At 08:38 PM 15-04-2001 -0700, you wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 10:05:46PM -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
Maybe you guys should get some Great Bridge marketing/PR person to handle
stuff like this.
After reading Ned's comments I figured that's how
What does this error mean - and how can I avoid it in the future?
postmaster: StreamConnection: accept: Too many open files in system
Any help would be much appreciated!
Ryan Mahoney
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does this error mean - and how can I avoid it in the future?
postmaster: StreamConnection: accept: Too many open files in system
Any help would be much appreciated!
Ryan Mahoney
It would be helpful if you could give more information, but if you are
I noticed that 7.1 has officially been released. Does anyone know the status
of the bug I reported regarding encoding problems when dumping a 7.0 db an
restoring on 7.1?
Thanks,
--Rainer
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
andrea gelmini writes:
debian unstable, i386.
upgrade libreadline 4.2
postgres doesn't compile.
It seems there were some incompatible changes in readline 4.2. Use
version 4.1 until we have a fix.
The essence of the problem seems to be
No, those don't do it. We need an actual NaN value. These are just
flags, I think.
gmake -C adt SUBSYS.o
gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/users/dcarmich/postgresql-7.1/src/
backend/utils/adt'
cc -std -O4 -Olimit 2000 -I../../../../src/include -c -o float.o float.c
cc:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cc -std -O4 -Olimit 2000 -I../../../../src/include -c -o float.o float.c
cc: Error: float.c, line 251: In this statement, the libraries on this
platform do not yet support compile-time evaluation of the constant
expression "0.0/0.0". (constfoldns)
PostgreSQL 7.1 on Red Hat Linux 7.1[1]: All 76 tests passed.
I'll submit it to the website soonish.
[1] Available this morning,
http://www.redhat.com/about/presscenter/2001/press_sevenone.html
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrd
Red Hat, Inc.
---(end of
PostgreSQL 7.1 on Red Hat Linux 7.1[1]: All 76 tests passed.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrd
Red Hat, Inc.
It's about time RH saw the light and sync'd their release labeling with
ours ;)
- Thomas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5:
Trond Eivind Glomsrd wrote:
PostgreSQL 7.1 on Red Hat Linux 7.1[1]: All 76 tests passed.
I'll submit it to the website soonish.
[1] Available this morning,
http://www.redhat.com/about/presscenter/2001/press_sevenone.html
And RPMs are also available for 7.1 on 7.1 in our RPM area.
Red
I have looked and I have looked, it is not immediately clear to me how integer
arrays are passed to C function.
create table fubar (vars integer[]) ;
select c_function(vars) from fubar;
insert into fubar (vars) values ('{1,2,3,4,5,6}');
extern "C" c_function (varlena var)
{
mlw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have looked and I have looked, it is not immediately clear to me how
integer arrays are passed to C function.
See src/include/utils/array.h, also src/backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c
and src/backend/utils/adt/arrayutils.c. Beware: this code is pretty
messy.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:11:34PM -0400, Mitch Vincent wrote:
The "Current Release Docs" on the PostgreSQL website still look 7.0.Xish..
I can't finh the 7.1 PS docs anywhere. The stuff in the doc directory
on the FTP sites is from last year, and the docs in the tar files
are all SGML and
They're not ready yet.
Vince.
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Christopher Masto wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:11:34PM -0400, Mitch Vincent wrote:
The "Current Release Docs" on the PostgreSQL website still look 7.0.Xish..
I can't finh the 7.1 PS docs anywhere. The stuff in the doc directory
on
They're not ready yet.
Since they were deemed non-essential for this release, and since the
release schedule is not built around their creation, I no longer feel
obligated to have them finished on the release date. A nice change from
the deadlines I've been working on for the last three years
Call me thick as two planks, but when you guys constantly refer to 'schema
support' in PostgreSQL, what exactly are you referring to?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Saturday, 14 April 2001 5:46 AM
To: [EMAIL
I know this isn't really hackers traffic, but...
one of the servers in www.postgresql.org is
http://postgresql.bbksys.com/
which is giving me 404 errors..
I've mailed webmaster@, but thought this should be mailed on anyway..
- brandon
b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp:
The ability to place database objects into a logical partitioning of
data. For example, in Oracle, each user creates tables, views,
sequences, synonyms, and snapshots in their own schema. So if I were
to create a table called 'Employees', I could query it as:
SELECT * FROM employees;
But
Hi,
While doing some testing with Postgresql 7.1, I noticed some perculiar
behaviour with the JDBC driver. Selecting a single record from a table is
5-10 times slower than doing an insert (even if the table only contains a
single record, and the select query does not contain any join). On
yes, this is a bug in netbsd-current that was introduced with about 5 month
ago with the new unified buffer cache system. it has been fixed.
thanks.
From: Chuck Silvers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CVS commit: syssrc
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:37:44 +0300 (EEST)
May I please ask you guys a question about Postgres.pm. Right now I'm
working on a Red Hat 6.2, Apache 1.3.9 and Perl5. I've finally got
Apache setup which was no easy task even with a $80.00 Mohawk GUI
administration front end. But now I get the following from my perl/cgi
program error:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:07:26AM +, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
They're not ready yet.
Since they were deemed non-essential for this release, and since the
release schedule is not built around their creation, I no longer feel
obligated to have them finished on the release date. A nice
22 matches
Mail list logo
