Hi, Francisco,
Francisco Figueiredo Jr. schrieb:
In fact, I think people keep requesting me support on Npgsql for that
because MS Sql server supports it and they are porting their code to use
Postgresql and facing that difficult.
Indeed, for (a) we could use an approach similar to Ms sql
Hi, Tom,
Tom Lane schrieb:
Yeah, but only because you have to do it explicitly. I was wondering
whether we couldn't bury that mechanism under the hood. (In particular,
given the improved support in 8.0 for anonymous record types, we could
in theory have the backend invent a record type
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:15:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Uh, that seems like it adds extra complexity just for this single case.
Yeah. I've dropped the idea personally -- the suggestion that the table
owner can provide a SECURITY DEFINER procedure to
Hello everybody,
I'm having a problem with pgadmin II and III. When I try to access a
database it crash may system and I have to close it. I talk to my
friends and they have the same problem when they try to acces this
database. We can access this by a php page or asp but we can't do it by
Incidentally, Tom, you seem to be using a pretty bogus blackhole list that
includes blocking static address assignments based on the DNS records. I doubt
this achieves much in the way of spam filtering, but it's preventing you from
getting my mails. (Perhaps that's a good thing)
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, Christopher Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] transmitted:
It sure would be nice to be able to have a way to query the start
time of the eldest transaction on the system.
I can see this function available in the backend:
TransactionId
Tom Lane wrote:
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Assuming you're talkning about You might wonder why we don't order all
the regression test queries explicitly to get rid of this issue once and
for all. The reason is that that would make the regression tests less
useful, not more, since
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Richard Huxton wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Hi there,
what's wrong to use SERIAL as FK without explicit PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE ?
qq=# create table t1( id serial);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence t1_id_seq for
serial column t1.id
CREATE TABLE
qq=# create
Nicolai Tufar wrote:
Linux and Solaris 10 x86 pass regression tests fine when I force the use of
new
snprintf(). The problem should be win32 - specific. I will
investigate it throughly
tonight. Can someone experienced in win32 what can possibly be the problem?
Yea, I am confused too
I can see this function available in the backend:
TransactionId GetOldestXmin(bool alldbs);
The cost is based on walking thru each backend process, which I guess
is obvious, as if there are 47 backends, that means 47 xids.
Presumably not _too_ expensive; certainly something that has to be run
Linux and Solaris 10 x86 pass regression tests fine when I force the use of new
snprintf(). The problem should be win32 - specific. I will
investigate it throughly
tonight. Can someone experienced in win32 what can possibly be the problem?
Nick
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:07:16 +0100, Magnus
Thiago Luiz wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm having a problem with pgadmin II and III. When I try to access a
database it crash may system and I have to close it. I talk to my
friends and they have the same problem when they try to acces this
database. We can access this by a php page or asp but
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Hi there,
what's wrong to use SERIAL as FK without explicit PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE ?
qq=# create table t1( id serial);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence t1_id_seq for
serial column t1.id
CREATE TABLE
qq=# create table t2( id2 int4 references t1(id));
ERROR:
Hi there,
what's wrong to use SERIAL as FK without explicit PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE ?
qq=# create table t1( id serial);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence t1_id_seq for serial column
t1.id
CREATE TABLE
qq=# create table t2( id2 int4 references t1(id));
ERROR: there is no unique
Ok, I'm started porting it to 8.0.1 and will fix this also.
By the way, did you know any test suit for such queries? To make some
regression test.
Regards, Evgen
I tested you patch, and it's good work. I would all methods in PostgreSQL.
I found query which kill backand
WITH t AS (
SELECT
Linux and Solaris 10 x86 pass regression tests fine when I force the use
of new
snprintf(). The problem should be win32 - specific. I will
investigate it throughly
tonight. Can someone experienced in win32 what can possibly be the
problem?
Do we have any idea about what format string
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bruce Momjian
Sent: Sun 2/27/2005 12:54 AM
To: Magnus Hagander
Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Merlin Moncure
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Patch
Thanks to all replies on this thread over last few days, many good point
and useful contributions, thank you.
[Please excuse many non-replies, since I've been ill.]
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 09:41 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
- What are you working towards? Performance? Stability? X?
X, definitely
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
what's wrong to use SERIAL as FK without explicit PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE ?
Serial isn't enough to guarantee uniqueness as required by foreign keys.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:07:51AM +0300, Evgen Potemkin wrote:
Ok, I'm started porting it to 8.0.1 and will fix this also. By the
way, did you know any test suit for such queries? To make some
regression test.
Evgen,
Thanks very much for doing this work. Is there some way you can
After some extensive debugging with Magnus's
help we finally managed to a kind of isolate the
problem. We placed snprintf.c in a separate
file, added necessary #includes and wrote
a simple main() function:
main()
{
unsigned long long ull=4567890123456789ULL;
static char
Here's the design of bitmap AM I'm planning to implement. I've discussed it
with Neil, but I'm willing to get more feedback on it.
There are going to be 1 metapage, 1 list of CTIDs (LOC), one list
of attribute values (LOV, including attributes for multi-column indexes) and a
bitmap for each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we have any idea about what format string causes the regression failure?
I'll bet the problem is that configure.in is doing things in the wrong
order: it computes INT64_FORMAT against the system printf before
deciding we should use our own printf.
I'm curious what kind of performance differences there would be over
using something like the nested-set model?
Would this be faster, or slower?
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:02 +0300, Evgen Potemkin wrote:
Hi hackers!
I have done initial implementation of SQL99 WITH clause (attached).
It's now
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Evgen Potemkin wrote:
Ok, I'm started porting it to 8.0.1 and will fix this also.
By the way, did you know any test suit for such queries? To make some
regression test.
Hello, I can find some examples on internet and prepare regression tests.
I think PostgreSQL can
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
what's wrong to use SERIAL as FK without explicit PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE ?
Serial isn't enough to guarantee uniqueness as required by foreign keys.
you're certainly right !
Regards,
Oleg
Neither Bruce's nor subsequent Tom's patch did not fix
the issue. The command used is:
make maintainer-clean ./configure make make install make check
It should have be fine to recompile the source code
completely. I attach the resulting config.log. May be it
will give a clue. Regression test
Nicolai Tufar wrote:
Neither Bruce's nor subsequent Tom's patch did not fix
the issue. The command used is:
make maintainer-clean ./configure make make install make check
It should have be fine to recompile the source code
completely. I attach the resulting config.log. May be it
will
And while we are on it, I would like to submit minor
changes to make snprintf() vsnprintf() and printf()
functions in src/port/snprintf.c thread-safe.
Best regards,
Nicolai Tufar
Index: src/port/snprintf.c
===
RCS file:
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 10:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Assuming you're talkning about You might wonder why we don't order all
the regression test queries explicitly to get rid of this issue once and
for all. The reason is that that would make the
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Nicolai Tufar wrote:
And while we are on it, I would like to submit minor
changes to make snprintf() vsnprintf() and printf()
functions in src/port/snprintf.c thread-safe.
Best regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm playing with Execute messages with a non-zero max number of rows so
that I can get some PortalSuspended messages on Npgsql.
After some testing, I could send an Execute message with 2 as the manx
number of rows. After the second execute I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Schaber wrote:
| Hi, Francisco,
|
| Francisco Figueiredo Jr. schrieb:
|
|
|In fact, I think people keep requesting me support on Npgsql for that
|because MS Sql server supports it and they are porting their code to use
|Postgresql and facing
Tom Lane wrote:
I wouldn't mind seeing people be a little more vocal on the hackers list
about what they plan to be doing, just so that there's not duplication
of effort.
pg_upgrade
--
Serguei A. Mokhov| /~\The ASCII
Computer Science Department | \ / Ribbon Campaign
Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote:
After some testing, I could send an Execute message with 2 as the manx
number of rows. After the second execute I get the following:
portal does not exist
Severity: ERROR
Code: 34000
I noticed that I could only get it working if I explicitly create a
transaction.
I
Nicolai Tufar wrote:
Regression test diff is attached.
It fails on the following tests:
int8
subselect
union
sequence
It fails to display correctly number 4567890123456789.
In output is shows -869367531. Apparent overflow or
interpreting int8 as int4.
while rewriting
I keep seeing the following log output around every 5 minutes:
2005-02-28 23:25:05 [8646] LOG: 0: QUERY STATISTICS
DETAIL: ! system usage stats:
! 0.005023 elapsed 0.00 user 0.00 system sec
! [537.13 user 44.86 sys total]
! 0/0 [0/0]
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I can confirm your failure in current sources on Win32:
template1=# create table test(x int8);
CREATE TABLE
template1=# insert into test values ('4567890123456789');
INSERT 17235 1
template1=# select * from test;
x
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I keep seeing the following log output around every 5 minutes:
2005-02-28 23:25:05 [8646] LOG: 0: QUERY STATISTICS
This has to be coming from exec_simple_query():
if (save_log_statement_stats)
ShowUsage(QUERY STATISTICS);
so
Mike,
I'm curious what kind of performance differences there would be over
using something like the nested-set model?
Would this be faster, or slower?
The answer is yes.;-)
Which tree structures you use depends on what you're trying to accomplish and
what your use case is. There are
Victor Y. Yegorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Neil suggested a very good way how to handle updates. Of course, it's not
necessary to strictly follow tuple layout in the table's heap, as I wanted
to do initially. All that's needed, is that bit positions in bitmaps would
be tied with CTID
41 matches
Mail list logo
