Vik Fearing writes:
> I don't suppose project policy would allow us to use an external
> library. I assume there is one out there that implements XQuery regular
> expressions.
Probably, but is it in C and does it have a compatible license?
The bigger picture here is that our track record
On 12/18/22 15:24, Tom Lane wrote:
Vik Fearing writes:
Are there any objections to me writing a patch to add SQL Standard
regular expression functions even though they call for XQuery and we
would use our own language?
Yes. If we provide spec-defined syntax it should have spec-defined
Vik Fearing writes:
> Are there any objections to me writing a patch to add SQL Standard
> regular expression functions even though they call for XQuery and we
> would use our own language?
Yes. If we provide spec-defined syntax it should have spec-defined
behavior. I really don't see the
The standard uses XQuery regular expressions, which I believe are subtly
different from ours. Because of that, I had been hesitant to add some
standard functions to our library such as .
While looking at commit 6424337073589476303b10f6d7cc74f501b8d9d7 from
last year (which will come up soon
