HiGreat, thank you! regards, Sergei
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:57:46AM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> Looks fine, thanks. I tested against HEAD and v11.2 with and without
> -R in both plain and tar formats.
Same here, so I have committed the patch.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi
> No problem. Thanks for the patch, the logic looks good and I made
> some adjustments as attached. Does that look fine to you?
Looks fine, thanks. I tested against HEAD and v11.2 with and without -R in both
plain and tar formats.
regards, Sergei
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 01:42:16PM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> My fault. I thought pg_basebackup works only with same major version, sorry.
> How about attached patch?
No problem. Thanks for the patch, the logic looks good and I made
some adjustments as attached. Does that look fine to you?
Hello
My fault. I thought pg_basebackup works only with same major version, sorry.
How about attached patch?
regards, Sergeidiff --git a/src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c b/src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c
index 3d2d4cd0b9..e1aa2c1cfc 100644
--- a/src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c
++
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 11:55:12AM +0300, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> Apologies if this has been discussed before: When I run pg_basebackup in git
> head against v11 server, it treats v11 as v12: Does not create recovery.conf,
> adds recovery parameters to postgresql.auto.conf, and also creates
> stand
Hi,
Apologies if this has been discussed before: When I run pg_basebackup in git
head against v11 server, it treats v11 as v12: Does not create recovery.conf,
adds recovery parameters to postgresql.auto.conf, and also creates
standby.signal file. Is this expected, or a bug?
Regards,
--
Devrim