reason to not change things.
Yeah.
> My concern would be
> On 3 Feb 2020, at 08:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> FWIW, I am not really in favor of changing a default old enough that
> it could vote (a45195a).
That by itself doesn't seem a good reason to not change things.
My concern would be that users who have never ever considered that the prompt
can
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:51:10PM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Would you mind changing the status in the commitfest app?
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2427/
FWIW, I am not really in favor of changing a default old enough that
it could vote (a45195a).
--
On 29/01/2020 08:25, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello Vik,
>
>>> Isn't there examples in the documentation which use the default prompts?
>>>
>>> If so, should they be updated accordingly?
>>
>> Good catch!
>> I thought about the documentation but not the examples therein.
>>
>> Updated patch
Hello Vik,
Isn't there examples in the documentation which use the default prompts?
If so, should they be updated accordingly?
Good catch!
I thought about the documentation but not the examples therein.
Updated patch attached.
Ok.
Only one transaction prompt example in the whole
On 26/01/2020 19:48, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello Vik,
>
>> I cannot ever think of a time when I don't want to know if I'm in a
>> transaction or not (and what its state is). Every new setup I do, I add
>> %x to the psql prompt.
>>
>> I think it should be part of the default prompt. Path
Hello Vik,
I cannot ever think of a time when I don't want to know if I'm in a
transaction or not (and what its state is). Every new setup I do, I add
%x to the psql prompt.
I think it should be part of the default prompt. Path attached.
Isn't there examples in the documentation which
Re: Vik Fearing 2020-01-26
<09502c40-cfe1-bb29-10f9-4b3fa7b2b...@2ndquadrant.com>
> I cannot ever think of a time when I don't want to know if I'm in a
> transaction or not (and what its state is). Every new setup I do, I add
> %x to the psql prompt.
>
> I think it should be part of the default
I cannot ever think of a time when I don't want to know if I'm in a
transaction or not (and what its state is). Every new setup I do, I add
%x to the psql prompt.
I think it should be part of the default prompt. Path attached.
--
Vik Fearing
>From 6118b8b2ab4cfc70525666b8d57eaa351d6c2a3d Mon
23 matches
Mail list logo
