Please see the attached file.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > scott.marlowe writes:
> >
> > > If indexes on text worked right in other locales it would be no big deal.
> >
> > They will in version 7.4, so all these concerns about trading off locale
> > use vs. performance will become
Lamar,
I can understand you not wanting to install the components necessary to
build the various jdbc versions. So I would just request that you pull
the latest prebuilt version from jdbc.postgresql.org when doing a new RPM.
I will try to answer some of your other questions below.
Lamar Owen wro
Hardly.
SAP failed on the attempt to open source ADABAS even more miserably than
Borland with Interbase. Now it looks like they found someone who said
"we know open source, we can do that, oh pick me, me, me, pick mee!"
that's what i think as well.
by the way: did you see that MySQL AB has g
Hello:
> Sounds like you are sending junk following the Parse message.
You are right thanks very much, but now i have another problem, i don't
get response from the postgresql server, hummm this is what i'm sending
for test:
Byte1 ('P')
Int32 (40)
String ('')
String ('SELECT
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> scott.marlowe writes:
>
> > If indexes on text worked right in other locales it would be no big deal.
>
> They will in version 7.4, so all these concerns about trading off locale
> use vs. performance will become obsolete.
Oh! I thought there were
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, they are not actually removing it, just setting it to NULL, as
> > though a password was never assigned. We have a way for users to set
> > it, but no way for them to remove it.
>
> If they had a way to remove it, then they'd n
Barry Lind wrote:
Does anyone know why apparently the 7.3beta1 version of the jdbc drivers
are what is included in the 7.3.3 rpms?
No idea.
Just updated the "PostgreSQL Release Process" document though in case anyone (Marc) ever decides they're going to use it:
http://advocacy.postgresql.org/doc
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) Are any additional changes expected for GUC.c before feature-freeze?
I'm still thinking of adding an am_superuser variable so that psql can
rely on the new ParameterStatus mechanism instead of explicit queries to
find out if you're superuser. But this
On Thursday 05 June 2003 11:39, Barry Lind wrote:
> Does anyone know why apparently the 7.3beta1 version of the jdbc drivers
> are what is included in the 7.3.3 rpms?
> > The pg73b1jdbc3.jar file is very old (it is the 7.3 beta 1 version).
> > What RPMs are you using? You should contact whoever p
I realise large objects are liked anymore and that the wire protocol is
changing in 7.4 but I've just posted this message into the PHP documentation:
-- begin
Using php 4.3.0 and PostgreSQL 7.3.1
I can write a simple script in which pg_lo_write seems to always return 1 and not the
number of by
I think the issue is this part:
> What we now realize is that the spec says SUM(outervar) ought to be
> considered an aggregate evaluated at the outervar's query level, and
> then imported *as a whole* as an effective constant for the subquery.
>
> I claim that there should be nothing wrong with
Folks,
Last we talked (before the mail server went down) Tom had agreed in principle
to a re-ordering of postgresql.conf.sample and the "Run-Time Configuration"
docs page based on the attached ordering file.
I would like to make this happen before feature-freeze on June 15. To do
that, I nee
Darko Prenosil once said:
> I have noticed that after "/etc/init.d/postgresql restart", postmaster is no
> longer writes to "serverlog". (RedHat 9).
> Here is fixed "restart" section.
>
> restart)
> echo -n "Restarting PostgreSQL: "
> su - $PGUSER -c "$DAEMON restart -D '$PGDATA' -s -
I can't reproduce the above. Are you sure T2 isn't committing?
Arch, damn, yes, bugger...
If it were, since the default isolation level is read committed,
Ok, that explains it.
But my second question is still unanswered: Is the key value locking, that
is implemented in postgres, ARIES/KVL?
Is there an easy way of doing this? Insert was simple as all that
needed to be done was to throw away the reference to the column.
It would seem a new primnode (change InsertDef into SetDefault or
similar) will be required with some executor logic.
--
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Key: htt
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > That is one thing I liked about the initdb mention --- it clearly told
> > > them to watch out for something they might not have been looking for.
> >
> > Only
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When we considered outervar1 as a constant, we could do the aggregate in
> the subquery using computations, but when SUM(outervar1) is computed in
> an above query, combining that with anything that is part of different
> query level makes no sense to me
Rasmus Resen Amossen wrote:
> Does Postgres garantee repeatable-read (RR) during transactions? And
> does it implement ARIES/KVL?
>
> If so, why is the following possible?
>
> T1: begin;
> T1: select * from table;
> (notice the row with id = X)
> T2: begin;
> T2: delete from table where id = X
I wrote:
> Rasmus Resen Amossen wrote:
>
>
>>Does Postgres garantee repeatable-read (RR) during transactions? And
>>does it implement ARIES/KVL?
>>
>>If so, why is the following possible?
>>
>>T1: begin;
>>T1: select * from table;
>> (notice the row with id = X)
>>T2: begin;
>>T2: delete from t
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 22:28, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Which ones are missing, and should we really be looking at creating a
> > pg_definition_schema instead?
>
> Missing:
>
> Database, schema, table, domain, cast, conversion, function...
>
> Maybe a definition schema might be better...
Does anyone know why apparently the 7.3beta1 version of the jdbc drivers
are what is included in the 7.3.3 rpms?
--Barry
Original Message
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Official JDBC driver release ?
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 08:14:40 +0200
From: Thomas Kellerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAI
22 matches
Mail list logo
