On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 02:57:45PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 03:49:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I just apply a two-week rule here, as of half the commit fest
> > period to let people the time to react:
> > - If a patch has been waiting on author
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 03:49:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:00:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Agreed, we're not here to cause make-work for submitters. RWF is
> > appropriate if the patch has been in Waiting On Author for awhile
> > and doesn't seem to be go
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:00:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Agreed, we're not here to cause make-work for submitters. RWF is
> appropriate if the patch has been in Waiting On Author for awhile
> and doesn't seem to be going anywhere, but otherwise we should
> just punt it to the next CF.
FWIW, I
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:10:39PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:00:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, thanks to Julien for doing this mostly-thankless task
> > this time!
> >
>
> Agreed, great work!
Thanks a lot :)
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:00:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Anyway, thanks to Julien for doing this mostly-thankless task
> this time!
>
Agreed, great work!
--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL
Jaime Casanova writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:28:53AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> If we close all patches that had a review just because they weren't perfect
>> in
>> their initial submission, we're just going to force everyone to re-register
>> their patch for every single commit fest.
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:45:40PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:28:53AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > My understanding of "Returned with Feedback" is that the patch implements
> > something wanted, but as proposed won't be accepted without a major
> > redesign
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:28:53AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> My understanding of "Returned with Feedback" is that the patch implements
> something wanted, but as proposed won't be accepted without a major redesign
> or
> something like that. Not patches that are going through normal "revi
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:09:06PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> I gave two reviews and received one review but the patches have been
> "Moved to next CF".
For now I only moved to the next commit fest the patches that were in "Needs
Review" or "Ready for Committer". I'm assuming that you failed
I gave two reviews and received one review but the patches have been
"Moved to next CF". Should I update them to "Returned with Feedback"
given they all did get feedback? I was under the impression "Moved to
next CF" was only for patches that didn't get feedback in a CF and
were still waiting for f
Hi,
It's now at least Feb. 1st anywhere on earth, so the commit fest is now over.
Since last week 5 entries were committed, 1 withdrawn, 3 returned with
feedback, 2 already moved to the next commitfest and 1 rejected.
This gives a total of 211 patches still alive, most of them ready for the next
Hi,
This is the 4th week of this commitfest.
Since last week, 5 entries were committed. There are still overall 223 active
patches, the vast majority needing review. If you signed up to review patches,
you still have a whole week to help patch making progress and getting
committed!
Status summ
Hi,
This is the beginning of the 3rd week of this commit fest.
Since my last email 5 days ago, 6 patches were committed and a few patches
closed. There are still overall 229 active patches, most of them
unsurprisingly waiting for review.
The cfbot is doing a great job at early problem detection
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:41:42PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The January commitfest should have started almost two weeks ago, but given
> that
> nothing happened until now I think that it's safe to assume that either
> everyone forgot or no one wanted to volunteer.
>
> I'm therfore
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:41:42PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> The January commitfest should have started almost two weeks ago, but given
> that
> nothing happened until now I think that it's safe to assume that either
> everyone forgot or no one wanted to volunteer.
Thanks, Julien!
--
Michael
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:16:36PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:42 AM Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > Note that I don't have admin permissions on the cf app, so I'd be glad if
> > something could grant it!
>
> Granted!
Thanks Magnus!
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:42 AM Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> Note that I don't have admin permissions on the cf app, so I'd be glad if
> something could grant it!
Granted!
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:11 AM Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> The January commitfest should have started almost two weeks ago, but given
> that
> nothing happened until now I think that it's safe to assume that either
> everyone forgot or no one wanted to volunteer.
>
> I'm therfore volunteering to
18 matches
Mail list logo
