Em seg., 1 de abr. de 2024 às 14:52, Tom Lane escreveu:
> "Euler Taveira" writes:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, at 8:50 PM, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> >> Coverity has some reports in the new code
> >> pg_createsubscriber.c
> >> I think that Coverity is right.
>
> > It depends on your "right"
"Euler Taveira" writes:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, at 8:50 PM, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> Coverity has some reports in the new code
>> pg_createsubscriber.c
>> I think that Coverity is right.
> It depends on your "right" definition. If your program execution is ephemeral
> and the leak is just before
Em qua., 27 de mar. de 2024 às 23:08, Euler Taveira
escreveu:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, at 8:50 PM, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> Coverity has some reports in the new code
> pg_createsubscriber.c
> I think that Coverity is right.
>
>
> It depends on your "right" definition.
>
I do not think so.
If
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, at 8:50 PM, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Coverity has some reports in the new code
> pg_createsubscriber.c
> I think that Coverity is right.
It depends on your "right" definition. If your program execution is ephemeral
and the leak is just before exiting, do you think it's worth
