On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 23:06 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
[about backup procedure with PITR documentation
I see in the docs:
To make use of this backup, you will need to keep around all the WAL
segment files generated at or after the starting time of the backup. To
aid you
Ragnar Hafstað wrote:
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 23:06 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
[about backup procedure with PITR documentation
I see in the docs:
To make use of this backup, you will need to keep around all the WAL
segment files generated at or after the starting time of the
Is it really an important area to improve, or are there other
priorities? I know some people wished we had better support for
inheritance, but how strong is that wish?
Hello,
From a people who call me perspective. I am never asked about
inheritance. Most of the people don't even know it is
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:56:01AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
From a people who call me perspective. I am never asked about
inheritance. Most of the people don't even know it is there.
The requests I get are:
Just wondering, does anybody asks you about the excessive locking (and
As the voice of someone who has a lot of experience with
some of the original inheritance, I would prefer to
have the select foo(t.*) from grandkid work for
completeness.
However, erroring out as ambiguous is not unreasonable
since we have to cast the hell out of everything usually.
I would
Greetings,
I suggest function for inet increment w/ int8 (signed).
FUNCTION inet_inc(int, int8) RETURNS inet
Function, useful for making address pools (using also
existing inet compare functions to trap boundaries).
Notes:
This version lets address wrap around 0-*ff boundary.
Uses
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:56:01AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Is it really an important area to improve, or are there other
priorities? I know some people wished we had better support for
inheritance, but how strong is that wish?
FWIW, I think people might be more likely to use the OO
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 14:04 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:56:01AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
From a people who call me perspective. I am never asked about
inheritance. Most of the people don't even know it is there.
The requests I get are:
Just wondering,
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 19:54 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
On Sunday 17 April 2005 19:30, Rod Taylor wrote:
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 14:04 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:56:01AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
From a people who call me perspective. I am never asked about
On Sunday 17 April 2005 19:30, Rod Taylor wrote:
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 14:04 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:56:01AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
From a people who call me perspective. I am never asked about
inheritance. Most of the people don't even know it is
From a people who call me perspective. I am never asked about
inheritance. Most of the people don't even know it is there.
The requests I get are:
Just wondering, does anybody asks you about the excessive locking (and
deadlocking) on foreign keys? The business about being able to drop
users and
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I figured that part of the goal of PITR was that you could recover from
just the tar backup and archived WAL files --- using the pg_xlog
contents is nice, but not something we can require.
I understood the last missing WAL log would cause missing information,
but not
oops
- FUNCTION inet_inc(int, int8) RETURNS inet
+ FUNCTION inet_inc(inet, int8) RETURNS inet
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
pgman wrote:
I figured that part of the goal of PITR was that you could recover from
just the tar backup and archived WAL files --- using the pg_xlog
contents is nice, but not something we can require.
I understood the last missing WAL log would cause missing information,
but not that it
I could still use a little clarification. It seems sort of like there is
an extra step, like:
(1) start archiving
(2) pg_start_backup()
(3) copy PGDATA directory with tar
(4) pg_stop_backup()
(5) ??
And the text you have at
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/backup-online.html
Jeff Davis wrote:
I could still use a little clarification. It seems sort of like there is
an extra step, like:
(1) start archiving
(2) pg_start_backup()
(3) copy PGDATA directory with tar
(4) pg_stop_backup()
(5) ??
And the text you have at
Hi,
My postgresql was running successfully in my Redhat LInux 9. After
1 day when i try to login to the folder /usr/local/pgsql/data to
update the ip address i am getting
as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# ls
Segmentation fault
I am unable to see the files under /usr/local/pgsql/data/,
I need to
17 matches
Mail list logo
