Dann Corbit wrote:
[ ... ]
GDB works fine. Some of the other tools don't work right (e.g. sed is
broken).
Recent fixes exist, but I didn't check all of them. WorksForMe(TM), but my
projects are *much* simpler ...
Emmanuel Charpentier
---(end of broadcast)-
Jan Wieck wrote:
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ? That's a nice small and cozy unix-like
envoronment on tom of Windows. Add it emacs, and windoww becomes almost
tolerable ...
How good is the debugging support under mingW? Is it at least comparable
to using gdb under
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:54 PM
> To: Brian Bruns; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted
>
>
> Brian Bruns wrote:
>
> >Problem is, nobody builds packages o
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
download the binary a guy (usually literally "one guy") built. So, let's
just make sure that one guy has cygwin loaded on his machine and we'll be
all set.
Correct.
I wonder why we need a Windows port
Why don't you just include them by default, otherwise if WITHOUT OIDS
appears in the CREATE TABLE command, then don't include them ?
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2003 4:12 AM
> To: [EMA
Recommend always running "initdb -W" and setting all pg_hba entries to md5.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Treat
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 January 2003 11:17 PM
> To: Dan Langille
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACK
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Wieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:04 PM
> To: Emmanuel Charpentier
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted
>
>
> Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> >
> > Mingw and mingw-porte
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> Mingw and mingw-ported tools ? That's a nice small and cozy unix-like
> envoronment on tom of Windows. Add it emacs, and windoww becomes almost
> tolerable ...
How good is the debugging support under mingW? Is it at least comparable
to using gdb under unix? If not,
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ? That's a nice small and cozy unix-like
envoronment on tom of Windows. Add it emacs, and windoww becomes almost
tolerable ...
Emmanuel Charpentier
[ Back to lurking ... ]
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
download the binary a guy (usually literally "one guy") built. So, let's
just make sure that one guy has cygwin loaded on his machine and we'll be
all set.
Sorry, couldn't help myself...Seriously, it's a cultural thing, I w
On 21 Jan 2003, Doug McNaught wrote:
> It's all over Slashdot:
>
> http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/012003.html
>
That bit about 'This does not apply to :pserver: only' (probably slightly
paraphrased) is very confusing. I gather from later on in the page that it
means that the flaw only
It's all over Slashdot:
http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/012003.html
-Doug
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> > code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> > unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> > e
"Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> existing windows-only develope
We've gotten a couple of complaints now about the fact that 7.3 doesn't
include an OID column in a table created via CREATE TABLE AS or SELECT
INTO. Unless I hear objections, I'm going to revert it to including an
OID, and back-patch the fix for 7.3.2 as well. See discussion a couple
days ago on
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Al Sutton wrote:
> I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
> code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
> unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
> existing windows-only develope
I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
existing windows-only developers to work on the code. I see the Win32 patch
as
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't see a strong reason not
> > to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
> > requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
> > shell environment.
>
> Indeed. I think t
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see a strong reason not
> to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
> requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
> shell environment.
Indeed. I think the goal here is to have a port th
Rod Taylor writes:
> setting privileges on built-in objects... ok
> creating information schema... sed: 1: "s/^[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.\([0 ...":
> undefined label 'L;s/.*//;q;: L;s/.*\(\)$/\1/'
> ok
> vacuuming database template1... ok
Fixed. Consider filing a bug report with your operating sys
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> I remember a while back you were saying you were working on pg_dump object
> ordering? What happened with that? Did you need some help with it?
I don't remember that and I don't have any specific plans relating to
that.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan Wieck writes:
> I just submitted the patches for the native Win32 port of v7.2.1 on the
> patches mailing list.
I'm concerned that you are adding all these *.dsp files for build process
control. This is going to be a burden to maintain. Everytime someone
changes an aspect of how a file is b
I'm not sure how adequately these topics are covered elsewhere, but you
should probably provide at least a pointer if not improved information:
* Should have a mention of the pgcrypto code in contrib.
* Brain hiccup, but isn't there some type of "password" datatype
* Explanation of problems/solu
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 January 2003 21:28
> To: Didier Moens
> Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key wierdness
>
>
> Didier Moens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just formally tested o
24 matches
Mail list logo
